Awesome Posts, Bb!!!!
jay helfert said:Don Willis said that Wimpy was the one player he would bet his money on and go to sleep and not worry about it. He had that much faith in Luther winning. I'm pretty sure he would have said that Wimpy was the best of the two of them. But Willis was the far better hustler. Luther only knew one thing, NEVER MISS! He didn't know how to stall and he always looked for the best players.
Luther could also play great 14.1, and would run 90's and 100's in nearly every match he played. Check his record from Johnston City and the Stardust. No one else is even close. And guys like Balsis, Crane and Moore were there. All great Straight Pool players, but Lassiter was the best. I watched one year at Johnston City all his matches. He must have run a 90 or better every match, and they were only going to 125. He was a machine once he got going. He just didn't miss any balls. If he got two inches out of line, he was pissed.
Fast Lenny said:Earl was the best ever in 9 ball,he made Wimpy cry.![]()
grindz said:I heard that story during Earls' exhibition here that you taped. I'm not sure if he 'got' it or not. It is hard to unless you have been alive long enough to devote your life to anything, be the best and then watch your skills fade with age. Then along with that you see that thing become bastardized and lose its' (what you percieve to be its') beauty.
All I could think of when listening to Earl was that I hoped he could see the irony. If you watched you'll know what I mean.
Brings a quote you used to my mind. When you told someone that even if they beat you, you were still the best. :wink: It made me laugh out loud because in our match I felt (stlll do...but don't feel the need to prove it) the same way!!! LOL I'm sure that Wimpy did with Earl too!!!!!!! Don't you?
You will see it when you are older....I guarantee it.![]()
td
jay helfert said:Wimpy was the best of his era, from the 50's to the early 70's. For about a 20 year period he was considered the best 9-Ball player by his peers. He was a lot like Buddy from the 70's to the 90's, a great tournament player and money player as well. I can only think of one player in the 60's willing to gamble with Wimpy and that was Harold Worst.
The same for Buddy during his reign, no one wanted to gamble with him. Even great shooters like Denny Searcy and Greg Stevens steered a wide berth around Buddy Hall. Buddy was giving weight to the world. Dan Louie is the only player who I ever heard of beating Buddy even. It was on an 8' table. He wouldn't play Buddy on a nine footer.
So no one is invincible, they are all human. But one or two stand out above the crowd in every generation. They are the ones who stand the test of time. Wimpy stood out in his era and Buddy in his. Their respective careers over lapped for a moment, but when Buddy was young he wouldn't tangle with Wimpy. And when Wimpy got old, he left Buddy alone. Great players who respected each other and their place in pool history.
wahcheck said:Hi Jay....how would you compare Lassiter to Mosconi for 14.1 straight pool?
grindz said:Harold doesn't get talked about much because of his early death. He DEFINITELY needed to be mentioned. Wish I could have witnessed his game in person. I do remember my Dad taking me to the funural home when he passed....but that was all I knew of him, until much later.
td
td
jay helfert said:He deserves more than just a mention. He may have been the greatest player ever to hold a cue! He could play any and all games and find a way to beat you. He feared no one and loved a challenge. He was like the Efren of his era. Show him a new game and in one week he would be playing the best players in the world and in two weeks he would be beating them.
It was the world professional championship in Argentina. According to the stories, he was lucky to get out of town alive, and probably wasn't looking for action right after.Nostroke said:Didnt (Harold Worst) win a huge 3c tourny in Brasil or somewhere- ...
jay helfert said:I played Wimpy in Gil Atkisson's tourney in Los Angeles in 1976. He was not the player he had been anymore. He did beat me 11-8 just on intimidation alone. I had many chances to win. He did finish fourth in that tourney, and that's the last one I saw him play in until the Legends events in the 80's. And he still won both of those.
jay helfert said:Wimpy was the best of his era, from the 50's to the early 70's. For about a 20 year period he was considered the best 9-Ball player by his peers. He was a lot like Buddy from the 70's to the 90's, a great tournament player and money player as well. I can only think of one player in the 60's willing to gamble with Wimpy and that was Harold Worst.
The same for Buddy during his reign, no one wanted to gamble with him. Even great shooters like Denny Searcy and Greg Stevens steered a wide berth around Buddy Hall. Buddy was giving weight to the world. Dan Louie is the only player who I ever heard of beating Buddy even. It was on an 8' table. He wouldn't play Buddy on a nine footer.
So no one is invincible, they are all human. But one or two stand out above the crowd in every generation. They are the ones who stand the test of time. Wimpy stood out in his era and Buddy in his. Their respective careers over lapped for a moment, but when Buddy was young he wouldn't tangle with Wimpy. And when Wimpy got old, he left Buddy alone. Great players who respected each other and their place in pool history.
jay helfert said:Wimpy was the best of his era, from the 50's to the early 70's. For about a 20 year period he was considered the best 9-Ball player by his peers. He was a lot like Buddy from the 70's to the 90's, a great tournament player and money player as well. I can only think of one player in the 60's willing to gamble with Wimpy and that was Harold Worst.
The same for Buddy during his reign, no one wanted to gamble with him. Even great shooters like Denny Searcy and Greg Stevens steered a wide berth around Buddy Hall. Buddy was giving weight to the world. Dan Louie is the only player who I ever heard of beating Buddy even. It was on an 8' table. He wouldn't play Buddy on a nine footer.
So no one is invincible, they are all human. But one or two stand out above the crowd in every generation. They are the ones who stand the test of time. Wimpy stood out in his era and Buddy in his. Their respective careers over lapped for a moment, but when Buddy was young he wouldn't tangle with Wimpy. And when Wimpy got old, he left Buddy alone. Great players who respected each other and their place in pool history.
When topics like this are talked about here, I always wait for Terry to chime in with cold hard historical facts. Always makes for a great read.Terry Ardeno said:3 things make a GREAT player.
1. Tournaments won
2. Gambling prowess
3. Longevity.
In my opinion, Luther Lassiter was the greatest 9 baller to ever play. Earl was the the best tournament 9 baller, but Luther beats him in gambling ability as well as longevity.
As for background on Luther Lassiter, he was born on Nov 5, 1918 and died at age 69 on Oct 25, 1988. He was a great player by the time he was in his 20s, but, in the 1940's and 1950's, there were hardly any major 9 ball tournaments being held. By the time the Johnson City tournaments came into being starting in 1961, Lassiter was already a legendary road player. Starting in 1962 (the 1st Johnson City 9 ball tournament) Lassiter dominated the field and won the first of his 6 World 9 ball championships. These Johnson City and Stardust tournaments were the defacto World Championships and they had fields that included Harold Worst, Ed Kelly, Irving Crane, Joe Balsis, Ronnie Allen, Danny Jones, Eddie Taylor, Larry Johnson, Jim Marino, Buddy Hall and many other great players. Lassiter won titles in 1962, 1963, 1964, 1967, 1969 and 1971. Keep in mind that at this time, he was 44 in 1962 and 53 in 1971....His peak as a player was argueably past, yet he still beat very, very talented players.
Now, not only was he a great TOURNAMENT player, he was also one of the greatest MONEY players that ever lived. His favorite game was "money pool", any game he could bet on. Believe me when I tell you this, his game went UP several notches for the cash. Some players play better in tournaments than they do when they gamble, and others, visa-versa. Lassiter was a better money player than a tournament player.
So, put those two facts together, add in his longevity at the top (30+ years) and I can make a very strong case for him. This of course does not take into consideration his 4 outright World 14.1 Championships, PLUS 5 14.1 Championships at Johnson City, 5 World All-Around Championships and 1 World 1 Pocket Championship and you have a very gifted player indeed.
As for Strickland, I call him the greatest tournament 9 baller since Lassiter and he may in fact be Lassiter's equal at TOURNAMENT 9 ball. His 6 World Championships and 5 U.S. Open 9 Ball Championships is a record that I believe we will not see broken, ever. Look how hard it is for anyone to repeat or win those majors more than once. But Strickland, even though early in his career he did gamble at pool, at GAMBLING he was no match for Lassiter. So, you have two very special tournament players and one of them (Lassiter) also exceled at gambling 9 ball, so the edge, I believe, has to go to Lassiter.
As for Efren Reyes, he also has a special title. The greatest all around player to have ever played pocket billiards. He was a great 9 baller, but not "the GREATEST" and here is what I base that opinion on. In the two major championships at 9 Ball, Efren has 1 World 9 Ball Championship in 1999 and 1 U.S. Open 9 Ball Championship in 1994. Sigel has 5 WC and 3 US Open's, Varner has 3 WC and back-to-back US Open titles. Archer, Hall, Souquet and Allen Hopkins have combined major 9 ball titles greater than Reyes' 2. BUT, Reyes also has 6 World 8 Ball Championships, he is the greatest Rotation player ever, in my opinion the greatest 1 pocket player ever and he is super at 14.1. Overall, Reyes is better than Lassiter and Strickland, but not at 9 ball.
Consider this....Lassiter won 6 World 9 Ball Championships from the age of 44 till he was 53. He would have won how many more had there been 9 ball tournaments in the 2 previous decades. But there weren't any.
So, if he won 6 World Chamionships 20 years after his prime, what would he have been like from the 1940's to 1960's?
Compare that to Reyes, who has one (1) World 9 Ball Championship, in an era where for 10 plus years, there were 2 "World 9 Ball Championships" available every year! And Reyes has a total of 1. Lassiter, who didn't have tournaments to compete in until he was 44, still won 6 of them.
These are just MY opinions and many other fans and historians who love and study the game as much as I do may have differing opinions. But, once I collected all the info that I had on these great players, I feel very confident in my selections of who was better at what.
SCCues said:OK Jay, I respect your opinion more than most others. Who would you say is the top 9 ball player now of the many who play great today? I know it's just an opinion, but yours carries a lot of weight.
James
jay helfert said:Hard to say who the best is. I like Orcollo's game a lot and a few other filipinos are right there too. But the guy who impresses me the most right now is young Mr. Wu from Taipei. He is the Zen Master of pool today in my book. And his buddy Yang from Taipei is nearly as good. Yang has the experience as does Orcollo, but Wu is on another level when he is on his game, which is most of the time. Kind of like Earl 15-20 years ago, just a notch above the rest of the world.