cashin said:Earl has missed every shot he has shot at. He dogged the lagg and every shot since. Europe leads 5 to 0 .. in a race to 6. Shane will be glad to shed Earl .. that's for sure.
Jude Rosenstock said:I hate seeing posts like this.
See, the most common way we view professional pool now is in tournament format. That is to say, we are watching matches that are in the late stages that consists of players that are playing well.
What automatically gets filtered out are players shooting poorly. In fact, we don't even THINK about them when all is said and done. Nobody keeps track of all the great players that go two and out in the US Open. They only know what happened in the final 4 or 5 matches and that's NOT representative of what professional pool can be like.
What is remarkably interesting about the Mosconi Cup is that every match gets tons of focus and there are moments when you realize professionals don't always post .900 accustats. Some sets they stink. What makes them GREAT, what separates them from the second tier of talent is that usually, no matter how much they were stinking before, that can change in an instant. I'm not defending Earl nor do I really care if he has a good showing or not. I'm just saying, you don't count out players of his caliber so soon. They're champions for a reason.
av84fun said:Double Tap.
av84fun said:Double Tap.
CTYankee said:For a guy that sucks... he sure is making some nice shots right now.
Jude Rosenstock said:I hate seeing posts like this.
See, the most common way we view professional pool now is in tournament format. That is to say, we are watching matches that are in the late stages that consists of players that are playing well.
What automatically gets filtered out are players shooting poorly. In fact, we don't even THINK about them when all is said and done. Nobody keeps track of all the great players that go two and out in the US Open. They only know what happened in the final 4 or 5 matches and that's NOT representative of what professional pool can be like.
What is remarkably interesting about the Mosconi Cup is that every match gets tons of focus and there are moments when you realize professionals don't always post .900 accustats. Some sets they stink. What makes them GREAT, what separates them from the second tier of talent is that usually, no matter how much they were stinking before, that can change in an instant. I'm not defending Earl nor do I really care if he has a good showing or not. I'm just saying, you don't count out players of his caliber so soon. They're champions for a reason.
CTYankee said:For a guy that sucks... he sure is making some nice shots right now.
Terry Ardeno said:A man who won 6 World 9 Ball Championships, 5 U.S. Open 9 Ball Championships, a World 8 Ball Championship and a plethera of other tournaments will never suck.
Jude Rosenstock said:I hate seeing posts like this.
See, the most common way we view professional pool now is in tournament format. That is to say, we are watching matches that are in the late stages that consists of players that are playing well.
What automatically gets filtered out are players shooting poorly. In fact, we don't even THINK about them when all is said and done. Nobody keeps track of all the great players that go two and out in the US Open. They only know what happened in the final 4 or 5 matches and that's NOT representative of what professional pool can be like.
What is remarkably interesting about the Mosconi Cup is that every match gets tons of focus and there are moments when you realize professionals don't always post .900 accustats. Some sets they stink. What makes them GREAT, what separates them from the second tier of talent is that usually, no matter how much they were stinking before, that can change in an instant. I'm not defending Earl nor do I really care if he has a good showing or not. I'm just saying, you don't count out players of his caliber so soon. They're champions for a reason.
Jude Rosenstock said:I hate seeing posts like this.
See, the most common way we view professional pool now is in tournament format. That is to say, we are watching matches that are in the late stages that consists of players that are playing well.
What automatically gets filtered out are players shooting poorly. In fact, we don't even THINK about them when all is said and done. Nobody keeps track of all the great players that go two and out in the US Open. They only know what happened in the final 4 or 5 matches and that's NOT representative of what professional pool can be like.
What is remarkably interesting about the Mosconi Cup is that every match gets tons of focus and there are moments when you realize professionals don't always post .900 accustats. Some sets they stink. What makes them GREAT, what separates them from the second tier of talent is that usually, no matter how much they were stinking before, that can change in an instant. I'm not defending Earl nor do I really care if he has a good showing or not. I'm just saying, you don't count out players of his caliber so soon. They're champions for a reason.
bignasty said:earl is a great player. at 1 time earl was 1 of the best players in the world! earl gives 110% everytime he goes out there! the problem is when earls 110% isnt good enough to win thats when he gets upset! i was there when shane pounded earl and i wish all of you could have been in that room after he got beat! he was the epitamy of polite and was grecious in defeat! had nothing bad to say about anyone! he evan explained how diffacult it was to go from the best to being average on tour! and if you would of been there you would of seen a champion player from the past! passing the torch to a young kid that looked up to him for 15 years! when he stated that he never thought his record of 5 open titles could be beat, and he turned his head and looked at shane and said,"but this kid he was born to play pool,and he might just win the next 5 in a row,and i hope he does" and that is why i say earl is still a champion!