ShootingArts said:
I doubt very seriously if a foul would have been called without replay
Hu
According to referee Nigel Rees, he would have called a foul if there was no replay to consult:
""My gut reaction was thinking that it was a foul but we had the benefit of a (television) replay. We went to the replay for quite a while...but they are the rules and you have to make the right call. Whoever made that shot, that's the call I would've made."
As to the legality of consulting the video replay, here is what Thomas Overbeck, the WPA Sports Director and senior rules official at the 2007 Philippines World Pool Championship, said:
"The ruling is that the ref must make a decision before the next shot is made. An opponent can always ask for a referee for a reconsideration if it was a foul...Nigel straight away said 'I have to check it out' and the correct procedure was followed.
"It wasn't like the game was over for five minutes, he immediately said 'I have to investigate'.
"The rules say a referee of a pool match can make a decision by any means possible. If there is television replays then we can use it.
"Nigel told me that his initial feeling was that it was a foul. He is a very respected referee.
"Bustamante did not address the situation with me. I think he knows he hit the 9-ball first. He asked me if Nigel reacted accordingly to the rules and I said 'yes he did'."