Arguments like this are so difficult to win in pool, because unlike golf or tennis or other established individual sports, all the best players don't play against each other except maybe once or twice a year. If there were four or five "majors" a year that anybody who's anybody in pool played in, we'd be able to really know how Feijen stacks up against the rest of the top 20 or 30 in the world.
As it is, all these arguments are pretty much baseless conjecture. We know he's mind-blowingly good at pool. We know that when he plays others that are mind-blowingly good, he sometimes wins, sometimes loses.
Anyway, that said, I'd back him against Archer or Strickland. I think those two have made everyone's list because of how they used to play, not how they've played for the past year or two.
-Andrew
As it is, all these arguments are pretty much baseless conjecture. We know he's mind-blowingly good at pool. We know that when he plays others that are mind-blowingly good, he sometimes wins, sometimes loses.
Anyway, that said, I'd back him against Archer or Strickland. I think those two have made everyone's list because of how they used to play, not how they've played for the past year or two.
-Andrew