Badpenguin
Well-known member
Other sports, especially snooker, have no relevance to a discussion of pool. They are different games/sports.By your definition events such as The World Pool Masters and The Masters in snooker would simply be exhibitions, yet both are considered 'Majors' in their respective disciplines and any player who wins won is considered to be top tier (I would also point out that broadcasters often comment on a player's Mosconi appearances and/or victories when discussing career highlights). However of course that is your opinion, so be it.
I believe that getting invited to the World Pool Masters requires you to sign a contract with matchroom. The results of it have no bearing in any internationally recognized rankings or records.
Or, maybe he pulled out due to the event in Qatar? Who knows? No one knows, that's who.Filler isn't there clearly for some kind of contractual or PR issue, we don't know that 100%, but equally we kind of do.
Agreed, both sides are facing the gaff pockets.That said, I do agree with you on the pocket sizes, pool isn't snooker and snookerising it doesn't really make sense, we have Chinese 8-Ball if we really wanted to watch pool on a snooker table. I would rather they were a bit bigger, 4.25 seems to be a sensible size to me (however to re-iterate, just because I think that would provide a better spectacle that doesn't make it a valid excuse for either side).
Last edited: