US Open 10 ball & 8 ball is Back!

I understand what you're saying but I didn't say my room couldn't make it, it was actually a thriving business that did very well but it wasn't in the way I wanted it to be. Plenty of guys & couples or groups of couples like you spoke of in your post, out for an evenings entertainment, they drank, ate, banged balls, had fun. I really didn't want that. I wanted a clientele that really wanted to play at a high level, that spent a lot of time in the hall working on their game & competing in tournaments that took advantage of the full service bar and restaurant. What I ended up with was the social players out for an evenings entertainment that also wanted live music on Friday & Saturday nights which doesn't really mix with serious pool. I felt like it was possible to have both serious players & those that played for a night out but aspects like the live music suited one crowd in the social players but turned off my hardcore players. So while financially successful it wasn't what I had envisioned in that I spent a lot of time running a business that owed its success to the social set and entertainment & wasn't based in serious pool as I wanted so I sold & moved on. To some in my life and this business it seemed crazy that I would do what I did as it was making good money. I would have been happy to be less successful & made a small profit or broke even and be more pool focused than entertainment focused. I realized that I could have eliminated the entertainment options but that it wouldn't have made it on just pool so I got out.

I really believe gambling could be the key, what pro pool needs. Not the hustle but sanctioned gambling. Developing a system where you have a group of professionals, personalities & a tour or series of events that people can wager on legally. People could relate to the personalities in the game, cheer for them, wager on them. I really believe it could work in that it would attract even those that don't play just because they'd have the ability to wager on it. As I stated in my first post, people love to gamble, sanction it, market it &. Give the people a group of players & events they can bet on, the fan base will come.



I too would very much like to see what you've mentioned here, organized play that could be wagered on.

Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that, nor do I have the time or capitol to invest. And, those that do have the expertise, time and the capitol choose not to do so with pool. Maybe there's a reason for that, I don't know.

What I do know is that in a free market society, if there's an opportunity out there for a legitimate profit, someone will find it and create whatever is necessary to find that profit. Risk versus reward is the governing rule that determines whether or not it's going to happen. Apparently, at least for now, the risk is not worth the reward.

I'd love to see that change

Royce
 
At Large, Very nice stats indeed!! When I interpret them they basically show that the top pros got out from everywhere on the equipment in the events from your study..

But to answer your question, no it doesn't change my thinking. I'm saying 8 ball games are played differently on 7 vs 9 foot tables. 7 foot tables require more precision and breaking up of clusters, etc and to me it's more exciting to watch vs 9 foot tables. And on 9 foot tables the players have more breathing room. One either table, based on your stats, they do extremely well. And on today's ice like cloth that is usually brand new at these events they are both easy and fairly boring to watch.

But if I had to pick which ice like clothed table I still like watching pros on 7 footers vs 9 footers playing 8 ball.

There is one exception, the IPT setup with the nappy cloth and the tight pockets was more enjoyable to me then fairly easy pockets with new slick cloth.

Or even 8 ball on a tight pool hall table with worn out cloth would be fun to watch.

But 8 ball on easy 7 or 9 footers is boring to me, where 7 footers would be less boring..

Take a look at post #167. Does that affect your thinking at all?
 
Last edited:
How do you account for the fact that there are more run outs on the 7 footers ?

First I would say the difference in percentages is marginal. Second could it be that the Shane/Earl table was tougher than the CSI tables and that the Accu-stats 9 footer is fairly tough with older cloth? And third, could the humidity situation have been different? Forth, while I enjoy seeing stats and analysis it's only from three very different events.

• Break-and-run games:
Shane/Earl -- 46% (24 of 52)
CSI -- 54% (118 of 218)
Accu-Stats -- 50% (59 of 117)

• Breaker run-outs on successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Shane/Earl -- 77% (24 of 31)
CSI -- 77% (118 of 154)
Accu-Stats -- 69% (59 of 85)

• Non-breaker run-outs in 1st inning after unsuccessful breaks:
Shane/Earl -- 86% (18 of 21)
CSI -- 69% (44 of 64)
Accu-Stats -- 66% (21 of 32)

• Run-outs by first player to shoot after the break:
Shane/Earl -- 81% (42 of 52)
CSI -- 74% (162 of 218)
Accu-Stats -- 68% (80 of 117)
 
After thinking about it, I am just happy they are going to have open, pro caliber events at the BCAPL this year. I wasn't much interested in watching the invitational matches last year. I like the multiple tables of a larger event, letting me see more players and choose who I want to watch.

But I will not change my mind that having any bar table event as a Mosconi Cup event is wrong. Let's say this was 5 - 10 years ago. I'm hesitant to name names without offending someone so I'll pick -- Jesse Bowman (who I don't care if I offend) and Jason Kirkwood (who knows I appreciate his skill). When they were playing, both would be one of the favorites to win (or place very high) in these 5 bar table events. But as a fan of the US, I wouldn't want either one playing on the Mosconi Cup team on big tables.
 
I don't want the best BB players make the MC to play on a 9' table. I think Matchroom better get another country to make fools out of. The cup is a joke to me now. Went from one of my favorites to I don't give a $hit. Johnnyt
 
I would venture to say it's all about $. I would also venture to say that you're right when you speak of a lot of captive audience players there not knowing of AZ or a lot of things that are going on in pool so this begs the question "why don't they". I believe it's because most league players that everyone seems so interested in drawing in don't give a damn about pool. Pool for them is a league night of drinking and socializing, they just happen to be playing pool while they do it, that's all. You say the attraction they hold is the money they can spend. Considering your position in the industry that's understandable as they are the majority of people that buy into the new "LD" thing, well them and the elite players you give those cues to in that if they play with them then Joe Schmo the 1 night a week 8 ball league player might say, "well so & so uses this cue so it must be great" and buy one with the super duper x-14-z1 shaft with our new low deflection ferrule and turbo overdrive. It is what it is.

I've owned a hall, 10,000 sq ft., 21-9' tables, 8-8' tables with a full bar and restaurant. Against my better judgement I relented & let the APA bring leagues in several nights a week for 2 sessions before I put an end to it. Why? It was my experience they did more damage than good. They had little respect for the equipment, never really came in to patronize my place other than their league night, didn't patronize my kitchen when they were there & the only money they did spend was on alcohol which they spilled liberally and after having enough would plop their asses up on the rails breaking it from the backing & giving the table dead rails. That was enough for me to put an end to it.

While my business was successful I had to put up with things I didn't like for it to be so, live music, etc. things that really don't go well with serious pool which was what I wanted but that wouldn't do it alone so with a heavy heart I sold it.

I agree pool needs to do something to attract a fan base but I what I think it is that it needs everyone says is what has been its problem, Gambling. If you look at where legal gambling in this country was 20 years ago & where it is now I'd say that it's hard to argue that it isn't popular. Lotteries, Casinos EVERYWHERE, poker which exploded. Is that because poker is such an interesting game to play or watch? No, it's because there is gambling involved. It's what pool needs, not watering down the game by playing on toy tables to appeal to a group of people that don't really love it or have a passion for it using some misguided logic that because the bangers play league night on 7'ers that if you switch pro events to 7's it will attract that crowd into caring about pro pool.

I'll close with this, I spent my life in this game, growing up in my fathers hall, then as a gambler & road warrior until the Internet & technology killed the road. Then as a hall owner who couldn't reconcile myself to the compromises I had to make to pool to have that large a hall. When I sold my hall I traveled awhile, to the Philippines mostly, because people there loved the same 2 things I love most, pool and gambling. From the slums of olongapo to the nicest halls in Manila those were 2 things you could find anywhere there, pool and gambling. I found myself in some "interesting places", some little more than shacks with a table and some seating but there was action. You know what else there was? Immaculately kept 9' tables. In that poor a country, in some of the most unusual places you could find a 9' table, a game and action. Are you really telling me that couldn't be done here? Pool needs legalized gambling, not pro events on 7' tables. I find it ironic that no matter where you go in the world where pool is exploding that the one thing you won't find is a bar box, the US is the only place that they're prevalent. Give people something that they can gamble on & you will have your fan base.


Very well Said!
 
I think he was addressing that toward me, and so I'll reply to justadub.
Perhaps if the league players showed the least bit of etiquette there wouldn't be that bias you speak of. You act as if I or anyone else who doesn't like leagues must just have the anti-league gene. It couldn't possibly be that the league members have by their own actions brought this upon themselves. I didn't start out disliking leagues it was a learned reaction.

There is a former room owner in this very thread, who brought the leagues into his room and and after just two sessions abandoned the idea, because of the way they acted. I guess he just had an anti-league bias too. You your self say this anti-league bias is expected here on AZ. I wonder why that is, or did you never question the reason.

Pool it's just a night out for them, where they can BS, maybe have a few beers, stand in the way of any poor sole unlucky enough to be renting a table anywhere near them, and if you dare say something they will get indignant and say something like "well you shouldn't be playing next to the league anyway" like you would be if you had any other possible choice. How many times is to many, to have to say please excuse me ???

Edit to ad: One night I was playing with someone and the league players started a league match right next to our table, okay. So this one person score keeping for that match pulls a chair up so close to the ends of their table and mine that every time I had to take a shot from there I'd have to look back to see if I was going to hit him. So I finally asked if he could please move back a little, and his reply was, you shouldn't be playing here next to the league match, oh really ??? There were other tables open that they could have started their league match on, they choose to use the table right next to us. This is the dumb thinking and attitude, that just turns people against the leagues. Yet you won't see other league members step in to correct or explain to that league member where they were wrong. I guess it's just easier to blame it on us, saying that we're bias, when league players act like that.

Instead of a simple sorry I guess I shouldn't have been standing two feet from your table with my back toward it, you are right, I don't own the place because I come in once a week to play in a league.

Then you have the four, that's right four, league players who decide to try and stand between the table you're playing on and the next table, along the long side of the table your playing on where there is just enough room for your stance and if your cue ball is on the rail, your butt will touch the adjacent table. The adjacent table where no one is playing because the league players have decided to dump all their stuff on it and use it for a coat check, that is when their not trying to use it as a chair. I'd like to see a non league player stand two feet from a table the league matches are being played on with their back to it, repeatedly through out the night and see the reaction, I'll tell you what it would be, they'd have a fit, and rightfully so.

These people aren't real Pool players and never will be, it's just a night out for them, you could replace the word Pool with any other activity and they wouldn't really be into that activity either, it's a night out for them, period. The could care less about anybody else around them or the equipment (9' gold crowns) and they make that crystal clear. It gets old week after week.

They don't have junk leagues like ours in other countries they get serious players and run the leagues right, the leagues here are like some carnival side show. it's best to just stay away from the Pool rooms on league nights. The leagues players show no courtesy what so ever, then people will say "well they just don't know any better", and if that were true that's one thing. The truth is they they don't know any better because they simply don't care, the proof of this is if they did care over time they would start to show more courtesy and that simply doesn't happen. -----------------> One can only feign ignorance for so long.

If there's a anti-league bias here on AZ as you say, trust me there's a reason, and you can find that reason by looking at how league players act.

This doesn't mean I am talking about you, I am talking about leagues in general. I know there are some good people that play in the leagues.
I wasn't born or raised to dislike leagues, I assure you. This was a learned reaction.



The usual anti-league bias is present in this thread, which is to be expected here on AZB.

I hear you.

Pretty discouraging, to this lowly league player.

Over and out.
 
2 years ago i mentioned to a few people pool in America was going to be on the bar table, if Mark wants to do a big bar table then we should be glad of another big event to play in. I agree with Justin and a few others the name should be different.

I mentioned to Greg about doing a pro 10ft tour at the pool rooms that have the diamond 10fts, but also said for this to work he would have to do a $5000 added bar table event at the same time, as this draws the players.

It's a shame that the game is going to the smaller table, but at least there will be more events for the players to actually play in.

I don't agree with the bar table events being mosconi ranking events, but we will see how that unfolds and works out.

It would be great if the big bar table events could have some monster calcuttas as well. 7ft pool isn't ideal for pro players, but you have to adapt.

The game as far as recreactinal yes is moving to 7 fts been that way for awhile ,, however ,,to coin any event as a U.S. Open with out adding the bar box tag is a farce
In golf the U.S. open , is a tournament that offers the highest degree of difficulty from tee to green ,
What we have here is exactly the opposit , it's simply not worthy of the U.S. Open tag
As much as I don't like Berry he's a purist and if he ever sells the U.S. open 9 ball I hope he does it with the stipulation that it always is played on a 9 ft table
All world events should follow that suit
 
Last edited:
People don't hate leagues.

Some people hate the fact that the game is being made easier in an attempt to draw in viewership/attendance from league players that in all reality could give two shits about the professional pool player.

If I'm an APA 3 watching Shane run out rack after rack on a 7' table with huge pockets. I'm not saying, "Oh wow, look at that guy. He's playing on the same table I play on." No, I'm saying, "Oh, he ran out again. How boring."

There's a reason people give standing ovations whenever someone gets a maximum in snooker. Because it's hard as shit, and the fans understand and respect the difficulty of the game.

Difficult conditions cause more misses. More misses leads to tension and drama. Tension and drama leads to excitement.
 
People don't hate leagues.

Some people hate the fact that the game is being made easier in an attempt to draw in viewership/attendance from league players that in all reality could give two shits about the professional pool player.

If I'm an APA 3 watching Shane run out rack after rack on a 7' table with huge pockets. I'm not saying, "Oh wow, look at that guy. He's playing on the same table I play on." No, I'm saying, "Oh, he ran out again. How boring."

There's a reason people give standing ovations whenever someone gets a maximum in snooker. Because it's hard as shit, and the fans understand and respect the difficulty of the game.

Difficult conditions cause more misses. More misses leads to tension and drama. Tension and drama leads to excitement.

I understand your perspective and would prefer the 9 footer for these tourneys too. However, the pockets on the Diamonds they will be playing on aren't gigantic- most don't fit two balls in one pocket.
 
Greg Sullivan is considering some changes in 9 ball at Derby City and I think would appreciate any feedback on this idea.

Roll out at any time during the game. If whoever takes the shot after the rollout misses the shot, it is ball in hand for the opposing player.

This would eliminate lucky hooks or bad leaves after missing shots and more importantly, keep players from playing position to play a safety. It would actually speed up play and make the game more offensive again.

I am old and traditional do not like change much, but after mulling this over, think this will work to speed up the game and make it more offensive and exciting for the fans.

We should probably start a separate thread on this to get some feedback from the AZ community.
jrhendy,

This sounds like the traditional 2 foul rules if I'm reading correctly. I like Mike Page's suggestion of compulsory push out after the break too, so the luck of the break doesn't play such a big part in the outcome.

Colin
 
It seems that I've read quite a bit about this "Anti League" sentiment.

Most of the posts that seem to be against leagues all have similar stories to tell about how league players act and why they are disliked so much.

I have to admit that I too would be uncomfortable if I witnessed some of the things that have been mentioned, but I have to add that there are many leagues that are quite different.

Our league in North Dallas Texas is quite the opposite. The competition is very high in the higher level divisions as well as having some more entry level players in the lower level divisions. But virtually all who play in the leagues are courteous and thoughtful of each other as well as the places that we play.

I really think the differences come down to a number of things.

The people, the people and the people.

I very much enjoy the people in our leagues.

I guess the moral of the story is that not all leagues are filled with people who don't really care about anything.


Royce
 
After thinking about it, I am just happy they are going to have open, pro caliber events at the BCAPL this year. I wasn't much interested in watching the invitational matches last year. I like the multiple tables of a larger event, letting me see more players and choose who I want to watch.

But I will not change my mind that having any bar table event as a Mosconi Cup event is wrong. Let's say this was 5 - 10 years ago. I'm hesitant to name names without offending someone so I'll pick -- Jesse Bowman (who I don't care if I offend) and Jason Kirkwood (who knows I appreciate his skill). When they were playing, both would be one of the favorites to win (or place very high) in these 5 bar table events. But as a fan of the US, I wouldn't want either one playing on the Mosconi Cup team on big tables.

Good call Watchez, will still miss the 9fts though. :(
 
Jerry

Well, I'm not sure you get my point then.

I don't think it's reasonable to expect Diamond or any other company to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars to create a very small number of very special tables that they won't sell to anyone just so we can have a challenging event for the Pro Players. It shouldn't even be a consideration.

Now if there was a market for those tables that's a different story. But, if there was there would already be tables being made to fill it.


Royce

Royce, I did get your point and I did not intend to start a debate or argument with you but was rather only attempting to add a point of view that I felt would be helpful to those that want to promote more fan/spectator participation in their tournaments.

I do not know the intricacies of table manufacturing but I do know a lot about building display fixtures. In my business when we need to utilize the space given us to the maximum advantage we sometimes build a custom fixture to fit. While it is easier to cut to a particular pattern and assemble a number of the same fixtures it is not that much more costly to make a few custom adjustments to better suit what we have to work with and maximize our sales results. As I said, it is not my intention to argue this point and I fully accept that I do not know what is involved but I had understood that it was not that difficult to customize rails and pocket sizes. Again, my point was simply that it would be beneficial to present our sport in a way that would help build the fan base. I was thinking less of a market for these tables (other than pro tournaments) and more of a market for professional pool.

I also find that the vast majority of league players are more avid than how they have been described in some of the posts in this thread. I know that most are not exposed to the opportunity to watch the pro’s play, live or on a stream. I was only able to become an avid fan after finding and joining AZ Billiards (my journey to identify and buy a proper cue is a story in itself). I would venture that most league players do not have a grasp on what is going on at the pro level because they have not been made aware of the resources available. I am still surprised (I shouldn’t be) when I mention a tournament or a live stream and someone who has played for a number of years in the league has no idea of what I am talking about. When I refer them to AZ live stream forum they are often unaware that it exists.

For these reasons I use myself as a barometer when thinking about how to make pool more widely acceptable as a fan experience. I love pool, want to watch good pool, have travelled many miles to attend live tournaments as a spectator, am probably one of the few who pays for the Mosconi Cup stream official source knowing up front that it is available on a free stream and the free stream is a better quality and yes I watch the free stream because of the quality but believe that one must support these events so I also pay. If I, the pool fanatic, find some matches between the top players boring how can the casual fan, or more importantly, new fans, be brought into the fold? My opinion is based on what the Bigfoot challenge and the China 8 Ball has shown me.

As an aside, I also have been surprised at the comments of rude league players. It is not something that I have experienced having played in many different league environments. In my travels I have visited many different pool halls and bars with pool tables and have found the regulars to be welcoming and gracious.

Respectfully,
Jerry
 
jrhendy,

This sounds like the traditional 2 foul rules if I'm reading correctly. I like Mike Page's suggestion of compulsory push out after the break too, so the luck of the break doesn't play such a big part in the outcome.

Colin

It isn't the traditional 2 foul rule. It's ball in hand after any missed shot following a push out.

I push out and you don't like the shot. I do not pocket the ball and you get ball in hand. Same thing if you take the shot after the push out and miss, I get ball in hand.

I believe Greg's thinking is players will quit playing position to play safe and it will create a more offensive game.

I know he is fairly serious about this and we should hear more about it before the next Derby City. The goal is to make the game more offensive and entertaining for the players and fans. The downside might be it will eliminate the kicks since players will just push out most of the time.
 
After thinking about it, I am just happy they are going to have open, pro caliber events at the BCAPL this year. I wasn't much interested in watching the invitational matches last year. I like the multiple tables of a larger event, letting me see more players and choose who I want to watch.

But I will not change my mind that having any bar table event as a Mosconi Cup event is wrong. Let's say this was 5 - 10 years ago. I'm hesitant to name names without offending someone so I'll pick -- Jesse Bowman (who I don't care if I offend) and Jason Kirkwood (who knows I appreciate his skill). When they were playing, both would be one of the favorites to win (or place very high) in these 5 bar table events. But as a fan of the US, I wouldn't want either one playing on the Mosconi Cup team on big tables.

Alex Olinger plays pretty damn good on a bar box. He may just get some of them points.

How many events in total are Mosconi points events?
 
Alex Olinger plays pretty damn good on a bar box. He may just get some of them points.

How many events in total are Mosconi points events?


Alex has a tough road. Tourangeau this morning, another bar table specialist and then if he wins he plays Sossei. Potentially Jason Shaw after that.

Ozzy posted that there are 10 events -- 5 bar table (3 in Reno and I'll make the assumption 2 in July in Vega$), and 5 big table (DCC 9 Ball, SBE, US Open and two others that haven't been named).

In Reno right now, Brian Deska is in the final 8 of the winner's side. Again, no offense to Brian, but I have never heard his name in my life. Looks like he is from the Washington DC area and never played in a CSI event before. Edited to add - looks like a strong regional player from Virginia according to Action Pool Tour results. He must be able to obviously play on a bar table - beat Ernesto 7-4 and Shaun Wilkie 7-4 last night. I hope he snaps the tournament off and moves up towards the top of the Mosconi Cup points.

Press releases say that the rankings can be found on http://www.matchroompool.com/home but I can't find it on their site. Is it just me but pool sites are the worst to navigate thru? The only one that ever got it right was the IPT.
 
Last edited:
Alex has a tough road. Tourangeau this morning, another bar table specialist and then if he wins he plays Sossei. Potentially Jason Shaw after that.

Ozzy posted that there are 10 events -- 5 bar table (3 in Reno and I'll make the assumption 2 in July in Vega$), and 5 big table (DCC 9 Ball, SBE, US Open and two others that haven't been named).

In Reno right now, Brian Deska is in the final 8 of the winner's side. Again, no offense to Brian, but I have never heard his name in my life. Looks like he is from the Washington DC area and never played in a CSI event before. Edited to add - looks like a strong regional player from Virginia according to Action Pool Tour results. He must be able to obviously play on a bar table - beat Ernesto 7-4 and Shaun Wilkie 7-4 last night. I hope he snaps the tournament off and moves up towards the top of the Mosconi Cup points.

Press releases say that the rankings can be found on http://www.matchroompool.com/home but I can't find it on their site. Is it just me but pool sites are the worst to navigate thru? The only one that ever got it right was the IPT.

Brian is a monster his dad Ed was a top tier 1 pocket player
He's won several of Ozzys APT events and is a class act

1
 
Brian is a monster his dad Ed was a top tier 1 pocket player
He's won several of Ozzys APT events and is a class act

1

Never said he wasn't --- did you see my edit in red after I looked him up. Mark Wilson said last year he wanted new blood on the Mosconi, looks like if Brian keeps it up, he is on his way to bringing it to the team.
 
Back
Top