Which test shot is that? The thread is long and my eyes are weak.Did you try the test shot?..
Which test shot is that? The thread is long and my eyes are weak.Did you try the test shot?..
Which test shot is that? The thread is long and my eyes are weak.
It’s in the original post
And the second post points to the example that I have used for many years to demonstrate throw. I find it very remarkable that you did not bother to try that test as written. In addition, there is now at least one video on-line that demonstrates the shot.It’s in the original post
Here's a demonstration of this and related effects:Not only is it possible to stop the cue ball dead and make the object ball go to the left of their line with right side spin. it is possible to make the object ball go to the left and the cue ball also go to the left with right side spin and the correct fullness of hit.
Yes, static friction (frozen balls) is stronger than kinetic friction (moving balls), so frozen balls throw more, but that doesn't mean moving balls don't throw - the difference is only fractional. It may also be that the force of the collision adds enough friction to make up the difference (I'm not sure about this).
As far as being fractional, specify your fraction. Not to be argumentative but if anyone here wants to have a solid foundation in this area of physics then we can look up a graph of static vs kinetic friction. The difference is striking. So I almost never come to an absolute stop in vehicles...it is like a game to try to avoid the final static brake grab...which is not possible.
pj
chgo
I completely disagree... you can absolutely throw the object ball...basic physics...
If there is anybody out there who still believes throw is not possible, lots of proof can be found here with countless demonstrations:
If you just want to watch one video, I recommend this one: