So you think DP hosting a tourney that would otherwise not exist, with $75,000 in prize money is a bad thing. Or do you just disagree with the way CW runs/promotes his event.
Check your sig line again......If its good for the players ect....
That's the question isn't it? Is it "good" for the players? Or is it just good for "some" players and not others.
Did I EVER ONCE say that I thought Charlie putting up a 75K tournament is a bad thing?
No, if you bother to read what I wrote then I said he is to be commended for creating a 20K payday for women players.
That doesn't mean I AGREE with the way the tournament is being run. Just in the same way that I have DISAGREED with how other tournaments have been run in the past.
Basically the attitude put forth by many here is that the participants of this and other events should either suck it up or choose not to play. That's all well and good and each person does have a choice to protest by non-participation.
However that is each individual's personal choice. And in the future some of them may decide to make that choice.
I, as a fan, can certainly voice my opinion here if I don't feel things are right. I happen to agree with Sarah's sentiments.
And I certainly believe that Edwin Reyes would have been against the favoritism and the fact that unqualified participants were "invited" over those who otherwise had to earn a spot. That, in fact, was one of the cornerstones of his platform against the Makebenta regime.
It's not good for the players when they play on subpar, to quote Jay Helfert "B-", equipment in a environmentally hostile arena. It's not good for the player's self-esteem when the best players are ignored in favor of staging what feels like a beauty pageant.
And seriously, five tables for eight groups? One practice table? That's an amazing lack of respect for the players you have in a WORLD Championship. But then again, all you have to do to get a WC is spend a little money with the WPA and bingo you can do what you want to.
Let's see, one player will get $20,000. The second place finisher will get $9000 and it's downhill from there. The hotel is a couple hundred a night, the flight was $1500 or so, days off work for a lot of the players amounts to more expense, do you honestly think that most of the participants will cover their expenses? How is a tournament with bad conditions, sexist attitudes, which puts horrible pool on TV in front of millions of casual viewers good for the players?
So, no, I don't think that a tournament where there is no entry fee except that you check your dignity at the door is a good thing for the players, at least not for the players who can actually play.