He was at his peak 20 years before he won his 6 World 9 Ball Championships
Lassiter's name always come up whenever the greatest are mentioned. Does anyone know where to obtain video of him playing during his prime?
Majic,
Besides his 14.1 match with Cicero Murphy in the finals of the 1966 World 14.1 Championships, I am not aware of any other video of him until the "Legendary Stars of Pocket Billiards", which was filmed in 1982 & 1983.
Here's a link....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxobcdPCYwE
Video of Lassiter in his peak would be a treasure find! Here's why....
Luther Lassiter was born on Nov 5, 1918 and died at age 69 on Oct 25, 1988. He was already a great player by the time he was in his 20s, but, in the 1940's and 1950's, there were hardly any major 9 ball tournaments being held. 14.1 was still the main game. During this time, he was a road player and he traveled for years with another bonafide great player named Don Willis.
By the time the Johnson City tournaments came into being starting in 1961, Lassiter was already a legendary road player. Starting in 1962 (the 1st Johnson City 9 ball tournament) Lassiter dominated the field and won the first of his 6 World 9 ball championships. These Johnson City and Stardust tournaments were the defacto World Championships and they had fields that included Harold Worst, Ed Kelly, Irving Crane, Joe Balsis, Ronnie Allen, Danny Jones, Eddie Taylor, Larry Johnson, Jim Marino, Buddy Hall and many other great players. Lassiter won titles in 1962, 1963, 1964, 1967, 1969 and 1971. Keep in mind that at this time, he was 44 in 1962 and 53 in 1971....
***His peak as a player was argueably past, yet he still beat very, very talented players.
Now, not only was he a great TOURNAMENT player, he was also one of the greatest MONEY players that ever lived. His favorite game was "money pool", any game he could bet on. Believe me when I tell you this, his game went UP several notches for the cash. Some players play better in tournaments than they do when they gamble, and others, visa-versa. Lassiter was a better money player than a tournament player.
So, put those two facts together, add in his longevity at the top (30+ years) and I can make a very strong case for him. This of course does not take into consideration his 4 outright World 14.1 Championships, PLUS 5 14.1 Championships at Johnson City, 5 World All-Around Championships and 1 World 1 Pocket Championship and you have a very gifted player indeed.
Let's compare Luther to some other players. In the two major championships at 9 Ball, Efren has 1 World 9 Ball Championship in 1999 and 1 U.S. Open 9 Ball Championship in 1994. Sigel has 5 WC and 3 US Open's, Varner has 3 WC and back-to-back US Open titles. Archer, Hall, Souquet and Allen Hopkins all have more major 9 ball titles than Reyes' 2.
(Considering Reyes also has 6 World 8 Ball Championships, he is the greatest Rotation player ever, he is, in my opinion the greatest 1 pocket player ever and he is super at 14.1, I feel that Efren Reyes is the greatest all-around pool player ever. As an "all-around" player, Reyes is better than Lassiter and Strickland, but not at 9 ball.)
Consider this....Lassiter won 6 World 9 Ball Championships from the age of 44 till he was 53.
***How many more championships would he have won had there been 9 ball tournaments in the 2 previous decades?***
But there weren't any.
So, if he won 6 World Chamionships 20 years after his prime, what would he have been like from the 1940's to 1960's????
Compare that to Reyes, who has one (1) World 9 Ball Championship, in an era where for 10 plus years, there were 2 "World 9 Ball Championships" available every year! And Reyes has a total of 1. Besides Earl, I don't see any currently active player accumulating 6 World 9 ball Championships.
Lassiter, who didn't have tournaments to compete in until he was 44, still won 6 World 9 ball Championships.
(Earl is my choice for #2, with his 5 U.S. Open 9 ball Championships and his 6 World 9 ball Championships.) I feel Lassiter beats Earl in the "better money player" catagory as well as having a higher peak for a longer period.