IPT - Results and Queries here!

I'm very impressed with my fellow countryman Ivica Putnik. 5 break and runs against Hann. Wow. If he didn't dog that 8ball for the win agains Alcano, he would be one of the few with a perfect record. Watch out for him!
 
mechanic/player said:
Thanks for the updates Colin, how's Grady doing?
Grady did have much roll well for him today and unfortunately we didn't get to see him in his best form. Hope to see that turn around for him in the next event.

Colin
 
Questions ...

Do players get a chance to warm up any on the table they are to play on?
Are they flipping or lagging for the break?

I would think that many players early in the morning might be down to warm up and to practice to get 2 good breaks going. I think the B&R would probably be quite a bit higher if they could side break.

It is winner breaks, right?
 
onepocketchump said:
Regarding the break cues. From what I understand the part of the cue that hits the cueball must be made of leather, not partially leather. I altered the Fury Jump/Break cue so that it has a 100% leather tip on it and gave one each to Kelly Fisher, Austin Murphy, and Ronnie O'Sullivan (his will be there in the morning). These three shafts conform 100% to the rule as it is understood.

2.0 Cue Stick Specifications
All cue sticks must meet the following specifications:
a. No shorter than 53" and no longer than 63"
b. No lighter than 15 ounces and no heavier than 25 ounces.
c. Balance point at least 33" from the tip of the cue.
d. Leather cue tip.
Referees or IPT officials may inspect any cue at any time. If a cue that does not meet specifications is found being used by a player it will result in an immediate loss of a game or more depending on the magnitude of the offense.


I don't see anything that leaves it open to interpretation that a partially leather tip qualifies. Plus, if Earl really did start using a phenolic tip then he is a huge hypocrite. Maybe they should have a weigh-in like in horse racing to make everyone submit their stuff for inspection. Personally I thin kthat everyone should be allowed to use whatever they want as long as they are not harming the equipment or distracting the other players. I mean really, who is going to be checking balance points or weights? I bet there is not a single scale at the tournament EXCEPT for Joe Blackburn's.

John


Hello,
Well apparently one of the Cuetec fans on the Pro9 forums tells me thatthe cue could have been a Cuetec Vortex break shaft as it has a black ferrule and tip and is easy to confuse with leather. Still not 100% sure either way but apologies to Earl if I was wrong.
As for those IPT regulations, well, I think that all equipment should be checked backstage before the players are let into the arena. Gets rid of all the confusion and gossip doesn't it!

Thanks,
Chris (Chrstc).
 
Snapshot9 said:
Do players get a chance to warm up any on the table they are to play on?
Are they flipping or lagging for the break?

I would think that many players early in the morning might be down to warm up and to practice to get 2 good breaks going. I think the B&R would probably be quite a bit higher if they could side break.

It is winner breaks, right?
The players usually get to have a hit on the table before the matches. Sometimes if a previous game runs long there is no time for this, but usually the table is available for 30 minutes or so for practice if a player wants to get on the table. But after the first round, most are happy to take most of the time between matches to rest.

Players lag for the first break.

Some practice their breaking...I saw Hohmann doing this today. No one seems to have any ideas about breaking that's advantageous except for just smashing it right in the center.

Colin
 
Grady controversey?

Colin Colenso said:
Grady did have much roll well for him today and unfortunately we didn't get to see him in his best form. Hope to see that turn around for him in the next event.

Colin

I read that Grady had a dispute with the Ref during one of his sets and was penalized, any idea what happened?
 
Colin Colenso said:
btw: Our own Linda 'Rackemsucker' Carter, who showed promise all day, came up with some great pool in her last match against qualifier David Broxson by taking him to the double-hill after trailing 7-3? (or something like that). She made a few very impressive outs and gained the enthusiastic following of a small crowd of onlookers and supporters.

She would have taken that match except for a slight loss of concentration on a ball that would have left her with a relatively easy out chance.

The Queen certainly does have a good game in her and I'm glad to say we got to see some of it today.

Colin

Thanks Colin. I pooched the out to win and that was disappointing, but I did get a nice compliment from John Schmidt who told me my 2 ball shot was amazing to get shape on the 8. That I looked it over and thought the shot out and pointed at it showed it wasn't a fluke. That was high praise from a guy that cut a ball on the rail at about 95 degrees :eek: at 1000 miles an hour on both me and someone else was telling him he did that on him as well.
 
Burning question ....

When will the player's have a chance to eat lunch and dinner today with them playing 5 matches in a row?
 
Bill O said:
I read that Grady had a dispute with the Ref during one of his sets and was penalized, any idea what happened?
Sorry, I dunno about that. I'll ask Grady when I see him.

btw: Players who have quick games will have plenty of time to eat, but a slow player with a few tight matches could starve to death out there today:eek: ....:D

Colin
 
Thanks for all the updates Colin, wished I was there:( Keep an eye on Edwin Montal for me, he is a strong player that could surprise some people.
 
Colin, if you get a chance, I'd like to know a few more general things about the event:

1)Who's looking hungriest and most in form from what you've seen so far?
2)Who are the unknowns who could surprise the heck out of people and go into the latter stages, you think?
3)The pics on the IPT site appear to show a much more low-key playing environment than Orlando's glamour. How well is the tournament being run?

Thanks a bunch!:)
 
interesting wager?

predator said:
I'm very impressed with my fellow countryman Ivica Putnik. 5 break and runs against Hann. Wow. If he didn't dog that 8ball for the win agains Alcano, he would be one of the few with a perfect record. Watch out for him!

Anybody got a list of undefeated players? Any bold predictions on last man down? What's the over and under for the end of today.
 
rackem said:
Anybody got a list of undefeated players? Any bold predictions on last man down? What's the over and under for the end of today.

I pick Bustamante to win it all. With his break and the roll he's on so far in the tournament, it's going to be very difficult for even Efren to top him now.

Of course I guess it's not all that bold to pick the guy with a 6-0 record and over 80% winning percentage so far to win it. Oh well, I'm going out on a limb :rolleyes:

-Andrew
 
I looked at group 13 and saw where Lori John had a lower win percentage than another player she was tied with, but she advanced, and he was eliminated. Why did this happen? My understanding was that ties would first go to the win percentage and then to the number of break and runs / 8 ball on the breaks. Anyone??
 
Krypto said:
I looked at group 13 and saw where Lori John had a lower win percentage than another player she was tied with, but she advanced, and he was eliminated. Why did this happen? My understanding was that ties would first go to the win percentage and then to the number of break and runs / 8 ball on the breaks. Anyone??

Her winning percentage has gone down since the second round has started and it pulls their percentage from the running total. After the first round she was ahead in winning percentage of at least one of the people she was tied with.
 
lewdo26 said:
Colin, if you get a chance, I'd like to know a few more general things about the event:

1)Who's looking hungriest and most in form from what you've seen so far?
2)Who are the unknowns who could surprise the heck out of people and go into the latter stages, you think?
3)The pics on the IPT site appear to show a much more low-key playing environment than Orlando's glamour. How well is the tournament being run?

Thanks a bunch!:)

Hi Lewdo,
1. Everyone looks pretty hungry...I couldn't guess based on that alone. Maybe Ortmann looks hungriest, but he always has that look:cool:

2. Surprises in my books would be Appleton, Boyes and Hann in my book. Hann just handed Marlon his first loss...about 8-3 I think. He's getting that cocky swagger and smirkish grin happening so he'll be dangerous.

3. The room is spectacular, though seating is not idea. This is partly because they will be re-arranging the room tomorrow for the field of 60.

To Sniper,
I'll have a look for Montal in round 4 and see how he's playing.

Colin
 
JAM said:
Hi Lewdo,
1. Everyone looks pretty hungry...I couldn't guess based on that alone. Maybe Ortmann looks hungriest, but he always has that look:cool:

2. Surprises in my books would be Appleton, Boyes and Hann in my book. Hann just handed Marlon his first loss...about 8-3 I think. He's getting that cocky swagger and smirkish grin happening so he'll be dangerous.

3. The room is spectacular, though seating is not idea. This is partly because they will be re-arranging the room tomorrow for the field of 60.

To Sniper,
I'll have a look for Montal in round 4 and see how he's playing.

Colin


Colin and JAM?!!! :D :eek:

PS
Suprises, in my tips! ;)
 
She beat Ernesto Dominguez head to head. That's my guess why she advanced.

Krypto said:
I looked at group 13 and saw where Lori John had a lower win percentage than another player she was tied with, but she advanced, and he was eliminated. Why did this happen? My understanding was that ties would first go to the win percentage and then to the number of break and runs / 8 ball on the breaks. Anyone??
 
Back
Top