In your opinion who are the best up and coming cue makers...

I have gotten to know Dennis Searing a little bit through phone conversations, and hopefully will meet him this fall. The one thing that struck me right away was his eagerness to learn & expand his horizons. This guy reminded me of a newbie builder who is so excited that he can't sleep without dreaming of ways to make better cues. I visited Dave Barrenbrugge & noticed the same energy. The guy is a walking, talking embodiment of ideas. I talk to Barry Szamboti once & he explained to me how he doesn't care what materials cost so long as they are absolutely the best, perfect, and he's always looking for better. Coincidence? Not a chance. The guys on top are on top because that's where they want to be. They don't settle for less than their best & their best is never good enough. They don't get comfortable with their abilities & knowledge. There's no "going through the motions" for them. Every cue is training for the next cue that is going to be even better. They never cared about being at the top of their feild. They only cared about building the very best cue possible, and before they knew it they were at the top. Even at the top, they strive to climb higher & push the envelope even further. So who makes it to the top I think will be determined by their drive from within. We are all capable, but the best will be determined by desire & a little luck.

That said, I think the up-&-comer as of now who has the right ingredients is Masonh. If he keeps up his pace & continues to eagerly search for knowledge like he is now, then in a couple years he'll surpass 90% of the builders already mentioned.
 
I see that ....

trey said:
Chris has that ebony cue you like so much for sale on his site right now...

Forgot to put the web address. www.cbcues.com

Thanks for the link that is a beauty of a Cue ... I like it so much that I have Jimmy Lee making me one similar but a little different ... the forearm in mine is going to be quilted maple with ebony points and butt sleeve ... With not the same inlays and ring work but you will see a likeness of it ...
I even sent Jimmy a picture of this cue and a Scruggs and a Palmer that I was showing him things I wanted my cue to look like ...
 
My picks are:

Masonh
Jeff Olney
Eric Crisp

Might be adding to this list when I get my cues on order from Joey and Varney.
 
Pat Diveney, and I know I spelled it wrong.
headagainstwall.gif
 
ScottR said:
I whole-heartedly agree with your choices and would add Joel Hercek, Dennis Searing and James White in the 20 years category.
If we had a vote, do we put in James White before, after, or with Paul Mottey?

Fred
 
Cornerman said:
If we had a vote, do we put in James White before, after, or with Paul Mottey?

Fred
I thought about that when I made my post naming James and not Paul and it is not an easy question to me. If pushed, I would have to say "with".

Paul laid the groundwork, has done done some really innovative cues and taught Jim. Jim is taking that base and really running with it, creating breathtaking designs and execution.

I've said it before, privately to friends, and now I guess I'll go on record......"name a cue maker that can, and is willing to, build any kind of cue, in any style, to the level of execution that Jim does".

Scott <<== not intending any flame wars, or my cue maker can kick your cue makers ass posts......just one man's humble thought
 
Zinzola

I have really liked the look of Tony's cues. I have not had an opportunity to see one in person, but everything he has posted has had a clean traditional look.

Mark
 
Cornerman said:
If we had a vote, do we put in James White before, after, or with Paul Mottey?

Fred


After, of course, Fred. What kind of question is that? Paul goes in with Richard Black, Joss West, Gina, etc.... James is the next generation.
MULLY
sorry, heavily biased towards Paul Mottey
 
mullyman said:
After, of course, Fred. What kind of question is that? Paul goes in with Richard Black, Joss West, Gina, etc.... James is the next generation.
MULLY
sorry, heavily biased towards Paul Mottey
And, my post above was not meant as a negative toward Mr. Mottey. At all.
 
Steve Klapp is doing a bang-up job & Chuck Starkey makes a fine cue.
 
mullyman said:
After, of course, Fred. What kind of question is that? Paul goes in with Richard Black, Joss West, Gina, etc.... James is the next generation.
MULLY
sorry, heavily biased towards Paul Mottey
It was a question to make sure people didn't get mixed signals from your post as well as Scott's. Paul is a future Hall of Famer. I wanted to make sure it was explicitly said.

Fred <~~~ doesn't get a vote
 
Cornerman said:
It was a question to make sure people didn't get mixed signals from your post as well as Scott's. Paul is a future Hall of Famer. I wanted to make sure it was explicitly said.

Fred <~~~ doesn't get a vote
You are right. Paul Mottey gets my (virtual)vote for getting in within 10 years.

Scott
 
poolhustler said:
Lots of great cuemakers have been listed.

How about the following??

Ariel Carmeli ??

Mike Montavlo

Tim Padgett.....he is working again!!

Russ......


My vote is for Ariel Carmeli as well! Great looking cues and even better playability! His cues keep getting better and better.... and the best part is that I don't think he's reached his full potential yet.


Donald
 
Re: Darrin Hill

Cornerman said:
I think he's still got a ways to go.

Fred

Why not Darrin Hill? Since he's relatively close to me, I've probably seen more of his work than any other custom cue maker. I'm new to custom cues, so I don't know much, but his work is what got me interested. I don't much care for the hit of his cues, but that's a personal preference. But I have always thought that the construction of his cues, the woods he chooses, his rings and designs were really good. So when you say he has a ways to go, could you elaborate on that please? I'm interested in knowing the specific details that lead you to your opinion. In other words, I'm looking to learn about this stuff.

Thanks
Don
 
In no particular order Eric Crisp, Jeff Olney, Mason H.
Why IMO these guys take each & ever cue they build to new levels
with the best woods, joint collars, etc,etc. They do not rush cues through
the building process. IMO thats why these guys have a waiting list.
Its not the QUANITY $$$$ they build its the QUALITY cues they build.
 
Shevek said:
Why not Darrin Hill? Since he's relatively close to me, I've probably seen more of his work than any other custom cue maker. I'm new to custom cues, so I don't know much, but his work is what got me interested. I don't much care for the hit of his cues, but that's a personal preference. But I have always thought that the construction of his cues, the woods he chooses, his rings and designs were really good. So when you say he has a ways to go, could you elaborate on that please? I'm interested in knowing the specific details that lead you to your opinion. In other words, I'm looking to learn about this stuff.

Thanks
Don

Darrin Hill is a good cuemaker. He's an up and coming cuemaker. And he's got a ton of passion. He's got an obvious following in the Chicago area. But, he's got a ways to go, just like many other up and coming cuemakers. Many up and coming cuemakers I personally put well ahead of Darrin. That's shouldn't come as an insult or as a surprise to anyone. Let's not make it one.

I don't want this to turn into an anti-anyone. My post was specifically responding to words that suggested that Darrin is the best at this and the best at that. I'm sure you've seen plenty of his work. If you have an opportunity to see plenty of others (up and comers), then you'd agree with me. He's got a ways to go if someone wants to proclaim his as the best at this and the best at that.

There are entirely too many good cuemakers to make such a bold statement. Not when the comparisons between so many good up and coming cuemakers makes such statement ridiculous at best.

Fred
 
Last edited:
Back
Top