South AfricaThat was a good game, it could have gone either way but I think Judd had reached level.
Well played to Theron he held his nerve and played solid…only question for me now is who I’m I going support?
South AfricaThat was a good game, it could have gone either way but I think Judd had reached level.
Well played to Theron he held his nerve and played solid…only question for me now is who I’m I going support?
I heard him on the phone:Chang got the phone call . Dump the first 6 games
Ruiz is a top notch player though. He doesn't have to fold, ever.Not sure what happened against Ruiz. But this level of play by Shane will be hard to beat.
Totally agreed. Shane came with a 5 pack and then couldn’t get back in the game, and he had chances. Not a knock on FSR at all. Very impressive and he’s improvement over the years is among the highest among many.Ruiz is a top notch player though. He doesn't have to fold, ever.
That would be because you're WRONG maybe???? Americans include most of the best Euros... Most of the best Euros and some flips live here and play here the MAJORITY of the time Shaw, Appleton, etc...I've been making the point for years that America now sucks at pool. Every time I say it I get dumped on and with every world class tournament I'm proven right again. We've got SVB and nobody. I would have only been worse if Taiwan and China were here.
Is it single elimination now?
Theron 10-11: Implied rating ~710 given Theron's rating of 741I enjoyed watching Judd Trump play, he did pretty well and his break was decent.
Some theory crafting, what are your thoughts on where his FargoRate will end up after these matches?
My estimate: 720.
I don't know if he has played enough to have a FargoRate - I guess there is a minimum number of matches/racks to be played. I think 720-740 is a reasonable guess. If he does learn from this, plays more often and shakes off the lack of composure when way behind in a winner breaks format, then he could creep up above 750. Hypothetically, if he gave up snooker and dedicated himself to pool then maybe 780-790 but beyond that the proof could only be in the pudding.I enjoyed watching Judd Trump play, he did pretty well and his break was decent.
Some theory crafting, what are your thoughts on where his FargoRate will end up after these matches?
My estimate: 720.
He also beat a 733 player 11-5 in his third match.Theron 10-11: Implied rating ~710 given Theron's rating of 741
Shaw 1-11: Implied rating ~375 given Shaw's 800+ rating
Patel 9-2: Not in FargoRate. Patel lost to a 732 player 9-0.
Magee 9-0: Also not in FargoRate but lost to a 696-rated player 9-2.
Unless there is more data out there, the Shaw games represent a large chunk of his performance and will hurt his rating a lot. The other three matches would probably peg him in the low 700s as you suggest.
You need 200 games to be considered robust, but you can have a rating after just a few games.I don't know if he has played enough to have a FargoRate - I guess there is a minimum number of matches/racks to be played. I think 720-740 is a reasonable guess. If he does learn from this, plays more often and shakes off the lack of composure when way behind in a winner breaks format, then he could creep up above 750. Hypothetically, if he gave up snooker and dedicated himself to pool then maybe 780-790 but beyond that the proof could only be in the pudding.
Thanks, I missed that - the Alshammari games suggest ~875 performance. So that would make it more likely he's above 700 once the ratings are updated.He also beat a 733 player 11-5 in his third match.
Haven't you figured it out yet, those days are long gone!!!
Yep, they can set FargoRate based on other data and have done in the past.You need 200 games to be considered robust, but you can have a rating after just a few games.
Jaden
If he gave up snooker, he'd better have a wife or GF with a job and a place to live so she can support him while he practices and learns to gamble until he can finally make a 5 figure income!I don't know if he has played enough to have a FargoRate - I guess there is a minimum number of matches/racks to be played. I think 720-740 is a reasonable guess. If he does learn from this, plays more often and shakes off the lack of composure when way behind in a winner breaks format, then he could creep up above 750. Hypothetically, if he gave up snooker and dedicated himself to pool then maybe 780-790 but beyond that the proof could only be in the pudding.
Hmm... Might be on to something here...And again, all Americans out, SVB in final 16, almost the same year after year. I guess that American belief that gambling makes you a better player don't really compare much to PRACTICE like you WANT to be a PROFESSIONAL POOL PLAYER!
It is true that there aren't very many American players who are competitive against the world's best, but one guy who can bring it sometimes against the best is notably absent from this year's tournament: BergmanAnd again, all Americans out, SVB in final 16, almost the same year after year. I guess that American belief that gambling makes you a better player don't really compare much to PRACTICE like you WANT to be a PROFESSIONAL POOL PLAYER!