...And I just don't get why someone with such resume would use overseas made blanks after having cues shown in the Smithsonian Museum... To sell them as $2000 cues after building cues in the $20,000+ range? Yeah right.
Presuming that your assertion is correct and I have not seen the proof that it is may I ask what the problem would be with using blanks made anywhere in the world?
Is there some reason that you feel that Mr. Drexler would not be fully aware of the quality of the parts he is using in his cues and be fully confident in delivering the finished product to the customer?
If we are to take a $2000 cue as an example then the cost of the blank is not really an issue is it? Nor is the place that the blank is made an issue unless the quality level is not sufficient to withstand the test of time.
If we are to assume that a blank from a place like Prather's Cue Parts costs $100 and another blank from Asia Cue Parts ltd. costs $20 and the cue maker has tested both and found them to be substantially similar and both are acceptable then what is the issue? When I am giving $2000 to a cue maker like Mr. Drexler I do not ever feel the need, or have I ever felt the need with any of my direct purchases from cue makers or dealers, to ascertain where all the parts for the cue originated.
Titlists were made in the millions in a factory setting. I would think that current blanks coming from Asia would be at least as good as those which were made in the Brunswick factory. At least this is my opinion based on the factory brands I see coming out of Asia which have sharp points and hardwood veneers. Most of them that I see appear to be as good or better than most the Titlists that I have seen. Granted Mr. Bredan I have not, nor do I intend to ever dissect and inspect any cue so my opinion is purely speculative.
I find the accusation however disturbing as if Mr. Drexler would be in the wrong for charging a lot for using overseas blanks when your tone suggests that you would not have a problem were he using those produced in the USA. I feel that this unfairly maligns both Mr. Drexler and the blank providers.
In my mind if a cue maker is as highly regarded as Mr. Drexler is then he is fully qualified to determine which parts are of sufficient quality to put in his cues regardless of where they are made. Personally I find it to be a major compliment to Asian cue manufacturing if they are producing blanks which are good enough to be used in high end cues.
I have seen it mentioned that Mr. Jack Justis uses imported interiors in his cue cases. Still his cases are regarded as the best of the best. Judging by the wealth of cues on display here and the list of Justis case owners it has to be assumed that those owners feel that Mr. Justis' cases offer adequate protection for their cues. And Mr. Justis obviously feels that way as well. So if Mr. Justis can be allowed to use overseas made interior parts why is Mr. Drexler or any cue maker forbidden from using parts made any where in the world?
Thank you in advance for further elaboration Mr. Bredan should you care to give it.