Quality life of professional players

The IPT years or low work high payout events are classic.

A big roller like KT is something few can emulate well. The knockoffs follow in smaller and cheaper styles. They don't want to risk it for the quick payoff like KT, such is the beginning of competition wars. The first batch of imitators will look good since everyone is coming off the IPT high. Just a matter of time till they find someone to pony around.

Can you translated this for me? I'm trying to figure out just what you are trying to say?
 
Can you translated this for me? I'm trying to figure out just what you are trying to say?

IPT -> goes bust after 3 years
{
IPT imitator 1, IPT imitator 2, IPT imitator 3, IPT imitator 4
}
imitator 1 focuses on prize money
imitator 2 focuses on match ups or "world class battles"
imitator 3 focuses on a balance of prize money and matchups
imitator 4 promotes a single player

Each specialize in a component of the IPT blueprint. A bust means imitator sees how easy the scam is and decides to try it out.
 
In other US sports which remain nameless, the recruiters get people put them into lifestyles and manage their expenses. At which point if a player survives the first few years, they hand off management to a private or higher end financial manager.

Regardless the result in most of the popular cases are investments are made and people do not enjoy the good life after they make an investment in most cases. Usually money managers talk a good game but spend money on their friends for companies to put on a good show for the investor and then bleed them until the people want to relax.

I will not mention names but the popular ones are well documented.

The cases where it "actually worked" are usually part of the show, or people enjoying being bled.

The worst is when some country folk come into the city and their heart of gold turns to a chest pain or heart attack because of what they think "they did" or "what they should've done sooner."

Indeed, money managers by and large do a poor job assisting folks to prepare for their future. Just look at the investment products that they peddle. They are designed to siphon wealth from the client to their account. If you doubt me, just ask any random commission based advisor for a detailed list of their fees and commissions then compute what that will cost you PER YEAR. Then ask them how they intend on delivering alpha to your investment returns. They will not be able to answer. In fact, I doubt that most "advisors" even know what alpha is. I know that this is loosely related to the topic, but those who serve Mammon make me ill...
 
Concerning top players winnings, even adding sponsorship, besides expenses you have to take out taxes as well...
So what does that leave a world champion as a clear profit over a year? 50k?
Are we joking?
With no health insurance in it and no pension, nothing for a secure seniorship?
In a game played by millions?
In a game when a champion reaches the top of the world?..

Things can be a lot better than that, we should never stop believing in it, it just needs different mentality, a forward approach by sponsors..
Just form a premier league like in Snooker and promote it, take it from there!
Hire Snooker people to organize it if you can't!

But as I wrote already, some people that organize Pool will always want to keep it small so they can control it. It's so easy to suck up the blood of sucker players with so light work they do and still make a good living out of it.

The suckers (all of us, champions as well) deticate and give so much for the art of Pool we literally love and get almost nothing in return.. Except personal emotional satisfaction..

Young kids see that after a while, so why should they play Pool especially when there are so many things to do nowdays?
"Definition of missed opportunity" - the story of Pool...
 
Last edited:
Indeed, money managers by and large do a poor job assisting folks to prepare for their future. Just look at the investment products that they peddle. They are designed to siphon wealth from the client to their account. If you doubt me, just ask any random commission based advisor for a detailed list of their fees and commissions then compute what that will cost you PER YEAR. Then ask them how they intend on delivering alpha to your investment returns. They will not be able to answer. In fact, I doubt that most "advisors" even know what alpha is. I know that this is loosely related to the topic, but those who serve Mammon make me ill...

The terms I hear from advisors are its a "six sigma investment, see that one olive in the drink well they don't need it we can save money that way,..., we are going to cut the fat from your portfolio and keep the muscle, we just want your account to stand on its own two feet so you don't have to do anything." Mostly peddling you to stay away from self-managing the finances while increasing the demand for advisor services.

Should you want to be in control ask for the paperwork and balance sheets no explanation until after the reading is done. Otherwise they will have an epic tale to tell that can put Homer to shame (I've been reading French, hunchback of Notre Dame).
 
Self management of money is a skill that can be self taught. There are forums on just this.
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSocialize/asp/AllConv.asp?forumId=F100000015

Nobody cares more about managing your money than you should. In the pool world, most folks you meet are interested in making your money their money.

(edit) Yep...I'm just a banger who socializes. Don't try to get me in a money game...it ain't gonna happen.
One book I'd highly recommend for someone interested in learning the basics of money management and investing:

The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing
by Taylor Larimore, Mel Lindauer, and Michael LeBoeuf

That book should get you started into doing more reading on your own.


"control your destiny or somebody else will." -Jack Welch

No sales pitch here....just sayin' I was able to retire at age 48 by saving & investing. I'm no genius...only a high school degree. But I am a voracious reader who was fortunate enough to marry a like minded woman. It is my wife who manages our portfolio these days, and she does so well.

Nobody can help the player who wins then gambles it away. Perhaps they feel winning is too easy so they throw the money away.

TAP TAP TAP! The Bogleheads and Jack Bogle have helped more than a few achieve a successful (and often early) retirement.
 
Seems like what it really comes down to is you are very unlikely to find a pro pool player flyinng in first class.

Why is it so difficult for everyone to understand that for the huge majority, playing pool is not a reasonable career. Enjoy it for what it is...a game! It's something to do after work to relax. If you're pretty good at it, it's an opportunity to go out and play in a tournament on the weekend, have some fun, and maybe even pick up a few bucks.

It is the rare exception that you will find someone who can actually support himself or herself (much less a family) just playing pool. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's just a fact that it is extremely difficult for most people to make a living playing a game. Accept it. Enjoy it for what it is.

Steve
 
IPT -> goes bust after 3 years
{
IPT imitator 1, IPT imitator 2, IPT imitator 3, IPT imitator 4
}
imitator 1 focuses on prize money
imitator 2 focuses on match ups or "world class battles"
imitator 3 focuses on a balance of prize money and matchups
imitator 4 promotes a single player

Each specialize in a component of the IPT blueprint. A bust means imitator sees how easy the scam is and decides to try it out.

Actually the IPT was an imitator of what we were doing. After the tour imploded they tried to start doing one on one matches with the thought that it would be much less expensive and they could still get suckers to give up their CC info to the website. Only thing was it wasn't real, they had a budget that was unrealistic and the game that was being played was kind of silly. Plus it was the IPT.

It really is amazing how one person can know so little and post so much.
 
Actually the IPT was an imitator of what we were doing. After the tour imploded they tried to start doing one on one matches with the thought that it would be much less expensive and they could still get suckers to give up their CC info to the website. Only thing was it wasn't real, they had a budget that was unrealistic and the game that was being played was kind of silly. Plus it was the IPT.

It really is amazing how one person can know so little and post so much.

What do they say?- there are 3 types of people

1 Those that know what they know.
2 Those that know what they dont know
3 Those that don't know what they dont know. (sound like someone?)
 
What sadly amazes me in some posts is the lack of respect for Pool for what it is.. In a place where Pool is supposed to be fully respected..
Where has the awareness of really appreciating someone reaching the world title in pocket billiards gone?
"Fun game" is the only aspect of Pool when there are people practicing in freaking details every aspect of it for countless hours?
I wonder again if some people here do not advise young kids to ever think Pool as a career then why do THEY make profit of it?..
Oh I forgot: Players are to blame.. after spending so much in Pool and working so hard just to play better..
 
Seems like what it really comes down to is you are very unlikely to find a pro pool player flyinng in first class.

Why is it so difficult for everyone to understand that for the huge majority, playing pool is not a reasonable career. Enjoy it for what it is...a game! It's something to do after work to relax. If you're pretty good at it, it's an opportunity to go out and play in a tournament on the weekend, have some fun, and maybe even pick up a few bucks.

It is the rare exception that you will find someone who can actually support himself or herself (much less a family) just playing pool. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's just a fact that it is extremely difficult for most people to make a living playing a game. Accept it. Enjoy it for what it is.

Steve

From the looks of it without going into great detail a promoter can set up shop with a camera and pool table and handle sales while some well-trained talent gets muled, traveled around, for new productions in new areas. Alternatively is the pool tournament which has its own history of problems, I wish there were more records or articles of what happen in the past. Either case the people with the talent are letting people with cameras of advertising budgets scheme off of their talents, like most other production industries. I won't speculate too much about pool rooms but on average.

The point I am raising is talent versus marketing argument. Having talent draws a crowd but selling a product has greater potential for stealing money.
 
What sadly amazes me in some posts is the lack of respect for Pool for what it is.. In a place where Pool is supposed to be fully respected..
Where has the awareness of really appreciating someone reaching the world title in pocket billiards gone?
"Fun game" is the only aspect of Pool when there are people practicing in freaking details every aspect of it for countless hours?
I wonder again if some people here do not advise young kids to ever think Pool as a career then why do THEY make profit of it?..
Oh I forgot: Players are to blame.. after spending so much in Pool and working so hard just to play better..

I think most of us here do appreciate and respect the game of pool, and respect those who have developed the skill to play at the highest levels. However, and this is a big one, we are a very small group. So while we know from personal experience how much skill and work it takes to win a US Open or the Derby, very few people outside of our circle have a clue, or even care.
The guy who takes his date to the pool room Friday night, the couple who play league every Monday night, the Lawyer with the pooltable in his recreation room, most of them are probably not even aware that there are professional players, much less, who they are. Oh, a few of them might recognize Jeanette, but half of them probably don't know her name.

Serious players, like the kind who spend time on pool forums, are few and far between. To most of the world, pool is just a recreational game. We probably need to remind ourselves of that from time to time. Like it or not, we are not your "normal" pool players or fans.

Steve
 
This is a list of the last 10 years of top tournament players and their winnings. It does not include any expences or gambling winnings or losses.

It is of note, that only one year in the last 10 does the top player NOT make 6 figures in winnings.

Also included is the IPT years (2005 and 2006) payouts. In 2006 the top 10 players all made in the 6 figure range.

Professional pool players (at least the top 10) have enjoyed 10 years of tournament money, enough to make a decent living.

I wonder what the next ten years will bring?

2010 top 3 and money won
Player Name 2010 Prize Money
Darren Appleton $118,494
Efren Reyes $93,709
Mika Immonen $92,068

2009 top 3 and money won
Mika Immonen $238,320
Ralf Souquet $101,037
Shane Van Boening $90,975

2008 top 3 and mony won
Player Name 2008 Prize Money
Ralf Souquet $171,852
Mika Immonen $149,582
Shane Van Boening $147,420

2007 top 3 and money won
Daryl Peach $123,000
Shane Van Boening $116,307
Niels Feijen $113,665

2006 top 10 and money won IPT YEAR
Efren Reyes $644,960
Thorsten Hohmann $394,025
Ralf Souquet $219,350
Rodney Morris $214,950
Dennis Orcollo $202,500
Ronnie Alcano $161,754
Mika Immonen $158,450
Johnny Archer $137,580
Marlon Manalo $112,271
Francisco Bustamante $108,495
Corey Deuel $101,250

2005 top 10 and money won IPT YEAR
Player Name 2005 Prize Money
Efren Reyes $279,169
Mike Sigel $250,000
Marlon Manalo $199,500
Francisco Bustamante $140,272
Chia-Ching Wu $109,500
Johnny Archer $100,104
Thorsten Hohmann $96,635
Santos Sambajon $89,669
Corey Deuel $87,482
Mika Immonen $83,642

2004 top 3 and money won
Efren Reyes $124,150
Alex Pagulayan $118,183
Rodney Morris $88,537

2003 top 3 and money won
Player Name 2003 Prize Money
Johnny Archer $131,460
Francisco Bustamante $118,975
Efren Reyes $106,050
Alex Pagulayan $94,513

2002 top 3 and money won
Player Name 2002 Prize Money
Efren Reyes $126,200
Francisco Bustamante $122,800
Earl Strickland $110,200

2001 top 3 and money won
Efren Reyes $215,362
Corey Deuel $102,163
Mika Immonen $99,919

2000 top 3 and money won
Player Name 2000 Prize Money
Earl Strickland $91,105
Efren Reyes $79,930
Fong-Pang Chao $70,800

Thanks for the post, interesting info

This wouldn't include things like Mosconi cup appearance money, exhibitions, sponsorship etc etc
 
From the looks of it without going into great detail a promoter can set up shop with a camera and pool table and handle sales while some well-trained talent gets muled, traveled around, for new productions in new areas. Alternatively is the pool tournament which has its own history of problems, I wish there were more records or articles of what happen in the past. Either case the people with the talent are letting people with cameras of advertising budgets scheme off of their talents, like most other production industries. I won't speculate too much about pool rooms but on average.

The point I am raising is talent versus marketing argument. Having talent draws a crowd but selling a product has greater potential for stealing money.

You are right. All of the people who work to create events and generate added money or opportunities for a free roll should just stop exploiting the talent. The players would be much better off without events like the US Open 9 ball, The Seminole Tour, the Turning Stone events, TAR matches, Accu-Stats produced events, the US Open 10 Ball and US Bar Table Championships and Derby City Classic.

Then the players would be free to make the most money from their talent unencumbered by promoters or people out to promote them and their talent to the world.

What could go wrong ?
 
Thanks for the post, interesting info

This wouldn't include things like Mosconi cup appearance money, exhibitions, sponsorship etc etc

Yeah, it would include M-Cup $ but it would not account for the countless high-dollar exhibitions and the hefty sponsorship monies........:confused:
 
From the looks of it without going into great detail a promoter can set up shop with a camera and pool table and handle sales while some well-trained talent gets muled, traveled around, for new productions in new areas. Alternatively is the pool tournament which has its own history of problems, I wish there were more records or articles of what happen in the past. Either case the people with the talent are letting people with cameras of advertising budgets scheme off of their talents, like most other production industries. I won't speculate too much about pool rooms but on average.

The point I am raising is talent versus marketing argument. Having talent draws a crowd but selling a product has greater potential for stealing money.

Did you bump your head? Don't know where you're from but they got GOOOOOOD weed!
 
Last edited:
If this board gets any more cluttered I'd think I am in a major network sports VIP fan area.

So some promoter decided to pay 10K, 15K for a top talent to provide film footage for a straight to consumer sell. In the big times like NFL, NBA, NHL, Baseball there is a recruiting session, its not just a quick call saying hey I want you to do something for me, its more of a marriage, training facilities are provided, support staff are there to handle basic public relations they do travel on a bus together but they are on the road a lot more. All the expenses for a major network sports event is put into creating the atmosphere. Having the players prepped, having the tech equipment reliable and ensuring their are no production glitches. All production equipment is first class. A camera mount for a major network event is more expensive then the beds the top pros sleep on when on the road in the bus. The amount of cabling at a stadium for a major event is enough to outweigh the bus full of players and that is because everything is triplicated and then kept triplicate in stockpile. The idea that the production is first and the expenses are based heavily on making sure the production equipment is at the same level of competition as the players it films.

In the case of the new pool era production equipment is more of a patch up job. Where is the expense budget? It can't be found in equipment, doubtful its in advertising? its got me stumped.



What is wrong with the quality of life is that the business end at least the new business end doesn't have money. At least the kind of money to interest the best players, or to display top quality production equipment. It may interest less then the best or new players.

So the next best play is to hype up a new talent. But pool isn't like a full-contact sport. As the players age they just get better. The matches I've seen once an old pro knows he has beat a young buck he just strings him along.

Maybe for the older pros the part of the game that is new is seeing the new guys deal with old problems. For a retirement package getting a second chance at doing it over again seems worth it. Maybe they stick around maybe they don't. Either way somebody has to sell something to fans, usually something new and "different."

Also in major sports broadcasting the sell is for attendance or broadcasting rights, not DVD sales. The older pros have experience with it. But you know how new tech is everyone thinks they have a leg up on the competition.

The quality of life for players is declining because any consumer can go to a tech shop and pick up production equipment because of the falling costs of it. This means less top tier business people producing events and more bottom tier operators trying to piece together a production.

I do not underestimate camera work, it is a union job just like lighting. But seeing a low quality production in action turns heads. There is a difference between a hobby project and a professional business. But you know the story about knockoff street, it has the look and feel once its sold that is all that matters.
 
Last edited:
I heard that Shane and Archer went in 50/50 on a Lear Jet today. Could be a internet rumor, might be true. Anyone else heard anything on this?
 
I heard that Shane and Archer went in 50/50 on a Lear Jet today. Could be a internet rumor, might be true. Anyone else heard anything on this?

Shane had to trade in his old jet.


jet.jpg
 
Back
Top