IMO the IPT was right on 8-ball.

Celtic

AZB's own 8-ball jihadist
Silver Member
In this one respect I think that the IPT knew that going with the popular game of the general public that is well known in both rules and difficulty was the way to go.

9-ball did not work and 10-ball is not going to work either IMO. The rotation pool games get a moderate amount of interest from the pool players and the hardcore fans such as people on this board, but Joe and Bob at the pub are alot more likely to get interested in a 8-ball match where they understand the rules and the nature of the game, and just happen to be playing it as well on a box as they pound back Bud's and eat chicken wings.

It is that familiarity that is going to compell the sponsers to support this sport, they need Joe and Bob to have an interest in the game. Celtic on the AZBilliards and 10,000 other people on AZBilliards who play competitive pool don't mean squat, we are a drop of water in a very large bucket compared to Joe and Charlie and all those other guys who do their 8-5 job and in general spend loads more cash in the bar then the true pool players. And Joe and Bob don't play 9-ball, they don't play 10-ball, and if they wanted to try it they A) would not know the rules, B) find out the game is WAY beyond their capabilites to even have fun because the average shot is hard for people with little skill, and C) they figure out fast that playing the game on a plug table means they lose out on using the whole rack of balls and they find that dumb.

I don't mind rotation pool, but I will be honest and I will be blunt. The future of this sport if people keep trying to make 9-ball or 10-ball the standard professional game is bleak. If you want to see this sport truly grow you need to get Bob and Joe interested, and if you want to get them interested you need to give them something familiar, and in pool that is far and away the game of 8-ball. The average person out there has barely heard of 9-ball and they most definately have no clue what 10-ball is.

Heck, even the grass roots of this sport is commited to 8-ball, that is the primary game in 99% of league play in the world. And it does not help whatsoever to get people interested in pool through an 8-ball league and then show some 10-ball being played by the pro's on a TV. If you could go to a sponsor and say "look we have 1.2 million people currently playing 8-ball in league systems so the interest is out there" that helps. Those league players at the lower levels have interest in 8-ball, they like the game. I have talked to enough of those lower level players that make up the huge bulk of the playerbase of pool players though and they avoid 9-ball and would not dream of playing 10-ball because it is too hard for them to play, and these people are involved in league, with the bar hacks it is even worse.

The IPT knew what they were doing, 8-ball on a 9-foot table with fairly tight pockets and slow cloth.

If this sport wants money, which it most definately needs, it is going to need to cater to the general public/consumers that the sponsors are going to want to be watching if they are even going to think about upping the cash. And if the last 2+ decades have shown us anything it is that the general public could not care less about rotation pool as a spectator sport.

This thread was brought on by the "why pool struggles" People claimed money is th reason. They are not wrong, but why does pool not attract the sponsors? It is not appealing to the general public, and why is that? The above is a critical misstep this sport took and noone seems to have the will to put it back on the right path.
 
Last edited:
I agree with some of what you say but they also must follow the womens pro circuit.The ladies seem to be doing pretty good.
The main reason pool wont ever be a super sport is because it is not T.V. friendly.Not to many people want to see someone run a rack out and then start al over again. keep the attention span of the public and maybe you can keep pool.There are also too many other sports here that compete for advertising dollars that are more T.V. friendly.JMO
 
Actually Joe and Bob would watch the match and see that the players don't put the cue ball in the "kitchen" after a scratch and find that dumb.... I mean why would you penalize a person for committing a foul by giving the other guy ball in hand that's just stupid. Then they would find that the game is a lot easier than the game they play because the players aren't diagramming their shots and calling all of their kisses, caroms, and banks.


Then again maybe the bar bangers would figure out how a real match of eight ball is played.
 
Yeah I agree with allot you have said, but the problems with televising 8-ball can be tough, longer games, ect.

Then the Kevin Trudeau thing, not even sure if all the players got paid out from the Ipt. Great concept but you need to pay your players. Allot of players counted on the Ipt to fluorish sp? and give pool a fighting chance but what happened? Players like Paul Potier, now don't even play anymore but get regular 9-5 type jobs. It's sad. And I believe worse in most parts of Canada.
 
i agree 1000000000000000000% the reason why?


People know the rules(for the most part) since its the common bar/home game. Sell what sells. More people play 8 ball than any other game, probably more than all the games added up, true they arnt "players" or hardcore pool fans like the people here on AZ, but go to time square and ask 100 people the rules of pool, the ones who know what a pool table is will tell you the 8ball rules.


since the game is established, using the slow cloth to repliclaite home play was a smart move too and made the game alot harder.


Great Idea that went down the tubes. but pool didnt kill it, the UIGEA law did, cutting off the $$$$, but thats another topic.


So to stay on topic-yeah promote the hell out of 8 ball and you'll have more people appericate it, ESPN has been showing 9 ball for years and people cant tell you the rules 5 minutes after the show is off, but they all seem to know 8 ball, or some version of it. Why try and push water up hill(marketing 10 ball) Sure 10 ball is a better game, but if pool is going to grow 10 ball aint taking pool anywhere, 3 hour races to 11 wont sell. hell i get board watching them. And I love pool.
 
I agree with some of what you say but they also must follow the womens pro circuit.The ladies seem to be doing pretty good.

Pretty good? They have not alot more money then the men on their tour. And they can thank ALOT of their success to Jeanette Lee and her alone because she marketed herself extremely well and in turn the WPBA got alot of publicity.

The main reason pool wont ever be a super sport is because it is not T.V. friendly.

I would disagree with that. I think that pool is about 1000 times more T.V friendly then darts, or bowling. Both of those sports are vastly more repetitive and boring and both have far less casual participation yet atm they are doing better then pool.

IMO this is a copout and it is false, the game has not been marketed or presented right and this has caused the sport to suffer greatly. Your reply is akin to throwing in the towl and admitting eternal despair for the sport and I am not willing to admit that in the slightest until someone truly puts out an honest attempt at marketing and presenting the sport correctly.

If TAR is able to get people paying $25 a pop to watch a money match then there must be some interest in watching pool. The general public could see that interest as well if the sport was presented to them in a way they understand.
 
Then again maybe the bar bangers would figure out how a real match of eight ball is played.

You just hit on another major benefit. It would not take them long to figure out how the game is properly played.

Ball in hand is a very small and very easy rule change to understand.

Calling only the ball and the pocket will save bars tremendously on cleaning agents they use to clean up the blood from their floor that got there after a disagreement on whether that ball kissed one ball or two on the way into the pocket.

The correct 8-ball rules would be quite easily accepted by the general public and would in fact be adopted by them.

Furthermore while playing 8-ball matches live on TV you can also advertise the league systems and help strengthen the grass roots of the sport, a type of synergy where the sport gets some sponsorship from league systems and in turn the sport as a whole gets more participation.
 
Last edited:
Forget who ran it. Forget who didn't get paid at the end, the IPT had the right idea. If it would have started with $100,000-$200,000 purses and $500 qualifiers it would have had the best chance EVER to bring pool mainstream. Of course 8-ball would be the way to go...that's a no brainer IMO. It's a shame he started too big. Johnnyt
 
Great Idea that went down the tubes. but pool didnt kill it, the UIGEA law did, cutting off the $$$$, but thats another topic.

That and the fact they lost their live television deal. If they had marketed that, advertised that live pool was going to be played for a $500,000 first place prize 2-weeks before the event, showed the players, showed some hot chicks walking the players out into a glitzy arena, showed some star the public know and can relate with going "man, I cannot wait, this is gonna be awesome", I would be very interested to see what would have come of it all.

Instead they lost their live TV deal, the event was not marketed at all except to the pool playing forums for the most part, the sponsorship fell through, and here we are.

I am not even sure what happened to the poker playing advertising. I still see tons of ads for poker sites "same guy, better watch!". They still advertise up here in Canada like crazy and there are still a boatload of players on those sites from the USA. That law did not do alot, the players still play and the ads can still flow offering a chance to play pool for fun, no money required, and then let those who check the site out do as they will...

Fatboy said:
Why try and push water up hill(marketing 10 ball) Sure 10 ball is a better game, but if pool is going to grow 10 ball aint taking pool anywhere, 3 hour races to 11 wont sell. hell i get board watching them. And I love pool.

Well said, that is the perfect summary of what rotation pool is doing to this sport.
 
Last edited:
Forget who ran it. Forget who didn't get paid at the end, the IPT had the right idea. If it would have started with $100,000-$200,000 purses and $500 qualifiers it would have had the best chance EVER to bring pool mainstream. Of course 8-ball would be the way to go...that's a no brainer IMO. It's a shame he started too big. Johnnyt

It was ran by Kevin Truedeau and I believe that Efren was the one that didn't get paid I remember in a interview that said Efren didn't get paid right away .
 
You my friend are a 100% correct.90% of the population plays 8 ball.

Nice B.S.ing with you Shane.Maybe we will see you at the P.J. vs Martin match.
I'm willing to wager if I get Dave.:wink:
 
You my friend are a 100% correct.90% of the population plays 8 ball.

Nice B.S.ing with you Shane.Maybe we will see you at the P.J. vs Martin match.
I'm willing to wager if I get Dave.:wink:

I cannot bet on it, I am racking and reffing. I will certainly be there though and if you show up I owe ya a drink :)
 
Come on guys. 8 ball on a 9 footers (especially at the pro level) is just to easy. The only way to slow it down is trick tables etc. If Bubba doesn't get it...he never will Rotation games are no more complicated then 8-ball.

Tell me that Football is easier to understand.
 
Come on guys. 8 ball on a 9 footers (especially at the pro level) is just to easy. The only way to slow it down is trick tables etc.

Given who won the IPT events it is pretty apparent the players who were the best were well displayed at the end.

I would say 4 1/4 cut diamonds with a slow cloth would pretty much be ideal. 8-ball on those conditions would not be overly easy, short stops are not going to take out top pro's often at all in that game in a race to 7, alternate break, win by 2.

There is nothing "trick" about a 4 1/4 cut pocket, that is what pro level pool should be played on.
 
Did you see the John & Oscar match last week? The table does play a part. Pro's tare up 8-ball. 4.25 works on new cloth and perfectly level and well setup tables. Your average pool hall is not setup for those kind of tolerances.


Given who won the IPT events it is pretty apparent the players who were the best were well displayed at the end.

I would say 4 1/4 cut diamonds with a slow cloth would pretty much be ideal. 8-ball on those conditions would not be overly easy, short stops are not going to take out top pro's often at all in that game in a race to 7, alternate break, win by 2.

There is nothing "trick" about a 4 1/4 cut pocket, that is what pro level pool should be played on.
 
and you throw in some slower cloth and wa-la. The tables up at magoos were IPT "qualified" and they had the ipt balls and the action was not like armith on a 860 simonis. You had to POWER stroke alot more balls, the game was easier b/c of openness, but you still got to move to get there...you gotta have a good stroke on a slow playing table to run out in 8ball. It's just as good a show of skill as 9 ball maybe even more so.
 
A bunch of choices vs 1, but you have a lot of obstacles in your way, and you have to think. 9-Ball tells you what to do, 8-Ball you have to figure it out. And in 9-Ball you can get lucky and win on the 2nd or 3rd shot if a combo lines up after the break. Or you can shit a ball in and win.

And in 8 ball, you still gotta shoot if your opponent almost runs out. Yeah, its wide open and any ball will work, but you still gotta make more than just 1 ball. But if your opponent only makes 1 ball on the break and misses, now you gotta think and shoot some more. 9-Ball just got so popular because its a good action game, its fast paced, there's more luck, and anyone can win (or at least thinks they can). Think about it, if rotation games are the way to go, then why don't we all just play rotation? Because its too damn hard. It kills all the action. The better players become much more obvious. 9-Ball helps blur the lines between the top players and mediocre players. Its part of the reason for the recent trend towards 10-Ball. The top players are tired of losing to less skilled players.

I know this debate could go on forever about which game is harder, and I know most people here will disagree with me :) - but I agree that 8-Ball is the way to go to popularize pool with the public and bring in outside support. The "shady" image is not necessarily all that hurts pool, look how big poker got. Money attracts attention, and there is no big money pool on TV. No one cares unless they know the next shot, hit, decision, or whatever is for big money.

I think TAR is on the right track, people will tune in if they know money is on the line. It's exciting. I have thought for a long time that the best way to promote pool is to promote the so-called underside. Tell the gritty stories, talk about the action, promote the money matches. Everyone, poolplayer or not, loves to watch anything when the money is on the line and the pressure is high. Part of what helped promote tournament poker is that at first glance, it looks like every pot is huge, because TV makes it look like tourney chips are real money. In the beginning of televised poker at least.

We forget, since we are all so close to this game and the lifestyle, that the average American doesn't pick up on these things as quick. I know lots of people that think the chips are real money on TV. Yes, things have changed lately because poker has been on TV several years, but when it first started getting big, people thought every pot was $500,000 - when in reality it was just tournament chips.

Money will bring attention, and TAR is proving that. And a game the public knows, like solid-and-stripes, will let them tune in and pay attention. I forget the term for it, but its a marketing term for our problem. I think its called myopic vision, or something like that. We see things differently because we are all so close to it everyday. Step back and realize that the avg Joe only, maybe, knows 8-Ball. A lot still call it solids-and-stripes. If they see that on TV, at least they can follow along. If they think the ugly guy on TV is shooting the next 3 low balls to win $500,000, they're not changing the channel.

Of course, where the money comes from i don't know :)

Wow, my post rambled a bunch, sorry about that... I'm in France and wine is cheap here :)
 
In this one respect I think that the IPT knew that going with the popular game of the general public that is well known in both rules and difficulty was the way to go.

9-ball did not work and 10-ball is not going to work either IMO. The rotation pool games get a moderate amount of interest from the pool players and the hardcore fans such as people on this board, but Joe and Bob at the pub are alot more likely to get interested in a 8-ball match where they understand the rules and the nature of the game, and just happen to be playing it as well on a box as they pound back Bud's and eat chicken wings.

It is that familiarity that is going to compell the sponsers to support this sport, they need Joe and Bob to have an interest in the game. Celtic on the AZBilliards and 10,000 other people on AZBilliards who play competitive pool don't mean squat, we are a drop of water in a very large bucket compared to Joe and Charlie and all those other guys who do their 8-5 job and in general spend loads more cash in the bar then the true pool players. And Joe and Bob don't play 9-ball, they don't play 10-ball, and if they wanted to try it they A) would not know the rules, B) find out the game is WAY beyond their capabilites to even have fun because the average shot is hard for people with little skill, and C) they figure out fast that playing the game on a plug table means they lose out on using the whole rack of balls and they find that dumb.

I don't mind rotation pool, but I will be honest and I will be blunt. The future of this sport if people keep trying to make 9-ball or 10-ball the standard professional game is bleak. If you want to see this sport truly grow you need to get Bob and Joe interested, and if you want to get them interested you need to give them something familiar, and in pool that is far and away the game of 8-ball. The average person out there has barely heard of 9-ball and they most definately have no clue what 10-ball is.

Heck, even the grass roots of this sport is commited to 8-ball, that is the primary game in 99% of league play in the world. And it does not help whatsoever to get people interested in pool through an 8-ball league and then show some 10-ball being played by the pro's on a TV. If you could go to a sponsor and say "look we have 1.2 million people currently playing 8-ball in league systems so the interest is out there" that helps. Those league players at the lower levels have interest in 8-ball, they like the game. I have talked to enough of those lower level players that make up the huge bulk of the playerbase of pool players though and they avoid 9-ball and would not dream of playing 10-ball because it is too hard for them to play, and these people are involved in league, with the bar hacks it is even worse.

The IPT knew what they were doing, 8-ball on a 9-foot table with fairly tight pockets and slow cloth.

If this sport wants money, which it most definately needs, it is going to need to cater to the general public/consumers that the sponsors are going to want to be watching if they are even going to think about upping the cash. And if the last 2+ decades have shown us anything it is that the general public could not care less about rotation pool as a spectator sport.

This thread was brought on by the "why pool struggles" People claimed money is th reason. They are not wrong, but why does pool not attract the sponsors? It is not appealing to the general public, and why is that? The above is a critical misstep this sport took and noone seems to have the will to put it back on the right path.
8-ball is just too easy for pros on a 9 foot table. It may be the most popular game for players who can't make three balls in a row, but that does not mean it is the game the pros should be playing.
 
I'm glad they showcased 8-ball. I'm pretty pissed off that they didn't use the World Standardized Rules. That just aided the confusion that already exists among recreational players as to what the rules are.

Fred
 
Back
Top