98. In the early 90s. Now maybe 6.What's your high run in straight pool? Maybe that would be a more fun bet.
I'm lucky if I get to 20.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
98. In the early 90s. Now maybe 6.What's your high run in straight pool? Maybe that would be a more fun bet.
I'm lucky if I get to 20.
People keep talking about "aim" and "stroke," but "sighting" and "alignment" are also critical. To be a good potter, one must have accurate and consistent:
1.) aiming
2.) sighting
3.) alignment
4.) stroke
And one must also know how to compensate aim for squirt, swerve and throw when appropriate.
Enjoy the resources linked,
Dave
Each person picks 50 shots. We do all 100 and whomever does them all in the least amount of attempts wins.I didn't know if you meant to pick 25 each for 50 total, or pick 50 each for 100 total. Which is it?
Dam does not and it is not an aiming system.Any high-level "aiming system" should address all of these issues. DAM most certainly does.
Regards,
Dave
98. In the early 90s. Now maybe 6.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Guess you will need to bet something to find out.Sorry, I don't buy it. Unless you farted out a 98 high on acid, there's no way your game could deteriorate so much that you can only run 6 now. You never lose the knowledge it takes to run that many, so you should be able to run more than 6 with a broom handle.
Either the 98 is wrong or the 6 is.
Guess you will need to bet something to find out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Ha Ha. I'm not going down that rat's next like Lou did. Nooooo waaaayyy!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-GHOSTBA...480332?hash=item20fbcd2a0c:g:f84AAOxy5rpSSzWMAny high-level "aiming system" should address all of these issues. DAM most certainly does.
Regards,
Dave
Why not? Lou won.
If we look at the hours it took to make and then argue about the game, the $10,000 works out to less than minimum wage, not even accounting for backers, travel costs, etc.
I wish the forum had LIKE buttons. Glad it's not this tough to match up in the poolroom.You are bickering with him on here right now for nothing.
How much you getting paid for that?
Maybe he will come to where you are at. You could go home at night and wouldn't have any travel costs. Maybe he will even bring you a sack lunch, so you won't have to go out and eat.
He sounds eager. Eagerness doesn't necessarily equate to making the best deals. Maybe you could put up a couple chili cheese corndogs against one of his cheaper cases.
Guess you will need to bet something to find out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
You are bickering with him on here right now for nothing.
How much you getting paid for that?
I just said I can't run 6. Plus it's been pointed out how horrible my stroke is and that I likely will never progress to c player level.i like a lil action with folks i enjoy
next time you come through the memphis area i don't think you'll 60 in 5 tries on a 9' diamond table in the largest local room
i'll bet wholesale $$$ against one of your fancier cases of my choice or i'd buy the case @ retail if that's your preference, so, it's nothing big and certainly not worth a special trip
if you decline by communicating or not responding i won't disparage you in any way
window is open for 6 mos
best, a
I disagree. If people want to decide for themselves, they can read about DAM and compare it to all of the other "aiming systems" on the aiming systems resource page. I personally think DAM is the closest to what most top players do.Dam does not and it is not an aiming system.People keep talking about "aim" and "stroke," but "sighting" and "alignment" are also critical. To be a good potter, one must have accurate and consistent:
1.) aiming
2.) sighting
3.) alignment
4.) stroke
And one must also know how to compensate aim for squirt, swerve and throw when appropriate.
Enjoy the resources linked,
Dave
Any high-level "aiming system" should address all of these issues. DAM most certainly does.
You have not studied imaginary numbers, obviously.
In Imaginary challenges that is correct. 50 + 50 = 50
I disagree. If people want to decide for themselves, they can read about DAM and compare it to all of the other "aiming systems" on the aiming systems resource page. I personally think DAM is the closest to what most top players do.
Regards,
Dave
I think that's true only if they're 120 degrees apart. At least that's what my carom buddy Lenny Euler told me a long time ago. Kind of like a nine-ball rack.
Your disagreement is noted and yet you are still wrong.