you should know that a lot of real buyers for higher priced cues will not bother to respond without a price.
Nice looking cue. It is a # 14 from the 3rd catalogue. Quite a few were made but still nice looking for an unrestored cue. Post a price and it would do much better. I agree Nick that doesn't look like a Szam forarm. Wrong colors and too short. I would say 1000.00 tops.
maha and Wedge are correct. I might be interested in your cue as well but without a price listed I won't go to the next step, which is asking about the weight of the butt & shafts, lengths, straightness, etc. which should also have been described in your post.
......................................The one thing that always gets me is the statement "accepting reasonable offers". It begs the question, reasonable to who? To me since I'm the one that made the offer? Or to you, the seller? If it is to you the seller, then you need to give me what your expectations are. How can I make an offer that you would consider reasonable without knowing what your reasonable is? (but I think we all know where the asking price is going since you were warned that the Blue Book of Cues said the foil made it 150%....)
Anyway, I think I used to own that cue.....I sold it (or one just like it) years ago at the Hopkins Expo. I had three shafts as well. Just sayin.......
Bob
Serdula offered $850 that seems fair to me
are you asking more than that?
\You could pawn this stick for that .. you own a pawn shop or what? Have you been watching too many episodes of Pawn Stars?
Canwin
You could pawn this stick for that .. you own a pawn shop or what? Have you been watching too many episodes of Pawn Stars?
Canwin