just saw the thread about centenial balls are $400
aramith pro is in the $260 RANGE
most played on table in tournaments is diamond not Brunswick (imho)
is brunswick a second class citizen now for sure??
Only to an overzealous Diamond table owner... retailer... or employee of Diamond perhaps. I can't attest to the latest production of Brunswick within the last year or so... but I know that I'll put my GC-IV up against any Diamond out there in how well tuned it plays... and so will anyone who has ever shot on my table.
I'm not going to bash Cyclop balls (mainly because I've never shot with a set). I do read complaints all of the time about them but I have 2 sets of Centennials (standard and TV Tour) and 1 set of Aramith Super Pros and they all roll quite true and rack tight... so I have no reason to spend money on a set of Cyclops.
As for my table... I like the classic look of the GC table and the contoured rails as opposed to the boxy (butcher's block) look of the Diamond... but that's just my personal taste. I wouldn't mind having an older Centennial table (strictly because I love the "ultimate" classic look), but I assure you that a Centennial as well as any Diamond table out there won't play any better than my GC-IV.
As for the OP's quote "most played on table in tournaments is diamond not Brunswick (imho)"... not from what I see televised in the men's "pro" tournaments. It seems like most "pro" tournaments that I've watched over the past year or two have been played on 10' Brunswick tables... and they are running racks like crazy. But I have to admit that I'm spending far more time shooting than watching these days.
I think that it's all about how you set your table up (if it's a quality table) and not if it's a Diamond or a Brunswick.
