I read the comments on other Mosconi Cup threads from posters about 10 Ball, longer races, more teams and I think that there is a basic misunderstanding of what the Mosconi Cup is.
Matchroom produce pool shows that people actually want to watch. In that light the MC is not broke so doesn't need fixing.
So forget about the unnecessary fixes from the armchair keyboard jockeys.
Over half the matches were solved by the deciding rack and some of them clawed back from three and four rack deficits. That is exciting and creates interest.
In addition many of the complaints regarding streaming of the event are levelled at Matchroom.
But the fact is that these streams are parasites preying on this tournament. Who pays the $100,000+ prize money to the players along with their food, accommodation and gets them and their families there. Who pays Michaela and Nigel? The J Team (Jay, Jim and Jerry)? Who pays.......?
Who pays........?
Is the answer to any of these questions …......the streamers?
No it is Matchroom and Sky Sports who pick up the tab.
So viewers who complain of streaming should live with the fact that cheapskate solutions sometimes don't always perform. The Mosconi Cup is sold to broadcasters in many parts of the world but the USA lack a TV mogul with the vision to acquire the event so that those unfortunate to experience the shortcomings of Pirate Pool can see the Real Deal.
The criticism of the partisan crowd ? Well if you prefer your pool to be of the sterile variety then give The Mosconi Cup a wide berth. It is an intercontinental event and in most sports that means that people have feeling and pride in their team. The cacophony is good natured with most of it the work of Bruce and his small, enthusiastic band of
kilt wearing Scots. But they are a great bunch of guys and the
referees have their fingers on the pulse.
Classic quotes from La Tabb:
The next person to shout out while a player is down on the shot will be watching the rest of the tournament at home
or to a helpful spectator,
I'll do the shusshing thank you
Matchroom produce pool shows that people actually want to watch. In that light the MC is not broke so doesn't need fixing.
So forget about the unnecessary fixes from the armchair keyboard jockeys.
Over half the matches were solved by the deciding rack and some of them clawed back from three and four rack deficits. That is exciting and creates interest.
In addition many of the complaints regarding streaming of the event are levelled at Matchroom.
But the fact is that these streams are parasites preying on this tournament. Who pays the $100,000+ prize money to the players along with their food, accommodation and gets them and their families there. Who pays Michaela and Nigel? The J Team (Jay, Jim and Jerry)? Who pays.......?
Who pays........?
Is the answer to any of these questions …......the streamers?
No it is Matchroom and Sky Sports who pick up the tab.
So viewers who complain of streaming should live with the fact that cheapskate solutions sometimes don't always perform. The Mosconi Cup is sold to broadcasters in many parts of the world but the USA lack a TV mogul with the vision to acquire the event so that those unfortunate to experience the shortcomings of Pirate Pool can see the Real Deal.
The criticism of the partisan crowd ? Well if you prefer your pool to be of the sterile variety then give The Mosconi Cup a wide berth. It is an intercontinental event and in most sports that means that people have feeling and pride in their team. The cacophony is good natured with most of it the work of Bruce and his small, enthusiastic band of
kilt wearing Scots. But they are a great bunch of guys and the
referees have their fingers on the pulse.
Classic quotes from La Tabb:
The next person to shout out while a player is down on the shot will be watching the rest of the tournament at home
or to a helpful spectator,
I'll do the shusshing thank you