tight pockets bad for pool?

Im a firm believer that playing on tables with tighter pockets make for a more accurate player, my pockets on my 9ft Jefferson are just under 4-1/2 inches, now granted ive yet to master tight pockets, I can clearly see my accuracy has improved, and bucket pockets at local parlors is a dream, only problem is if your vs'ing a player who frequently shoots on tight pockets as well, then them buckets are just as easy for them as it is for you..;)
 
It is interesting to read how some people like it and others don't but I think the original question and topic is "are tight pockets bad for pool?" I think JL is asking in the BROADEST SENSE. I don't think he is talking about any one particular group only (pros, advanced players, league players, beginners).

What is the impact of tight pockets on pool as a whole? Is it helping us? Is pool more popular as a result?
 
Tight pocket sermon

This thread has enlightened me in so-o-o-o many ways. Thankyou Paul for bringing it back to the original question. The original question posed by jalapus logan was, are tight pockets good for pool? Very few of the answering posts addressed that question. Instead there was the usual dribble of, “it’s all about me and what I like and what advantage pocket size gives me.” That is the attitude that has, IMO, hurt this sport and why professional tours have a difficult time being successful outside of the pool room. (Another post, another time.)

First of all, I hope that everyone can agree to a few statements.
1) Pool would not have as many players as it does if it were not for the rooms. With no or few rooms there would be no or few players.
2) Players develop their skills in the pool rooms. Those skills are not developed by playing on a home table without the competition the room has to offer.
3) When we all started playing pool our goal was to make the ball.
4) According to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA) study in 2008, Billiards/Pool ranked 10th in the country for participation at some 17,178,000 players that averaged playing 13 days a year. For overall participation in individual sports, the top three activities encompassing the family and social aspect are bowling (58.7 million), pool (49 million) and golf (27.6 million).
A) The majority of pool players play 8-ball on a 7 foot table.
B) The majority of pool players still play “bar” rules.
5) The APA’s boast of having some 260,000 members in the largest league falls far short of players that are available for membership.
6) Better than average players know everything there is to know about running a profitable pool room. (Extreme Sarcasm)

I will emphatically state that tight pockets are bad for pool. It’s a very simple concept. The tighter the pockets, the less entry level players there are. If you can’t believe that, just go to the room owners forum and read the posts from owners about tight pockets and the experimenting that they have done. It is almost unanimous that they lose business everytime some owner has gotten an urge to please the “players” and make the pockets 4.5 inches or less.

If we move that equation out, without new, beginning or even the 13 time a year players (the social players), that room is going to go out of business. If enough rooms go out of business where are the players coming from to compete or become pros? Where are the players coming from to complete a $500 entry pro tournament so maybe the top 8 can make a living? Without the “bangers” pool doesn’t grow.

Everybody wants to talk about the “pros.” Whenever I give lessons to those bangers they are all hoping for a miracle so they can make balls and impress their friends. They actually want to learn enough to be able to compete on a social level. They don’t want to be world beaters. THOSE ARE THE PLAYERS THAT MAKE A ROOM SUCCESSFUL.

Here is an example. I’ve got 2 great players matching up. They play for 6 hours, have 2 beverages each, and the total bill for the night is $52. They also have some railbirds sweating the action which might bring in another $10 to $20. These railbirds would be on tables playing if they weren’t watching the action. On one of the back tables are two couples out for a social night. What does a social night consist of? First of all, these are 4 7/8” pockets so balls are being made and they are all excited when the balls go in. Because the balls are going in, they are having fun and order 3 buckets of beer, some appetizers and probably stay longer than they planned. By the time they get done, let’s say 4 hours, the total bill for the social players is over $100. It’s very simple to see which group is more profitable.
Plus on top of all that, the social players don’t complain about the equipment, tell you how to run a room, or expect “favors” from the owner like, shaping a tip, a break on pool time and too many other stupid things.

There are a ton of social players out there and rooms that have gone to tight (4.5”) pockets are feeling the loss of those players. I always have to laugh at the league players that can’t run 3 balls in a row tell me about how great it is to play on the tight diamond tables. Why are they saying that? Because they heard some better-than-average player say it. “Good players love the tight Diamond tables.” Therefore, in Joe Averages way of thinking, if he too loves the tightness, he is a good player.

I don’t care about about what the good players (pros) like. I care about getting those social players interested enough in the game and growing pool from the bottom up instead of from the top down.

One other interesting fact. In 2003 there were approximately 5000 rooms in this country. At present, there is only about 3500 rooms. Support your local rooms or they will disappear and you might have to take up bowling or golf.
 
OK, here's the thing. At the Cue Club in Vegas, ten of the GC III tables have been reworked to four inch pockets plus or minus a hair. If you hit a ball in the pocket, it goes. If you miss by an inch or two, it will depend on the speed whether it goes or not. Miss by more that that and there is no chance it will go in.

At Classic Billiards in Rochester, we have eight GC III's with nearly five inch pockets. It is possible to hit a ball directly into the pocket and it will rattle out. It is possible to miss a ball by a diamond and it will go in. On some of the tables you can not make a ball in a side pocket more than 45 degrees off axis unless slow rolled.

To me, the size of the pocket is much less important than the shape. Wrong is wrong. Period! Problem is, what is right?

Lyn

man i know exactly what you're talking about. i really hate looser pockets with hard facings. they seem to cheat you way more than tight pockets do. i think it's the harder facings or something like that.
 
It is interesting to read how some people like it and others don't but I think the original question and topic is "are tight pockets bad for pool?" I think JL is asking in the BROADEST SENSE. I don't think he is talking about any one particular group only (pros, advanced players, league players, beginners).

What is the impact of tight pockets on pool as a whole? Is it helping us? Is pool more popular as a result?

This is exactly the discussion I had intended.
 
This thread has enlightened me in so-o-o-o many ways. Thankyou Paul for bringing it back to the original question. The original question posed by jalapus logan was, are tight pockets good for pool? Very few of the answering posts addressed that question. Instead there was the usual dribble of, “it’s all about me and what I like and what advantage pocket size gives me.” That is the attitude that has, IMO, hurt this sport and why professional tours have a difficult time being successful outside of the pool room. (Another post, another time.)

First of all, I hope that everyone can agree to a few statements.
1) Pool would not have as many players as it does if it were not for the rooms. With no or few rooms there would be no or few players.
2) Players develop their skills in the pool rooms. Those skills are not developed by playing on a home table without the competition the room has to offer.
3) When we all started playing pool our goal was to make the ball.
4) According to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA) study in 2008, Billiards/Pool ranked 10th in the country for participation at some 17,178,000 players that averaged playing 13 days a year. For overall participation in individual sports, the top three activities encompassing the family and social aspect are bowling (58.7 million), pool (49 million) and golf (27.6 million).
A) The majority of pool players play 8-ball on a 7 foot table.
B) The majority of pool players still play “bar” rules.
5) The APA’s boast of having some 260,000 members in the largest league falls far short of players that are available for membership.
6) Better than average players know everything there is to know about running a profitable pool room. (Extreme Sarcasm)

I will emphatically state that tight pockets are bad for pool. It’s a very simple concept. The tighter the pockets, the less entry level players there are. If you can’t believe that, just go to the room owners forum and read the posts from owners about tight pockets and the experimenting that they have done. It is almost unanimous that they lose business everytime some owner has gotten an urge to please the “players” and make the pockets 4.5 inches or less.

If we move that equation out, without new, beginning or even the 13 time a year players (the social players), that room is going to go out of business. If enough rooms go out of business where are the players coming from to compete or become pros? Where are the players coming from to complete a $500 entry pro tournament so maybe the top 8 can make a living? Without the “bangers” pool doesn’t grow.

Everybody wants to talk about the “pros.” Whenever I give lessons to those bangers they are all hoping for a miracle so they can make balls and impress their friends. They actually want to learn enough to be able to compete on a social level. They don’t want to be world beaters. THOSE ARE THE PLAYERS THAT MAKE A ROOM SUCCESSFUL.

Here is an example. I’ve got 2 great players matching up. They play for 6 hours, have 2 beverages each, and the total bill for the night is $52. They also have some railbirds sweating the action which might bring in another $10 to $20. These railbirds would be on tables playing if they weren’t watching the action. On one of the back tables are two couples out for a social night. What does a social night consist of? First of all, these are 4 7/8” pockets so balls are being made and they are all excited when the balls go in. Because the balls are going in, they are having fun and order 3 buckets of beer, some appetizers and probably stay longer than they planned. By the time they get done, let’s say 4 hours, the total bill for the social players is over $100. It’s very simple to see which group is more profitable.
Plus on top of all that, the social players don’t complain about the equipment, tell you how to run a room, or expect “favors” from the owner like, shaping a tip, a break on pool time and too many other stupid things.

There are a ton of social players out there and rooms that have gone to tight (4.5”) pockets are feeling the loss of those players. I always have to laugh at the league players that can’t run 3 balls in a row tell me about how great it is to play on the tight diamond tables. Why are they saying that? Because they heard some better-than-average player say it. “Good players love the tight Diamond tables.” Therefore, in Joe Averages way of thinking, if he too loves the tightness, he is a good player.

I don’t care about about what the good players (pros) like. I care about getting those social players interested enough in the game and growing pool from the bottom up instead of from the top down.

One other interesting fact. In 2003 there were approximately 5000 rooms in this country. At present, there is only about 3500 rooms. Support your local rooms or they will disappear and you might have to take up bowling or golf.

This post deserves a bump for consideration. I went to my one remaining local room yesterday at 4:30 pm to discover exactly one paying customer in the room (the room has 8 bar boxes, 6 or so 4 X 8's and about 4 9' tables). I walked right back out after two minutes. I can not imagine this room (sport?????!!!!) surviving on this level of patronage.
 
This thread has enlightened me in so-o-o-o many ways. Thankyou Paul for bringing it back to the original question. The original question posed by jalapus logan was, are tight pockets good for pool? Very few of the answering posts addressed that question. Instead there was the usual dribble of, “it’s all about me and what I like and what advantage pocket size gives me.” That is the attitude that has, IMO, hurt this sport and why professional tours have a difficult time being successful outside of the pool room. (Another post, another time.)

First of all, I hope that everyone can agree to a few statements.
1) Pool would not have as many players as it does if it were not for the rooms. With no or few rooms there would be no or few players.
2) Players develop their skills in the pool rooms. Those skills are not developed by playing on a home table without the competition the room has to offer.
3) When we all started playing pool our goal was to make the ball.
4) According to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA) study in 2008, Billiards/Pool ranked 10th in the country for participation at some 17,178,000 players that averaged playing 13 days a year. For overall participation in individual sports, the top three activities encompassing the family and social aspect are bowling (58.7 million), pool (49 million) and golf (27.6 million).
A) The majority of pool players play 8-ball on a 7 foot table.
B) The majority of pool players still play “bar” rules.
5) The APA’s boast of having some 260,000 members in the largest league falls far short of players that are available for membership.
6) Better than average players know everything there is to know about running a profitable pool room. (Extreme Sarcasm)

I will emphatically state that tight pockets are bad for pool. It’s a very simple concept. The tighter the pockets, the less entry level players there are. If you can’t believe that, just go to the room owners forum and read the posts from owners about tight pockets and the experimenting that they have done. It is almost unanimous that they lose business everytime some owner has gotten an urge to please the “players” and make the pockets 4.5 inches or less.

If we move that equation out, without new, beginning or even the 13 time a year players (the social players), that room is going to go out of business. If enough rooms go out of business where are the players coming from to compete or become pros? Where are the players coming from to complete a $500 entry pro tournament so maybe the top 8 can make a living? Without the “bangers” pool doesn’t grow.

Everybody wants to talk about the “pros.” Whenever I give lessons to those bangers they are all hoping for a miracle so they can make balls and impress their friends. They actually want to learn enough to be able to compete on a social level. They don’t want to be world beaters. THOSE ARE THE PLAYERS THAT MAKE A ROOM SUCCESSFUL.

Here is an example. I’ve got 2 great players matching up. They play for 6 hours, have 2 beverages each, and the total bill for the night is $52. They also have some railbirds sweating the action which might bring in another $10 to $20. These railbirds would be on tables playing if they weren’t watching the action. On one of the back tables are two couples out for a social night. What does a social night consist of? First of all, these are 4 7/8” pockets so balls are being made and they are all excited when the balls go in. Because the balls are going in, they are having fun and order 3 buckets of beer, some appetizers and probably stay longer than they planned. By the time they get done, let’s say 4 hours, the total bill for the social players is over $100. It’s very simple to see which group is more profitable.
Plus on top of all that, the social players don’t complain about the equipment, tell you how to run a room, or expect “favors” from the owner like, shaping a tip, a break on pool time and too many other stupid things.

There are a ton of social players out there and rooms that have gone to tight (4.5”) pockets are feeling the loss of those players. I always have to laugh at the league players that can’t run 3 balls in a row tell me about how great it is to play on the tight diamond tables. Why are they saying that? Because they heard some better-than-average player say it. “Good players love the tight Diamond tables.” Therefore, in Joe Averages way of thinking, if he too loves the tightness, he is a good player.

I don’t care about about what the good players (pros) like. I care about getting those social players interested enough in the game and growing pool from the bottom up instead of from the top down.

One other interesting fact. In 2003 there were approximately 5000 rooms in this country. At present, there is only about 3500 rooms. Support your local rooms or they will disappear and you might have to take up bowling or golf.

Rep for you! I totally feel like as far as local rooms go it's important to have tables that are a little loose. And I personally love 4-4.25 pockets, but I'm willing to sacrifice it knowing it's best for bringing in the bangers who are truly the meat of the customer base.

To me its the same argument that I bring up when people say abolish 9-ball altogether and move to 10-ball. Hell even some 10-ball tournaments are going to ball in hand after a MISS. 10-ball already is going to favor the best players. No beginner or banger is going to feel like they have a chance to compete in these games. 9-ball at least there is a sliver of hope to compete with someone within a step or two of you. 9-ball serves its purpose and 10-ball serves its own. Look at the money in Poker right now because the "bangers" feel and now know they have a chance to compete in big tournaments. The same strategies should be used for pool in my opinion. The top pro's can still play 10-ball but we need a game and tables that are more prone to giving bangers some hope so they invest in the game.
 
tight pockets BAD !

JohnnyT....I agree in total!

For the audience, tight pockets are "Borrrrring". The only benefit for under 4 1/2" is a practice table, or perhaps a 1-pocket game. TV hates them as they can't "squeeze" a race to 7 in 9-ball into an hour program (even with Texas Express format) and it isn't exciting to be a spectator and watch miss after miss or play to avoid a tough shot and play safety instead! I.M.O.


It's getting so now with some of the under 4 1/2" pockets, watching 9 or 10-ball is like watching 1-hole...everyone is afraid to shoot shots that require juice or are long off-angle. To me it's not pool anymore on those table...it's more like snooker. Johnnyt
 
Billy Incardona weighs in on pocket size

This is a thread started over on the Onepocket.org website that I thought provided an interesting perspective on pocket sizes, weight, etc.:

"I originally posted this on the Which table to play thread. This is imo the measuring stick you should use when picking a table that carries the right pocket size for your game.


Let me try to put this debate in the proper prospective. This debate is not how a top player feels playing another top player on differen't pocket sizes, nor is it how one personally feels on what pocket size he plays his best game on. This debate is CAN A PLAYER GIVE MORE OR LESS WEIGHT ON 4 INCH POCKETS OVER 4-1/2 INCH POCKETS. And also what pocket size is right for certain games.

Any time that there is a game established between two players that is a competetive game, played on 4-1/2 inch pockets, would there be a difference in the outcome of that game if it was played on a 4 inch pocket table, and who would benefit with the change of pocket size. .

I believe with my years of experience that there is a certain pocket size that puts limitations on even the best of players, and that pocket size I believe starts around 4-1/4 inch and smaller. Once a pocket size is as small as 4-1/4 the player is limited on what he can do consistently. When the pocket size lessens to 4 inch and smaller the more the player is restricted. The smaller the pocket the more difficult it is for the player.

I also believe that there is a certain pocket size that limits a weaker player, and that pocket size is around 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 inches. Understanding my beliefs there is a pocket size that will maximize the the edge that a top player has over a weaker player, and I believe it's between 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 inch pockets. A top player will maximize his ability to win playing a weaker player on the above mentioned pocket size.

A top player will reach his maximum effiency playing a weaker player on pockets that are between 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 inches. This will vary depending on the strength of the weak player.

This is why I said earlier that the perfect pocket size to play your opponent on is a size that doesn't intimidate you but will intimidate your opponent. It's up to you to determine what size pockets that would be.

I also firmly believe once a pocket is reduced in size to 4 inches and smaller it only helps the weaker player over a top player, providing the game was established on pockets that are within the 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 inches. Any time a game is competitive on 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 inch pockets and it is moved to a table with 4 inch pockets or smaller the more it favors the weaker player.

There are some people that think that they can give up more weight on 4 inch pockets and smaller than they can give up on 4-1/2 inch pockets, to me it's clearly the opposite, and as a rule of thumb my suggestion will prevail more often than not.

The above has been endorsed by many of the games most creditable players.
I would like to hear opinions on the 4 inch and smaller pocket size debate.

Thanks,
Billy Incardona

http://www.onepocket.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4933
 
I was just reading the john Schmidt v JJ thread and it struck me as kind of funny that one of the reasons that was cited that the game didn't go off was that the diamond pro table was too easy for one pocket. I think that it is a demanding but fair table.

But it did get me wondering if "easy" conditions ruined matching up when the gold crowns of yesterday were the standard playing surface. What do you guys think? Were players really matching up less frequently when "easier" pockets were the norm?
 
i prefer pockets 4.5 to 5 inches for one pocket
smaller pockets intimidate me.plus i don;t like people getting balls out of my pocket

when billy says i would be better playing on tighter pockets against better players it has not worked that way for me

i have found better players shoot almost the same on tight pockets,but i don't

i believe the traditional size pocket of 4.75 is better,in golf the hole doesn't vary from course to course,why should it in pool

i am buying a centennial table with 4,75 because i like pool the way it was originally
i don't believe the newer tables are better

i might like playing a 9 ball player some one hole with tighter pockets to slow him down,but only
against players who don't know the game

efryn is running out on 4 inch pockets or 4,5,i need help he doesn't
 
Last edited:
So... i read through the first 6 pages of this, and skipped to the last as I was getting really bored LOL.
So hopefully no one has already covered what i am about to say... but here is my opinion:

I have an 8 Foot Fischer Elayna in my basement, and it gets pretty regular use. Whether it be a good thing or a bad thing, I am an agressive player, and I stroke pretty much every shot (even when i know i shouldnt). After the first month or so of owning my table i was getting rather pissed off about how often me table was spitting balls back out that i was convinced i hit DAMMMMM well.
So i measured the pockets, thinking that maybe Fischer just has tight pockets... nope 4 and 5/8th
So i asked a buddy of mine that is a very talented table mechanic that happens to install Fischer and CL Bailey tables on a daily basis (ownded by same company)... he shed some light on something that i had never thought of... POCKET FACING ANGLES

Although my pockets are 4 5/8 at the mouth, they narrow down to 4ish at the neck... so anything you hit firmish (half table draw speed i would say), you get a rattle and your blood pressure rises.

At first i did not fully understand what he meant, until we went to a local pool room that had diamond nine footers, one of which that that shimmed down to 4 1/4... so we played some sets, and i could not miss... everything that got near the pocket went in... it was because of the angle of the pocket facing... as long as you hit the face of the pocket, it would throw it to the back of the pocket...

So thats my piece... hope this might shed some light for someone else out there that is/was as confused as i was.
 
Well, its been some years and this that and the other has occurred to put pool where it is today. What say y'all about this nowadays, tight or no?

What is the best table that will encourage the growth of all "normal" games? Normal being 9 ball, 10 ball, rotation, onepocket 8 ball and banks?

Have at it.
 
Pro's should be playing nothing less than 4 inch pockets.

Speedy games full of "packages"? Bust out the bar tables.

Oh...now I see where this sport is going. Shit.
 
I'm with you to an extent. I like how difficult the game becomes on 4 to 4 1/4" pockets. I don't think other people, in general, would agree though. Especially as a spectator.

That's what I don't get. Why would anyone want to watch a so called professional goof off? These so called professionals can run racks on tables with 4 inch pockets, they just have to focus and try real hard.

Good. Make them focus and try real hard.
 
Doesn't matter! Only a few of us are going to watch anyway, there's no way in hell the sport/game is going to add any new spectators. Boring game, way past its prime.

if there was a 5 million dollar first place with a Kardashian playing then maybe a few viewers.....could you imagine that huge nasty @&& bent over the table - no thanks. But, that's what America do.
 
Why would it be any different than what Cardone said five years ago? Nothing's changed...

Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com

Well, its been some years and this that and the other has occurred to put pool where it is today. What say y'all about this nowadays, tight or no?

What is the best table that will encourage the growth of all "normal" games? Normal being 9 ball, 10 ball, rotation, onepocket 8 ball and banks?

Have at it.
 
That's what I don't get. Why would anyone want to watch a so called professional goof off? These so called professionals can run racks on tables with 4 inch pockets, they just have to focus and try real hard.

Good. Make them focus and try real hard.

I don't know of many pros that can run many consecutive racks of short rack banks. One of my points is that many (most?) players focus on 9 or 10 ball and maybe 8 ball that they neglect the other games. "Pool" is a collection of games, not one or the other. To me, they are all great games. So an "easy" table for 9 ball would not necessarily be that "easy" to run multiple racks of banks on. Or 14.1 for that matter. I think that I recall John Schmidt posting that he was more proud on his 200+ run on a diamond than his other ~400 ball run in 14.1 on another "looser" table.

Just sayin'...
 
Back
Top