Patrick Johnson said:LOL. Hal, you've finally honed your posts to their essence.
pj
chgo
That's the Houlian Fractional Sentence System.:grin:
Colin
Patrick Johnson said:LOL. Hal, you've finally honed your posts to their essence.
pj
chgo
That's because if you miss you want the ball to stay in front of the pocket. Most good bankers play with a good firm stroke.Cannonball55 said:I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet : You tend to see more of a controled, slower speed, trickling paced banking stroke in 1Pocket
You have several 1pocket masters of the trickle bank, Cliff is the best at this IMO .
About 25+ years ago Gary and I were often playing in a local 9-ball tournament. Before the tournament, players would be warming up and a few times Gary and I were warming up together. Since he was such a strong player, if we just played some 9-ball games I wouldn't get many shots. So the way we played 9-ball was that he had to bank every ball!!! Now here's the strong part, as I recall, Gary would usually win at least half of those games!mullyman said:I started playing pool in the room where Gary Spaeth played. Not too many people that wouldn't rank him up with the best bankers that have ever lived. He used to fire them in too unless the position called for some kind of finesse. Either way he was dead on. I used to watch him play banks on the snooker table they had there. Just incredible to watch someone of his calibre at banking do something like that.
He told me one time that he hits them really firm so they don't roll off.
When I first started going there I heard stories about him being a World Champion bank player. After a few weeks when I finally got to meet him I was a bit disappointed when he came in because I was expecting someone like Mike Sigel in the fancy clothes etc... Gary was a regular Joe like the rest of us and he always looked sleepy. hehe!! I got a little cocky and walked over to where he was playing and said "They told me you're a really good banker, show me something." He proceeded to pull a ball out of the corner pocket, drop it on the table, put his cue behind his back and banked it cross corner the length of the table. He didn't set the balls up either, he just dropped them down and did it.........twice. I never got cocky with him again after that.
I've seen him break and run out a rack of 9-ball banking everything in numerical order. It was just insane watching him play banks or one pocket.
MULLY
I mostly play one-pocket, so even when I play bank, I tend to hit many banks, especially the ones into a corner pocket, pretty softly. Just can't get away from that pocket speed.Cannonball55 said:I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet : You tend to see more of a controled, slower speed, trickling paced banking stroke in 1Pocket
You have several 1pocket masters of the trickle bank, Cliff is the best at this IMO .
Colin Colenso said:I suspect the main reason for hard banking is because there is less variation in the bounce angle from table to table.
yes pocket speed is very important in one pocket. cliff rarely misses one and rarely shoots one if it's not free. the good bankers i've been around hit most banks firm and try to stiff them, they say it makes the pockets bigger if your coming at the pocket with a more direct angle .Cannonball55 said:I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet : You tend to see more of a controled, slower speed, trickling paced banking stroke in 1Pocket
You have several 1pocket masters of the trickle bank, Cliff is the best at this IMO .
Back banks are better with a slow to soft medium stroke than being firmer because english will make the shot short if shot with a firmer stroke.
cliff rarely misses one and rarely shoots one if it's not free.
i'm talking about when he's gambling. he's usually letting someone go to 4 or 5 or 6 balls. he's passed up all easy short rail banks playing me if they were not free. it's amazing really he would probably make 3 or 4 more balls if he made the bank but instead he deals with the one in my pocket.Patrick Johnson said:I usually hear commentators scratching their heads about Cliff's tendency to take too many risks. It's why I like to watch him play.
pj
chgo
Patrick Johnson said:I don't think of it as "better" - just different. Back banks can be hit consistently with more speed if you adjust your aim accordingly. And, by the way, the same things apply to "forward" banks (where the OB picks up some running sidespin rather than holdup sidespin), so it isn't just a back bank problem, it's a cut shot problem.
The really tricky part is that the amount of transferred spin on the OB (from cutting the shot) doesn't change evenly - it goes up as the cut angle increases to a half ball hit and then back down as the angle increases more than that (and, just to make things interesting, the amount of throw changes the same way).
Transferred spin also changes with the amount of vertical spin (follow/draw/stun) and with shot speed, and none of these things changes evenly, so the combined effect of all of them is a real challenge to judge. Again, that's why bankers try to minimize these variables (usually by banking hard).
pj
chgo
freddy the beard said:Patrick, please stop posting. You are giving away secrets contained in my bank pool books for free. You are much too correct. Hopefully your comments will be overlooked. I might have to send a hit-man from my mobbed-up Chicago Bridgeport neighborhood to take you out.
the Beard
freddy the beard said:Patrick, please stop posting. You are giving away secrets contained in my bank pool books for free. You are much too correct. Hopefully your comments will be overlooked. I might have to send a hit-man from my mobbed-up Chicago Bridgeport neighborhood to take you out.
the Beard
If people want more info, the illustrations in my September '06 article show these effects. Also, my March '07 article illustrates and explains why throw and spin transfer go hand in hand.Patrick Johnson said:The really tricky part is that the amount of transferred spin on the OB (from cutting the shot) doesn't change evenly - it goes up as the cut angle increases to a half ball hit and then back down as the angle increases more than that (and, just to make things interesting, the amount of throw changes the same way).
If people wan more info, this is illustrated and explained in my October '06 article.Patrick Johnson said:Transferred spin also changes with the amount of vertical spin (follow/draw/stun) and with shot speed, and none of these things changes evenly, so the combined effect of all of them is a real challenge to judge. Again, that's why bankers try to minimize these variables (usually by banking hard).
BillPorter said:About 25+ years ago Gary and I were often playing in a local 9-ball tournament. Before the tournament, players would be warming up and a few times Gary and I were warming up together. Since he was such a strong player, if we just played some 9-ball games I wouldn't get many shots. So the way we played 9-ball was that he had to bank every ball!!! Now here's the strong part, as I recall, Gary would usually win at least half of those games!