Agreed.U r wrong - there is no reason.
Agreed.U r wrong - there is no reason.
Like Rebco is a recognized brandWhat a joke.
Your 'stock' GC 3 happens to be the easiest 9 foot table on the TDF chart.....hmm....random luck I suppose........................ you, the man paying to break the record, just happened to have the easiest 'stock' table ever produced laying around.... and then you go off and mock John's contrived conditions.
Get real.
What a joke.
But there's no evidence it was the same conditions. No evidence it wasn't either. As people have pointed out, we don't really know the table setup, and if it was changed as time went on. There are some images of a pocket, but no way to know what table that's from.I don’t think Shane Van Boening, Ruslan Chinahov, or Earl Strickland would say it was an easy table;
and since they played on it BEFORE Jayson Shaw set his record on it, they would know best.
I go back and forth on this issue. Record breaking disputes are as old as history. They wanted to put an asterisk in the record books next to Maris' 61 home run record because he had more games in which to achieve the record than Ruth had. But now, the game and the stadiums are COMPLETELY different. Is anyone going out there to measure the outfields where Judge is playing?But there's no evidence it was the same conditions. No evidence it wasn't either. As people have pointed out, we don't really know the table setup, and if it was changed as time went on. There are some images of a pocket, but no way to know what table that's from.
All we know is that:
- there were some remarkably sloppy shots made.
- Jayson said it was an easy table.
- after Jayson's 714, the table was dismantled.
The Legends group could have resolved these questions at the very beginning of each player's sessions, but seemed to argue that it was nobody's business but theirs.
"Shane will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Ruslan will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Earl will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Jayson will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
Yup, exactly!I go back and forth on this issue. Record breaking disputes are as old as history. They wanted to put an asterisk in the record books next to Maris' 61 home run record because he had more games in which to achieve the record than Ruth had. But now, the game and the stadiums are COMPLETELY different. Is anyone going out there to measure the outfields where Judge is playing?
This is what happens when you put too much value on a record. It's a measure of achievement particular to the era in which it was accomplished and trying to apply it over a 100 year period is silly.
Set up a regulation pool table and have at it. For a record, have someone certify that the table is legit.
But there's no evidence it was the same conditions. No evidence it wasn't either. As people have pointed out, we don't really know the table setup, and if it was changed as time went on. There are some images of a pocket, but no way to know what table that's from.
All we know is that:
- there were some remarkably sloppy shots made.
- Jayson said it was an easy table.
- after Jayson's 714, the table was dismantled.
The Legends group could have resolved these questions at the very beginning of each player's sessions, but seemed to argue that it was nobody's business but theirs.
"Shane will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Ruslan will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Earl will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Jayson will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
Nobody messed with the table.But there's no evidence it was the same conditions. No evidence it wasn't either. As people have pointed out, we don't really know the table setup, and if it was changed as time went on.
If you don’t know Deon Chapman or Bobby Chamberlain, you have no room to disparage the pictures that they took, from the location with their own phones!There are some images of a pocket, but no way to know what table that's from.
All we know is: we can’t compare John Schmidt’s run to Jayson SHAW’S run.All we know is that:
- there were some remarkably sloppy shots made.
- Jayson said it was an easy table.
- after Jayson's 714, the table was dismantled.
They did.The Legends group could have resolved these questions at the very beginning of each player's sessions, but seemed to argue that it was nobody's business but theirs.
You don’t like it?"Shane will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
It was same table."Ruslan will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Earl will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
"Jayson will be starting soon, but first let's show you the room and the table (camera pans 360" around the table). This table has XXX cloth, and the pockets are (camera pans down to pocket where a tape measure is held) x inches wide at the mouth, y inches at the throat, and the shelf is z inches deep."
The title of this thread is “John’s run legit?”If you are not apart of their 'semi public' thats is OK, also if you have a table and practice 14.1 on a regular basis - your opinion is valuable to me. Please note that I do like Westerns - just not the one schmidt, charlie and the bca are TRYING to produce. If yer a member of john's facebook crowd - yer opinion has less value. Only honest answers are appreciated - I am passionate about the game and keeping it legit so I again I'm only interested in reading genuine responses. Thanks for your participation in what is very possibly another media experiment on the 'general public'. So is it legit? Or do you think (like me) it had a great deal to do with his recent new cue sponsor and hall of fame induction? Also do ya'll think they ( crooked powrs that b) have a legal right to make such a grandiose claim and not offer the video to general population - as proof of their 'claim'?
Legal document huh? Maybe xrd will ask you to inform us under which set of laws it resides?What low iq people such ass yerself would call crying - I would call a Sports History Preservation Observation - another idea that a snowflake like u would knot b able to appreciate is that Mosconi's 526 is actually a legal document. So again u are being a troll in this thread, If u no care bout USA's Sports History Records - I suggest taking yer cancel culture busyness elsewhere. Much has been learned about how Pocket Billiard records are kept and or Standardized/ adjudicated here in USA - through this thread - again if u no like smell of my cookin - find another campsite - u will only continue to make yerself look stupid - while partissypatin in this thread.
LOL you kneel at the altar of Mosconi with every post.xradarx doesn’t kowtow.
Oooo, what a witty reply.You ain’t fit to kiss his dead ass, schit nut-hugger.
I suggest you get this book, you need better material.Go suck back up to Schmidt, he fits you like your glove.
He was a legend.Didn’t need the books or movies.
I knew the MAN.
Interesting video. I have seen it before but never noticed that the kid shooting potatoes played lefty and I believe Willie was a right handed player.
Enjoy.
Make it happen son.Sorry, schmidty said he couldn’t make chicken salad out of chicken shit, but that he was selling a lot of tooth brushes to his customers, and finally making money from pocket pool.