miplayerstour said:I was really put off by the rape comment............unreal!
ShawnD said:RACE2-9
Yes, there was some side action with Scott but he quit when Ronnie got down ten games. He gave the money to Ronnie. There were 6 witnesses. Ronnie then said he would stand good for the bet. We continued to play until he was 17 game loser. I told ronnie to square the penny off or i dont want to continue. He replied that no way would he lower the bet and that i would be in the wrong if i quit him while he was down. I was betting $500 a game with $200 a game on the penny. I got aired the 17 games on the penny and $500 for the last game.
wayne said:Does this make sense to anyone? Scott was 10 games down at $200 a game on the side bet. He decides to pull up and gives the $2000 to Ronnie (????) instead of paying off Shawn.
If Scott paid off the $2000 he owed why would he give it to the player he didn't owe it to. I am sure the 6 witnesses would be pretty confused with this payoff also.
Am I missing something in this scenario?
Wayne
Smorgass Bored said:Well, I'll take a crack at it.
If Ronnie is down 10 games at $500 each (his bet) and he's been paying off, he's stuck $5,000.
If Scott is down 10 games at $200 each and pulls up and gives Ronnie the $2,000, then Ronnie is still stuck $5,000... but now he has $2,000 more money in his pocket. That's four more games that he can pay off on his $500 bets. They let the coin continue to move at $200 per game, so Ronnie is taking at whack at getting even at $700 per game (although noone is standing good for the $200 per penny moved each game on Ronnie's side of the bet)
When the game ends, there's no money to pay off the $200 side bets, because Ronnie was using the money that Scott gave him to keep playing the $500 per game bet between ShawnD. vs Ronnie.
ShawnD. got air barreled for the finall $500 bet with Ronnie and ALL 17 side bet games being scored by moving the penny for an addional $3,400.......or $3,900 TOTAL
Doug
(how'd I do ?)
Roy Steffensen said:I think you explained it perfect - and if it's like that, Ronnie owe 3900
Theft has no agreement either. Just because they are gambling, does not make it ok for one of them to steal. It's like the girl that agreed to go on a date with the guy where the assault occured. Having an agreement to do one thing, doesn't make something else ok.miplayerstour said:<snips>In gambling the game is agreed upon by both parties. You either play or you dont based on the terms set up. Rape has no agreement nor does burglary and isnt even close to the same thing and is insulting to even insinuate that its the same.
The only way for the girl to get raped is to not carry a gun. The only way to get burglarized is to not have armed guards at your house 24/7. Do you realize how ludicrous your victim blaming sounds? Protecting yourself is smart, but it doesn't make you at fault for their actions if you didn't protect yourself enough to prevent it.miplayerstour said:The only way to get stiffed is to get into a bet without posting and thats bad gambling period!!
The agreement was not that he pay up when he can, it was that he pay up at the end of play. You happen to be selling anything? If you are go ahead and ship it to me and the money is on the way. When you end up wondering why the money never came and are still waiting around for it I'm sure you will be just fine with that, as long as you think I might pay you some day, right?miplayerstour said:If ronnie owes Im sure he'll pay up because from what I know, he always has.
What you are saying is just as rediculous as saying the girl had a choice to carry a gun but chose not to. Sure, it's smart to take precautions to protect yourself, but real blame always lies with the perpetrator, not the victim.miplayerstour said:Let the boys work it out but lets not get ridiculous and start comparing rape victims to people that had a choice to post and chose not to! Thats on them!
And I was really put off by the putting all the blame on the victim comments............unreal!miplayerstour said:I was really put off by the rape comment............unreal!
And Scott said he was done, gave Ronnie the money. Ronnie thought it was more stake for him, so he kept playing. Sounds like a big mis-communication error on a few peoples part. This would be an interesting one to try and resolve!Smorgass Bored said:Well, I'll take a crack at it.
If Ronnie is down 10 games at $500 each (his bet) and he's been paying off, he's stuck $5,000.
If Scott is down 10 games at $200 each and pulls up and gives Ronnie the $2,000, then Ronnie is still stuck $5,000... but now he has $2,000 more money in his pocket. That's four more games that he can pay off on his $500 bets. They let the coin continue to move at $200 per game, so Ronnie is taking at whack at getting even at $700 per game (although noone is standing good for the $200 per penny moved each game on Ronnie's side of the bet)
When the game ends, there's no money to pay off the $200 side bets, because Ronnie was using the money that Scott gave him to keep playing the $500 per game bet between ShawnD. vs Ronnie.
ShawnD. got air barreled for the finall $500 bet with Ronnie and ALL 17 side bet games being scored by moving the penny for an addional $3,400.......or $3,900 TOTAL
Doug
(how'd I do ?)
Neil said:And Scott said he was done, gave Ronnie the money. Ronnie thought it was more stake for him, so he kept playing. Sounds like a big mis-communication error on a few peoples part. This would be an interesting one to try and resolve!
Lol! on the next jet.Rubyron said:A few more.![]()
If you're too good a shooter, I'll leave on a scooter.
If I "air" you don't fuss or I'll leave on a bus.
If you win the bet, I'll be on the next jet.
If I'm down when we're through, will you take I.O.U.?