Except that there isn't, and for the reasons I already pointed out, it would achieve nothing.
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
Except that there isn't, and for the reasons I already pointed out, it would achieve nothing.
oh ok
Sounds like yer privy to their hidden tape debacle - that they wont show, they probly have shown u cause u can't make a ball in the ocean standing on a beach with sand between yer toes. they probly figured u don't know what to look for. Wish yer good luck on some one else hidden tape guru of epic mediocrity. I make my own and would not want any accolades from special group cowards -such as u sir or misses or who ever u claim to be ha ha what a joke u r. Come to Missouri - i show u how to hide the tape. Plus I am fairly certain that they are asking people to sign some agreement before viewing the theatrical production. See ya in duh phony noose papers shishobi
Sounds like yer privy to their hidden tape debacle - that they wont show, they probly have shown u cause u can't make a ball in the ocean standing on a beach with sand between yer toes. they probly figured u don't know what to look for. Wish yer good luck on some one else hidden tape guru of epic mediocrity. I make my own and would not want any accolades from special group cowards -such as u sir or misses or who ever u claim to be ha ha what a joke u r. Come to Missouri - i show u how to hide the tape. Plus I am fairly certain that they are asking people to sign some agreement before viewing the theatrical production. See ya in duh phony noose papers shishobi
Last edited:
Last edited:
unconnection is a good thing here
the 'unconnected people' have spoken - they are simply asking for definitive proof that the tape is legit and not some weird secret - does that bother u?
the 'unconnected people' have spoken - they are simply asking for definitive proof that the tape is legit and not some weird secret - does that bother u?
It's not more effort. You put it on Vimeo, like Accu-stats and Dr. Dave's videos, and that's the end of your effort except for advertising, if any. Vimeo sends you your money and takes care of all the admin. Vimeo has been suggested to John.
Why release copies all over the world and make 100k or so?
Simple answer is his ego to show up to the secret viewings of an edited video and get attention from nut huggers is more important than a lot of cash in his wallet.
Have you been in the military bro
I was in a small fire fight with marines for twenty minutes once before anyone found out we were shooting at ourselves lol. Admittedly though I know nothing of the navy or their intel people. I’d imagine there’s plenty of ways around the rules for people who know computers. Doing all that magic stuff.
He’s got so many people blocked for disagreeing with him that he is weeks behind on the latest info.
Have you been in the military bro
Admittedly though I know nothing of the navy or their intel people. I’d imagine there’s plenty of ways around the rules for people who know computers. Doing all that magic stuff.
He’s got so many people blocked for disagreeing with him that he is weeks behind on the latest info.
I never served and kind of regret it...but at 20, I was a very different person. I don't think enlisting then would have been a good choice.
I find it possibly impossible that Danny has friends, to begin with, but that as an aside, I really don't think one who has access to that kind of hardware is going to compromise his career- and possibly risk jail time for misappropriation of governmental property- for a pool video.
626 might be big news around here, but it doesn't extend real far.
Yeah I was mostly messing around, the military was a surprising experience for me though lol. Maybe we can convince Julian assange to take a look around the internet for this video and any evidence of tampering therein. It’s got to be hiding somewhere and he knows some people I’m pretty sure.
Lots of us recognize that beautiful table and the heartbreaking miss that is about to happen.
Sense
This is accurate, I could break bread with you - no worries that would be all. Your posts make sense and obviously non biased honest opinion. Thanks for posting - your a positive influence to this forum ShootingArts.
This is accurate, I could break bread with you - no worries that would be all. Your posts make sense and obviously non biased honest opinion. Thanks for posting - your a positive influence to this forum ShootingArts.
He wrote that he is "No fan of john's," that is the definition of a biased opinion.
ok
He accepted the claim when it first happened like many others = non biased, but after almost a year of an un confirmed video he (like me smells an expired fake news Rodent) hiding behind some hidden tape. either u believe the claim or u do not - I do not - and that is my prerogative - so please stop nit picking me. Congrats u know how to type on a computer and USE social media.
He accepted the claim when it first happened like many others = non biased, but after almost a year of an un confirmed video he (like me smells an expired fake news Rodent) hiding behind some hidden tape. either u believe the claim or u do not - I do not - and that is my prerogative - so please stop nit picking me. Congrats u know how to type on a computer and USE social media.
Hmmm
If I said I was a fan of john's, would you consider that an unbiased opinion?
Hu
He wrote that he is "No fan of john's," that is the definition of a biased opinion.
If I said I was a fan of john's, would you consider that an unbiased opinion?
Hu
Not particularly. But an argument that boils down to "I don't like John and after a short interlude now believe the 626 will go down in history as a myth" isn't either. You have the right to that opinion but Harriman's description of it as "unbiased" is wrong.
not really
Not really. I don't care about john one way or another enough to affect any decision, even the tiniest. The courts accept that as an unbiased juror. I'd say that definition of unbiased is fine for Danny to use too.
Hu
Not really. I don't care about john one way or another enough to affect any decision, even the tiniest. The courts accept that as an unbiased juror. I'd say that definition of unbiased is fine for Danny to use too.
Hu
C'mon now...you think that a potential juror who says he's 'no fan' of the defendant is gonna be selected for that jury?!
The lady who was the jury foreperson in the Roger Stone trial had made tons of social media posts stating she hated Trump and stuff about Stone being guilty before she ever became a juror.
He is asking for a retrial now.
- Status