Inside Pool Magzine is really cool!
Back around February I received my issue of Inside Pool Magazine.
Back around February I received my issue of Inside Pool Magazine.
Last edited:
Back around February I received my issue of Inside Pool Magazine and before I had a chance to read it my little girl's new puppy urinated on it. I figured no big deal.......I will call Inside Pool Magazine and surely they would send a valued customer/subscriber such as myself another copy of that issue. However, when I called they insisted I pay for the shipping of the magazine. I did not like this solution (I wanted another issue mailed to me at no charge).
I informed them that if they didn't send me another copy at no charge then when my subscription ran out I would NOT RENEW but would rather switch to another pool magazine. They said they didn't care:frown: Today I received a call from the same person seeking my renewal. When I told/reminded her what happened back in February she still basically said she didn't care. So I most likely will be subscribing to Billiards Digest. This seems to be a bad business decision on Inside Pool's part. It does not make sense for them to give up the $$$$ from my subscription (potentially many more YEARS of my subscription) for a $2 shipping charge. I should have mentioned this to JR Calvert at Valley Forge this year. I can't imagine he would have been happy about this. I actually used to play on the same APA team with JR back in the late 80's/early 90's! But I also thought maybe he would fire the girl for being, how shall I put it, not too smart. The whole situation just makes me sad and actually blows my mind.
Poolpro,Well, $2 is $2! I completely understand your point, but you are just as guilty as making a big deal out of $2 as they are.
You got what you paid for, and through no fault of theirs damaged your property ( or allowed it to be damaged). Why should they give you something for free? You expect them to give you the very thing that they SELL as their means of revenue. Why do you feel you are entitled to this? Actually they DID offer you a free copy, they just did not feel that they should also have to pay additional $$ to give you something for free.
I can't think of many things or situations where I can purchase something and go back to where I purchased it and say " well, the thing I just bought was ruined, so I am here to pick up my free replacement". Then look all put out when I do not get it and threaten to take my business elswhere.
I would love to see you sell a cue to someone who readily admits they broke the cue in half before they got to shoot with it and DEMANDS a free replacement. You then generously offer them a free replacement cue if they will cover shipping. How would you feel if this buyer then says " I do not feel I should be responsible for shipping. I will just take my business elsewhere!" I think you would be glad to let them go annoy another seller.
Look, I get it. It is only $2. But I love the mentality that something is only x but that the same amount is just as important to the person saying it is sooo insignificant! It is like when someone borrows money from you, promises to pay it back in a wekk, then when 3 weeks go by and you have the nerve to ask for it back they look shocked that you would even bring it up!! " It is ONLY $50!" They sure did not feel that way when they asked to borrow it!
Yes it would have been GREAT customer service to send you a free copy AND cover shipping! Instead you only got GOOD customer service with an offer of a free replacement minus shipping. Sure looks like you got real screwed on that one!
I would not be suprised if they sent you out a copy with free shipping, but I do not feel you are justified to feel entitled to it and demand it and make a big stink because you did not get something for nothing.
just a reality check.
Jw
I agree... and when they offered to replace the soiled issue at no cost to you more than the $2 it takes to ship it to you, you had the gall to bust their chops... unbelieveable.They sent you the copy. The copy arrived to you in good condition. IMO they don't owe you anything. Johnnyt
Well, $2 is $2! I completely understand your point, but you are just as guilty as making a big deal out of $2 as they are.
You got what you paid for, and through no fault of theirs damaged your property ( or allowed it to be damaged). Why should they give you something for free? You expect them to give you the very thing that they SELL as their means of revenue. Why do you feel you are entitled to this? Actually they DID offer you a free copy, they just did not feel that they should also have to pay additional $$ to give you something for free.
I can't think of many things or situations where I can purchase something and go back to where I purchased it and say " well, the thing I just bought was ruined, so I am here to pick up my free replacement". Then look all put out when I do not get it and threaten to take my business elswhere.
I would love to see you sell a cue to someone who readily admits they broke the cue in half before they got to shoot with it and DEMANDS a free replacement. You then generously offer them a free replacement cue if they will cover shipping. How would you feel if this buyer then says " I do not feel I should be responsible for shipping. I will just take my business elsewhere!" I think you would be glad to let them go annoy another seller.
Look, I get it. It is only $2. But I love the mentality that something is only x but that the same amount is just as important to the person saying it is sooo insignificant! It is like when someone borrows money from you, promises to pay it back in a wekk, then when 3 weeks go by and you have the nerve to ask for it back they look shocked that you would even bring it up!! " It is ONLY $50!" They sure did not feel that way when they asked to borrow it!
Yes it would have been GREAT customer service to send you a free copy AND cover shipping! Instead you only got GOOD customer service with an offer of a free replacement minus shipping. Sure looks like you got real screwed on that one!
I would not be suprised if they sent you out a copy with free shipping, but I do not feel you are justified to feel entitled to it and demand it and make a big stink because you did not get something for nothing.
just a reality check.
Jw
Poolpro,
I understand where you are coming from. But understand I could have fibbed a little to them and said my issue was damaged when I got it....but I told them the truth and in a way it was a little test to see how much they value me as a customer/subscriber. There is more than one magazine vying for my subscription dollars. It is not that I feel "entitled" to receive another copy at no charge.....it is more that I feel they are not valuing my patronage enough. And that is cool......I will read a different magazine. You will never be able to convince me that it was a "smart" business decision on their part. It was one issue and a one-time thing. Inside Pool Magazine's representative's attitude was not a good attitude. I still believe you should bend over backwards to "satisfy the customer". And simply sending out one extra issue at no charge, in my mind, does not even come close to qualifying as "bending over backwards". As I said this situation makes me sad not mad. The company/supplier must do more and be held more accountable, in my eyes, than the patron/subscriber. Hell no I shouldn't have let the dog pee on my magazine. But a good company would not care, a good customer representative would look at the entire picture and fix the problem to the customer's satisfaction, the company needs to simply DO MORE. Entitled? Heck no! Expecting resolution to my satisfaction? Sorry but YES!
Poolpro,
I understand where you are coming from. But understand I could have fibbed a little to them and said my issue was damaged when I got it....but I told them the truth and in a way it was a little test to see how much they value me as a customer/subscriber. There is more than one magazine vying for my subscription dollars. It is not that I feel "entitled" to receive another copy at no charge.....it is more that I feel they are not valuing my patronage enough. And that is cool......I will read a different magazine. You will never be able to convince me that it was a "smart" business decision on their part. It was one issue and a one-time thing. Inside Pool Magazine's representative's attitude was not a good attitude. I still believe you should bend over backwards to "satisfy the customer". And simply sending out one extra issue at no charge, in my mind, does not even come close to qualifying as "bending over backwards". As I said this situation makes me sad not mad. The company/supplier must do more and be held more accountable, in my eyes, than the patron/subscriber. Hell no I shouldn't have let the dog pee on my magazine. But a good company would not care, a good customer representative would look at the entire picture and fix the problem to the customer's satisfaction, the company needs to simply DO MORE. Entitled? Heck no! Expecting resolution to my satisfaction? Sorry but YES!
Back around February I received my issue of Inside Pool Magazine and before I had a chance to read it my little girl's new puppy urinated on it. I figured no big deal.......I will call Inside Pool Magazine and surely they would send a valued customer/subscriber such as myself another copy of that issue. However, when I called they insisted I pay for the shipping of the magazine. I did not like this solution (I wanted another issue mailed to me at no charge).
I informed them that if they didn't send me another copy at no charge then when my subscription ran out I would NOT RENEW but would rather switch to another pool magazine. They said they didn't care:frown: Today I received a call from the same person seeking my renewal. When I told/reminded her what happened back in February she still basically said she didn't care. So I most likely will be subscribing to Billiards Digest. This seems to be a bad business decision on Inside Pool's part. It does not make sense for them to give up the $$$$ from my subscription (potentially many more YEARS of my subscription) for a $2 shipping charge. I should have mentioned this to JR Calvert at Valley Forge this year. I can't imagine he would have been happy about this. I actually used to play on the same APA team with JR back in the late 80's/early 90's! But I also thought maybe he would fire the girl for being, how shall I put it, not too smart. The whole situation just makes me sad and actually blows my mind.