Hi Lou,
I'll partially agree with your post, but I don't feel you have to be a 'real good' player to be the coach. I also think the coach should be 'american' - I'm just not sure what that means. Does that mean a US citizen? It probably wouldn't be a deciding factor.
The coach does not need to be currently competing-that would mean drawing from what many feel 'is the problem' of the current players.
Coaching and playing are related- but not joined at the hip.
I agree that respect is important. And I agree the coach needs to know how to win, and transfer that understanding to the Mosconi team. A coach motivates the players. His tools are psychological as much as physical. He must command the respect of the team, but doesn't really need to be a fierce competitor on the tabl. He does need to be a fierce competitor off the table.
I can think of a couple who would do great, but no guarantee of winning.i also think that the coach should be coaching, if you want a PR person, then have one. Keep the coach in his comfort zone so he can tend to his duties.
And that's what I think - lol.
Mark Griffin
Coaching and playing are related- but not joined at the hip.
IMO - If the person can motivate people to win, then he or she can make a very good Captain. Trump is a prime example... What does he know about pool (let alone international politics)? But he knows how to motivate people!
---
That aside; you not thinking of throwing your cap in Mark? :thumbup:
Jason