Exactly. At least give it a go first. If it's a blow-out then readjust if need be.That would be a quick way to get on my "do not play" list. Ask me for weight, and then ask for more if I agree?
Exactly. At least give it a go first. If it's a blow-out then readjust if need be.That would be a quick way to get on my "do not play" list. Ask me for weight, and then ask for more if I agree?
I know i have a better chance with a shorter race...like i said i win 1 out of 3 on average. I won the hot seat one night just because i got in a lucky draw on the weak side of the bracketYou have a better chance winning a race to 2 or 4 then say 9 against a better player. Don't think you're delusional but some of your logic is off.
Im following the advice of playing against opponents that are better than me, but Im struggling to find a balance between taking my losses and growing from them, and being frustrated and disappointed by the losses.
I'm not delusional enough to think that i should be winning against opponents that i know are much better than me, and much more experienced than I am, but I also try to approach the matches with confidence that i can win, which turns in to a bit of a mind fuck.
Any advice on playing up, staying positive/confident, but having realistic expectations?
Thanks
Fair enough. I was a bit lazy in my post. What I mean is, if I ask for weight and you beat me pretty easily. I'm going to ask for more later.That would be a quick way to get on my "do not play" list. Ask me for weight, and then ask for more if I agree?
...
Im definitely improving, but sometimes I question whether I should be practicing vs getting my ass kicked in the tournaments against superior players for the time being.
Just the first paragraph alone is gold.My advice on game play...: Tighten up your difference engine. If you're not >85% to pot the ball and get the desired shape (be honest), then play safe. Stronger players expect the weak to sell out. Opting more often than not, not to take risks, even minor, will irritate them to testing their luck to make something happen. Trust me
My advice on gleaning something from the challenge...: What I do to gauge the spd of a player, is to identify the potential hazards on the table and note how they handle them or fall victim. At your level this will appear to be a mix of pattern play vs whacky CB movement. Your opponent's table IQ will play a role as well, but until you have a grasp of their capabilities, you're not going to be able to gauge what's a move vs a blunder. Seeing how they work a table to manage problems will be the knowledge you want to adopt in your own game. Pay attention or don't bother.
The reality here is there's nothing to be learnt donating rather than just watching. You're better served to watch a pair of top shots mixing it up and buying them both a drink, then pulling cash out of your wallet. The cold hard truth is that the top shot is only going to do what he needs to do to win against someone your spd. That includes taking greater risk and playing weaker safes. Watch the top players trade shots if you want to learn what the good moves are.
Playing stronger players only tests your will and performance under pressure. If you want to challenge yourself, there's nothing wrong with it and I'd still encourage it. However I don't think playing in these situations when wanting to develop table IQ will provide much if anything, over just observing.
@Bob Jewett is coming through your town, B. Stick a booger on him. I hear he's good, but I'm betting on you.When I'm fortunate enough to be gambling against a weaker player, there is no pressure. Being down and making a "comeback" is a way you keep a customer.
I was getting frustrated the other night playing weaker players, you know the ones, barely make shots but always roll the cue ball where I barely have a makeable shot, let alone play position. Then I got an opponent who was better than me, I had much more fun losing to him than winning in those other games because it was an exciting game.Another thought: Instead of thinking of success as beating the guy and failure as losing, it's worth recognizing that success can mean playing well and giving the guy a hard time. In your situation, this is just objectively true, I think.
I once played an exhibition game against the UK's #1 ranked player, and though I lost, I played great. One shot in particular I was very proud of. I consider that experience overall a big success (albeit tinged with regret for blowing a chance to win).
I probably need 7 out...I barely played for 2 years. Mourning the loss of Salt City Billiards and what was left of pool in this god forsaken town.@Bob Jewett is coming through your town, B. Stick a booger on him. I hear he's good, but I'm betting on you.
Yeah, we don't like it eitherI probably need 7 out...I barely played for 2 years. Mourning the loss of Salt City Billiards and what was left of pool in this god forsaken town.
Now that I've just about emptied the room...it's really hitting home.
Oh i have had my life back 2 years....and now it's even more so.Yeah, we don't like it either
Hopefully it is soon a life improvement.
Have you ever had someone check your fundamentals? Maybe there is something there that would be simple to fix once diagnosed..... Any advice on playing up, staying positive/confident, but having realistic expectations? ....
Nope. That nine ball is a young man's game. But I'll try you at 10-6 and bet what you like.I probably need 7 out...I barely played for 2 years.. ...
Yes. If you have a supportive peer group, learning can be much more efficient. This of course presumes the student is there to learn. Some people just want to win. You can't skip from crawl to win. Speaking of winners, a good percentage of the winners just want to collect. This is not a good deal by any scale.I find that the best people to practice with are the ones who play you about even.
That way you push each other to be better because, nobody wants to lose to a guy they can beat!
Play for a little something, and you'll both probably get better. You want a guy to "push" you to win, not demolish you.
Also, play in as many tournaments as you can, to work on nerves and stamina.
As far as the "you need to lose to better players to get better", it's bs.
In this day and age, youtube will teach you waaaayyyyyy more useful stuff than will losing your lunch money to better players.
Watch the pros play 10-ball. It is the most thorough skilled, common game imo. Lots of strategy.
9-ball is a waste of time to play or watch. Even 8-ball is better, especially at the amateur level.
And the days of "you need to pay your dues" are long over. Guys that feed you that line are just after your cash, not trying to teach you.
I mentor lots of players in my region, and I try to pair similarly skilled players to practice with each other.
You can play the better guys if you want but, to steadily improve, I find playing against peers works better. You push each other.
Learning to win is what it's all about.Yes. If you have a supportive peer group, learning can be much more efficient. This of course presumes the student is there to learn. Some people just want to win. You can't skip from crawl to win. Speaking of winners, a good percentage of the winners just want to collect. This is not a good deal by any scale.
The armchair ideal is acquire an accurate overview and work at it.
All the pressure is on the better player until the worse player gets at the finish line then the pressure is on them.Is that true or just a myth that all the pressure is on the better players? Sounds very cliche.
I think it's more dependent on the individual whose the better players than just a blanket statement.