Say it ain't so Michela Fired!?!?!

In U.S. law, sexual harassment is a sub-group under the category of sex discrimination. So, in the U.S., if someone is suing for sex discrimination, it may or may not include sexual harassment. Those details would be provided in the law suit.
 
Last edited:
It's fine when they are promoted for their appearance. Then they get a little older and now it's time to say how badly they were treated. You aren't entitled to a job. If it's intolerable you leave. She wasn't some immigrant single mother on a visa without options. Playing the victim for a few bucks, nonsense.
 
Wow. I guess you have no idea what real sexual discrimination looks like. (Not saying that happened in this case.) keeping your job shouldn't be dependent on sexual favors. In fact, that's the same as rape.

Not in my world. In one scenario you have choices in the other you don't.

See -- it's not the same.

My daughters definitely won't view them as the same thing either.
 
I am bothered by the presumption of many that Michaela's career was built entirely on the foundation of her sexuality. While there can be no denying that being an attractive woman has contributed to her popularity with her fans, the fact is that she's an outstanding referee and one of the most effective when it comes to restoring order when competitors get out of line. It is further likely that her attractiveness helped make her more popular among her colleagues and bosses, and, fair or unfair, that's the norm in most working environments.

Nonetheless, the law protects employees from bias based on gender, race, accent, etc. While none of us know the facts, let's hope that if Michaela has been denied the kind of working environment that employees are guaranteed by law, she will be properly compensated.
 
Say it aint so Michela Fired

HI I thought she quit on her own was a very good Referee

i hope that everything clears up she put Earle Strikland in his place
and told him to keep quite and Earle later on gave her some flowers
 
It's fine when they are promoted for their appearance. Then they get a little older and now it's time to say how badly they were treated. You aren't entitled to a job. If it's intolerable you leave. She wasn't some immigrant single mother on a visa without options. Playing the victim for a few bucks, nonsense.

Don't get me wrong , I've had issues with the overboard feminists for years but
it would premature to lump every situation into one category.
Shes been doing this job for years, if something has transpired it would be
ridiculous to say '' just find another job''. I'm not saying treat everyone equally
because I feel that isn't humanly possible but treating people respectfully is,
man or woman!
All races and genders are flawed, and if a mans actions of disrespect is purely
shrugged off because '' hey he's a guy what do you expect'' attitude , its
an injustice to men in general as well as the victim, in this case a woman.
 
Not in my world. In one scenario you have choices in the other you don't.

See -- it's not the same.

My daughters definitely won't view them as the same thing either.
But its not far off. If a woman is given an ultimatum , for instance'' If you
want to pay your bills and keep a roof over your kids heads, you must let
me violate you first'' might not be rape but a little rapey, creepy and a sprinkle
off douchebag written all over it.
Your right though, in one of those scenarios there's a choice but it shouldn't
be that victim or potential victim to be subjected to loss, it should be the
perpetrator.
 
But its not far off. If a woman is given an ultimatum , for instance'' If you
want to pay your bills and keep a roof over your kids heads, you must let
me violate you first'' might not be rape but a little rapey, creepy and a sprinkle
off douchebag written all over it.
Your right though, in one of those scenarios there's a choice but it shouldn't
be that victim or potential victim to be subjected to loss, it should be the
perpetrator.

Yeah -- I still think it's pretty far off.

While I agree that any guy that would act like this is a dirt bag loser, it's still not the same as rape. Actually, if the woman went through with it, it would be much closer to prostitution. Prostitutes have to keep a roof over their heads too you know.

Now back to pool...
 
Yeah -- I still think it's pretty far off.

While I agree that any guy that would act like this is a dirt bag loser, it's still not the same as rape. Actually, if the woman went through with it, it would be much closer to prostitution. Prostitutes have to keep a roof over their heads too you know.

Now back to pool...

Lol! U get a greeny ( first one ever ) if I can figure out how lol😮
 
Get a life dude, or at least get out of the house more bro. I didnt even read the article but I am certain it is nothing like rape - COME ON! So let's be honest, not that I would ever say this about myself and post it on a forum but for real a hot chick will always get hired or promoted over some pig. Its just the way it is and we see it all day, every day. And if someone called her sugar whatever why can't it just be taken as a compliment, which I'm sure it was. Everyone is too sensitive nowadays. And to play the devils advocate, how many women use their " assets" every single day at work to get ahead? My experience 98%.[/QUOTE

3 (+- 3) out of a hun doesn't = 98%
 
I am bothered by the presumption of many that Michaela's career was built entirely on the foundation of her sexuality. While there can be no denying that being an attractive woman has contributed to her popularity with her fans, the fact is that she's an outstanding referee and one of the most effective when it comes to restoring order when competitors get out of line. It is further likely that her attractiveness helped make her more popular among her colleagues and bosses, and, fair or unfair, that's the norm in most working environments.

Nonetheless, the law protects employees from bias based on gender, race, accent, etc. While none of us know the facts, let's hope that if Michaela has been denied the kind of working environment that employees are guaranteed by law, she will be properly compensated.
Various laws are ridiculous, take monopoly laws as an example. Charge more it's gauging, charge the same, it's fixing, charge less it's predatory pricing.

If nothing happened that didn't require her contacting police immediately, then I doubt any scenario would convince me she has a right of retribution. Her right imho, is to report a crime or walk away.

If anyone has a case under the ridiculous PC laws it's the officials who's jobs she prematurely took... and I'd mock those guys if they tried such a thing.

Colin
 
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/mar/19/michaela-tab-snooker-referee-leaves

http://www.cueclubinternational.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=1322

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/scots-snooker-ref-michaela-tabb-1119152
In her early professional life, Michaela was a sales rep for Ann Summers, the lingerie and sex toys store chain.

“The sexism that I have got is friendly banter. That’s all I’ve ever had from people I work with."

“If any woman comes into a male-orientated environment and can’t handle it, they’re in the wrong job. But there’s still got to be a level of respect.”

http://www.michaelatabb.com/
Nothing there but promises
New website coming soon..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michaela_Tabb

She started refereeing in the mid 1990s - POOL
Became a professional POOL referee in 1997
Recruited by World Snooker in 2001
She was terminated in 2003, then reinstated

http://www.prosnookerblog.com/referees/former-refs/michaela-tabb/

Posters on her side
https://www.facebook.com/SnookerLegends
 
Last edited:
Odd thread

I assumed that this story was of general interest since Michela is a cue sports celebrity. But I forgot when I posted it that the internet has a way of turning any story into a cable news sound bite.

For those of you who feel that Michela's lawsuit is a personal attack on their way of life and their social structures. I think you should keep in mind people you don't know don't generally call lawyers because they want to change your life. Usually its because they feel they were wronged enough to need help and redress for the misbehavior of others in their lives.

Lets wish her well and hope the cue sports world can find a new place for her. I for one would miss her if she were gone for good. She's a great ref and a likeable celebrity...
 
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/mar/19/michaela-tab-snooker-referee-leaves

http://www.cueclubinternational.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleID=1322

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/scots-snooker-ref-michaela-tabb-1119152
In her early professional life, Michaela was a sales rep for Ann Summers, the lingerie and sex toys store chain.

“The sexism that I have got is friendly banter. That’s all I’ve ever had from people I work with."

“If any woman comes into a male-orientated environment and can’t handle it, they’re in the wrong job. But there’s still got to be a level of respect.”

http://www.michaelatabb.com/
Nothing there but promises
New website coming soon..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michaela_Tabb

She started refereeing in the mid 1990s - POOL
Became a professional POOL referee in 1997
Recruited by World Snooker in 2001
She was terminated in 2003, then reinstated

http://www.prosnookerblog.com/referees/former-refs/michaela-tabb/

Posters on her side
https://www.facebook.com/SnookerLegends
Good stuff Scara!

An aspect few tend to process, is that this legal action by Michaela discourages employers from hiring women. Karmic irony at work.

Great work feminazis, you've almost priced yourselves out of the marriage market, you can achieve the same in the work market with all your progressivism.

My tongue is slightly toward my cheek, but these are serious issues to consider, and PC attitudes are as useful as chocolate teacups.

Women, know your limits! :p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w
 
My opinion is she may be hoping to an undisclosed monetary settlement of out court. You can sue for anything, but it doesn't mean you can win. Some peope who are sued will settle just get rid of the anxiety of going through legal proceedings, especially if they're covered in the press. Pay 'em to go away.
 
Fast tracked because of her looks? One only has to look at the competent way that she refereed all billiard and pool games she was involved with to answer that one with a resounding no; her ability to control crowd and players while gaining/maintaining respect speaks for itself.

If I was a dafabetting man I would be inclined to look at the timing of her refereeing of the Bonus Ball games and the subsequent withholding of the “discretionary bonus” as possible catalysts for these subsequent events. Comments once viewed as cheeky, collegial and harmless may become harassment when viewed in the rear view mirror of being constructively dismissed through the vindictive actions of an employer with whom you no longer see eye to eye.

She always handled herself in a very professional way; I wish her well in this action and in her future endeavours.
 
Nope...because that would be assault & battery, for which she would be liable for criminal prosecution. She is going about it in the correct, legal manner...and if her charges are proven true, she deserves proper compensation. How much? If the charges are true, then she should sue their ass off.

Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com

I think what 2strong4u is suggesting (possibly) is that instead of lawyering up and sueing when somebody (a boss) makes an unwanted advance, maybe she should just kick him in the balls instead, warn him of a lawsuit if it happens again, and move on with her day.
 
Fast tracked because of her looks? One only has to look at the competent way that she refereed all billiard and pool games she was involved with to answer that one with a resounding no; her ability to control crowd and players while gaining/maintaining respect speaks for itself.

She was clearly fast tracked due to her looks, and that troubles me naught, it just adds to the irony and hypocrisy. Yeah, she did a decent job too, her being popular did not work in a player's favor when they acted up in her presence.

That does not give her the right to execute coercive means to extract money from an employer she wasn't entirely satisfied with.

Colin
 
Back
Top