Ronnie Wiseman stiff's me for $3900

seems a little odd

I can see what happened but it does seem that Scott played the deal both ways. When he handed the $2000 to Ronnie instead of Shawn it seems that he hoped to see some of it back if Ronnie closed the gap or won overall. If he still had his money in play but with no more risk that was pretty fancy footwork!

Hu
 
guts

BVal said:
I don't know Ronnie but I do know Scott. I don't trust him one bit!

BVal
Took guts to say that , being where you live and play pool out of. Don't know you personnaly, but I like ya! I'll make a point of saying hi at the next tournament.
 
jay helfert said:
These things happen Shawn and I'm sure you are aware of it too. For a bet that size, my preference would be to post one game and then pay after each game. Anything over 100 a game, I'll make my man post. Although I have been stiffed for as little as $100 at 20 a game. Even for a social bet like $20, I like to pay every two games to avoid any problems.

This is a complete hijack of the thread but I'll post it anyway. I was in a place one time and this gal was bugging me to gamble cheap. I wanted no part of it but I finally agreed to play her a race to 5, loser had to put a dollar in the juke box and play the winner's choice of a song figuring that would be harmless enough. I run over her and tell her to play me a Patsy Cline song. She says "I ain't playing that crap" and puts a dollar in the juke box but instead of Patsy Cline she plays some song that sounded like some guy screaming into the microphone accompanied by some people whose instruments were out of tune. The she proceeds to tell the entire room I'm a hustler. Now I can't get a game if I agree to play standing on my head.

Aside from that, I hope the guy gets his money. Where's Luca Brasi when you need him?
 
watchez said:
JAM said that there are 3 sides to this story. Sounds like there are at least 4 - the room owner, Ronnie, Scott and the truth.

To me, it is too confusing.

The room owner states that Ronnie owes the entire $3900 but there was cash pay off after each game along with a penny moved. Why would you have two separate best with the same person? This part of the room owner's story makes absolutely no sense. Remember the title of this thread is Ronnie Wiseman stiffed me

But using your ATM card as a debit, if you have the money in there - you can charge whatever you like. Obviously, if the room owner is telling the truth and the debit card was tried to be used the room owner was willing to pay the fees that he would be incur by the charge company and run it thru the pool room's credit card machine. Which was it - credit card machine or ATM?


Not sure you are correct on this. My Debit Card has always limited total daily withdrawals-money in there or not.
 
I think what he means is that a debit card run not at an atm, but as a business purchase, does not have the same limitations.
 
To clear up a few things...

1st- Smorgass bored has it figured out to the T.
2nd He tried to run his debit card on my credit card machine. We agreed that it would be for a pool table purchase if anything came up about it. And if you have enough money then you can run a debit card for whatever.
3rd- If him and Scott had a different deal then i dont know. I dont want to hurt anyones imagine that is innocent. I only know what was said in front of me with both of them side by side. And that was i will stand good for the debt as soon as the bank opens. That came out of Ronnies mouth.
4th- I already stated that i let the coin keep moving only because Ronnie said i would be dead wrong if i didnt let him continue to run the coin and pay off the following day. I knew he only had about 2 dimes in cash left. I didnt think there would be a problem with getting paid or I would have just quit.
5th- After he tried to let me run the card and it was declined, he asked if he could just wire transfer the money and ask for my personal info.
6th- The second day after playing in the pool room in front of everyone including scott he said he would make everything right the next morning. After almost a week and now that scott is also gone he is trying to pull the move. Thats all it is.

I dont mind anyone posting on his behalf but he will deny it to the end now.

About the robbery at the pool room. Yes, bad as i hate to say it, it's true. A guy came in at closing and robbed the bartender for the money in the register. He didnt hurt anyone until the off duty security officer tried taking the gun from him while trying to leave and the gun accidently went off shooting him in the leg. The place has been open for ten years and has never had anything like this happen. All the other road players were there for another week enjoying the place. Ronnie is just doing what he can to try and hurt my image. It is the truth about the robbery but it does not hurt my image. It happens everyday in different towns. I am not proud of it but it is the truth and cannot do anything about it. There have been thousands of road players come in my place and win tons of cash mainly from lil john and have never had a problem with robbery.
 
alstl said:
Aside from that, I hope the guy gets his money. Where's Luca Brasi when you need him?

Luca sleeps with the fishes.

Fishes? Exactly how many is that? :confused:

Jim
 
Smorgass Bored said:
Well, I'll take a crack at it.
If Ronnie is down 10 games at $500 each (his bet) and he's been paying off, he's stuck $5,000.
If Scott is down 10 games at $200 each and pulls up and gives Ronnie the $2,000, then Ronnie is still stuck $5,000... but now he has $2,000 more money in his pocket. That's four more games that he can pay off on his $500 bets. They let the coin continue to move at $200 per game, so Ronnie is taking at whack at getting even at $700 per game (although noone is standing good for the $200 per penny moved each game on Ronnie's side of the bet)

When the game ends, there's no money to pay off the $200 side bets, because Ronnie was using the money that Scott gave him to keep playing the $500 per game bet between ShawnD. vs Ronnie.

ShawnD. got air barreled for the finall $500 bet with Ronnie and ALL 17 side bet games being scored by moving the penny for an addional $3,400.......or $3,900 TOTAL

Doug
(how'd I do ?)


Where in the hell were you when we were trying to fill GREENSPAN'S shoes??
 
glass half full

Actually Shawn can look at it several ways,but if he looks at it as playing a top player with the nuts ,and giving back a 36% bite,(or walking stick)it's not all that bad. Come on Shawn,17 games WOW.

Why don't you call the debt even if he comes back down to play the same game for $5,000 ?? Of coarse you put up. :thumbup: :thumbup:
 
He beat me 9 ahead at $500 a game already. And when we started this session he had me stuck 5 or 6 games. So in reallity i was stuck 16 games at one point. I didnt ask for adjustment or bite him for a game. Now i am 8 game winner after 35 hours of playing. I would say it is a even game. All Ronnie has to do is play good. When i lost the 9 ahead i paid every penny and did not ask for a walking stick. Cant say i have ever in any match. I dont bet what i cant lose.
 
He Deserves More Than A Walking Stick... imo

While Ronnie's attempts to pay are shaky at best, the poor guy shot during the robbery doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Doug
(that's who I feel badly for)
 
JAM said:
If I give red rep or green rep, it really is none of your business how I use the so-called system. And I sure as hell don't owe you an explanation for why I give rep, good or bad.

Maybe you should be more concerned about posters who have been BANNED from this forum five times, only time come back under a new identity. I think it is far more offensive to read the words of a banned man posting as a troll than the usage of this forum's rep system.

Thank you for your opinion. :)

JAM

Are you insinuating that I have been banned before under a different username? If that's the case, you are more delusional than I originally thought.
 
ShawnD said:
To clear up a few things...



.

They got away in yore town but if they try that s**t in Branden or Jackson we will make them regret for their stupidity.:cool:
 
Last edited:
If it were me, I'd settle the debt for 1K or so and never play him again. Lesson learned.
 
Poolplaya9 said:
And I was really put off by the putting all the blame on the victim comments............unreal!

Let me guess, your used to gambling for a hot dog and a soda, right?

Your gambling IQ = ZERO.
 
Why its ok to play a known stiffer:

iusedtoberich said:
You guys thinking this has ruined his action are way off. Next time he tries to match up, he will still get a game, EVEN if people are aware he stiffed someone. As an example, I play guys that owe money to others all the time. As long as they post up with me, I could care less that they owe money to others. In fact, I could care less if the person they owed money to came in while I was playing the "stiffer".

When you are matching up with someone NOTHING about their past payment matters. The only thing that matters is what is in their pocket and on the light at that moment in time.



instroke75 said:
this attitude is exactly the problem with pool! if people really black balled people for stuff like this, they would stop doing it! but morons like u keep giving them action regardless!
Jeremy


My reply based on personal experience: Why its ok to play a known stiffer:

Do you gamble? I ask because your statement seems to come from a belief that we live in a perfect fantasy world.

I think its a fair assumption that way more than half of the gamblers in the world, at pool, cards, sports, golf, ANYTHING, have welched on a bet at least once in their life. I bet the percentage is 90%. Remember ,I said at least once in their life. So if the "saint gambler" black balled every person that welched on a bet, there would be NO action ANYWHERE in the world! You would only have the people living in a fantasy world betting hot dogs and sodas on a game of pool.

I'm not a card player but I always hear people say to maximize their wins and minimize their losses when playing hands. I'll try to relate that to pool gambling. The most you can win is what a guy has in his pocket WHILE you are playing him. Don't ever count on him paying the next day. Now, if a guy owes you but has some cash, he will rather play someone else than pay you off. That is just life. So rather than make a stink about getting the past money he owes you, you can go after his NEW money.


Let me give you an example. I have a customer I bust every time we play. (Total sucker). We always pay after every game. The last game is of course always an air shot by him, and is usually settled up at the beginning of the next time we play. We've been doing this for 2 years. Now the guy's financial situation has recently changed, and his income potential is much less than before. So he asks to play without settling up the last game from the prior session, and instead settle up that game at the end of the current session. I say sure, and I beat him for all the money in his pocket, 600, plus a new air barrel. So now he owes me two barrels, one from the first session, and one from the second. Now we are playing pretty high, and the 2 air barrels amount to $500 total.

So the next week he is still broke and plays a loser at teh poolroom who has no gambling expereice completely on the wire. It starts a small game of $30, and quickly gets out of hand and the bet is $60 and another 30 on the side. At the end he owes something like $400. I'm laughing on the inside cause I know he is broke and can't pay, while the guy he is playing has no clue he is broke. So that is that, they get stiffed, cause the guy is broke, and they were too naive to pay each game.

Now a week later he calls me up and asks to play. I say sure, and that he doesn't have to pay me the $500 he owes me, unless he beats me real bad. I also say lets go to a different pool room so the guys he owes money to won't bother us. So we play, and I win $800 from him betting $200 a game. He is bust and asks me to go on the wire. I say ok. Now I KNOW I won't get this extra cash, but I go on the wire to make the game CLOSER. I won 4 games in about 5 hours to bust him before we went on the wire. Then we went on the wire and I made it go back and forth for 5 MORE hours. So while the end result was the same money, I won 4 total games in 10 hours instead of 5, which makes the game seem much fairer to him when we negotiate the next time he has cash. Now keep in mind this is a game I am completely controlling.

So why say all this. By letting the guy get away with the air barrels he owes TO ME, and by not caring about the OTHER PEOPLE he stiffed, I got an extra 1400 from him (600 first time and 800 second time in above two sessions.) So to use the poker analogy above, I maximized my win by not caring about the money he owed me.

The guy he stiffed and the side better (400 total) won't play him unless he pays them first. So from HIS point of view, why would he pay them and be broke again when he can start on clean slate with me?

And from MY point of view, I only care about what he has in his pocket NOW, and I will get it any way possible. Its my right! If I cry for him to settle up, I'll never get it. But if I play him for it, it will all be mine. Now remember, this case is a situation I have complete control over. I can't let a few air barrels cost me the chance to win thousands more. That would be foolish.

Now some of you will say I'm crazy. But I think many of the experiecend lifelong gamblers who made the most money gambling during their pool careers will totally agree with me.

I'd also say that it sucks teh OP got stiffed. But he did win the MOST he could that night (he busted 2 people). He might still be down lifetime to Ronnie, but he did the best he could that night, which was get ALL the money.
 
tanco said:
Are you insinuating that I have been banned before under a different username? If that's the case, you are more delusional than I originally thought.
No, the second post/reply that JAM always makes towards corvette1340 whenever they have a 'discussion' is that he is a 5 time banned member.

I think she has made her point but she likes to make it over and over again.
 
Hal said:
If it were me, I'd settle the debt for 1K or so and never play him again. Lesson learned.


LOL, I'd want a dime in addition to the principal for my aggravation. YEP, that would "sparkle" me:yeah:
 
Back
Top