I will answer all of your questions, but I love the fact that you have twisted all of my views on the situation. I have never BLAMED KT fot anything

nor do I ever remember "requiring" Kevin to do anything.
CaptiveBred said:
I have not read all your posts so you may have answered this already. I'll ask anyways.
The fact that you have not read any of my posts should turn a light in that says that your opinion of my position may be flawed. Don't you think?
CaptiveBred said:
Why can't KT run his business the way he wants to? Is there something wrong with that? Why does he have to care about his competitors? I want to know why KT has to.
Who is telling him to run his business any other way than what he wants? Nobody. He was invited into the world organization and the sanctioning fees are commensurate with the prize fund. Bigger prize fund, bigger sanctioning fees. You keep skipping around the facts that Kevin was unhappy with that and he decided that he did not want to be part of the organization. The WPA statement by Ian Anderson outlines the position of the WPA. If the message seems harsh, well so is business. The WPA has every right to protect their own interests. Nobody has ever told him to how to run his tour, mainly because he isolated the IPT from the outset.
On the flip end of your question, a separate body set up to protect the players would be non IPT funded and non IPT regulated. It would be set up to protect the interests of the players in the event that the IPT folded. It would protect them from being out of a job and without a tour to play on. I'm sure Kevin has something set up to protect him, why can't the players have something where they are not left out in the cold like they were in 1998? No player that I have spoken with has said that this is a bad idea. Those players range from unknowns to hall of famers. This would not be set up to tell KT how to run his business at all. This would assist the players in legal matters and arbitration. This way the players have some say so in what goes on with their future. They will be treated like people instead of circus animals. Why is it that you think this is a bad thing?
CaptiveBred said:
Don't you think its unfair of you to require KT to group up with the WPA? That should be his choice since its his money. I can respect that. Why can't you?
Listen, it was his choice to break off communications. This is from his own admission. He can do whatever likes, but then again the same can be said for the WPA. If he doesn't want to be part of the established world body, that's his own business, but when he says they have done absolutely nothing for pool - he is dead wrong and I have every right to point that out, and so does John Lewis, Jorgen Sandman, and Ian Anderson. Personally I could care less what he does with his money.
CaptiveBred said:
Why don't you blame the players? They are the ones who will ruin the other tours... Not KT. Agree?
Wow... in a desperate attempt to sound intelligent you try to create a wedge between the players and I. How clever.
The players will go where the money is, plain and simple. Its about survival. Ask any player I have spoken to about the IPT - I have encouraged every one of them to do their best and to take advantage of this situation, however, I have told them to be extremely careful. I have also told them not to burn bridges with the smaller tours. The players are in the position where they must choose. That is because of the IPT, not anybody else. The WPA will go on with or without the IPT, and likewise, the IPT will go on without the WPA.
CaptiveBred said:
The players can play where they are invited to play. That may be the IPT or a WPA sanctioned event. Its their choice... Not KT's. Agree?
Not if they are signed to an exclusivity contract with the IPT. That would be the player's decision, but what you are asking has been experienced before with the Camel Pro Tour. The players decided, other tours were shut out in the cold and they eventually folded, and in the end the players were left with nothing and everybody sat there pointing fingers at each other. I would much rather see the IPT succeed, grow, and flourish than to see that happen again. That is why I hope KT will re-open the lines of comunication with the world body. Nobody there is after his money or trying to control what he has established.
CaptiveBred said:
You seem to put the blame on KT but its the players who will decide not to show up for the smaller tours. Won't they be responsible for the collapse of non IPT events? What if they all got nine to fives? Would their employers be responsible for the US Open?
Who is blaming KT for anything? KT is being given misinformation from people that have virtually no knowledge of the WPA/WCBS, or by those that have a grudge to settle with the WPA/WCBS. By this I am saying that he is been given poor advisement in his dealings with the World Organizaions, and that isn't fair to Kevin and its definitely not fair to the players.
Your US Open question has nothing to do with this conversation.
CaptiveBred said:
Obviously, you do not respect KT as a person
THESE ARE YOUR WORDS, NOT MINE. FTR, NICE TRY AT PUTTING WORDS INTO MY MOUTH.
CaptiveBred said:
but you should respect, and accept, his freedom of choice. He owes you, and pool nothing. If the IPT folded today, he has already left the players for the better.
In what way? lol. Perhaps the 150 players on the list have made some cash,but that does include everybody? Tell that to CJ Wiley or Reed Pierce or Jeannette Lee. If it folded today they would have gotten nothing out of it, and that's a shame.
CaptiveBred said:
I really would like to read sincere answers to the questions. It could help determine if your position is mental/emotional or that of a realistic position on the subject.
I like the IPT and the excitement it has brought pool. I think its great. Too bad this era in pool will be dark for you. The rest of us are going to remember it as good times and a real nice change for our sport/game. You should try to enjoy it. Afterall, your enjoyment of the game and all its goingson is all you have controll over. Be positive BJ. Its all about your enjoyment. Its a game, not brain surgery
First of all, I love the way you address this situation in the terms that you
should have all along. Take that whatever way you want to.

This is not a dark era for pool. I have said all along that the IPT is a great thing for the players - monetarily. However, it is not representative of what many want for pool. 8 Ball may get you excited (or is it the money - be honest). The IPT is good for the money, but is it good for pool in the long term or the short term? Have they committed themselves to supporting the sport in all areas, including player development at the lowest level? Probably not. 25 years ago you did not have the international group of players that you do today. A large reason that the best players are coming from Europe in Asia is because of the programs set in place by work done behind the scenes by people that you have never heard of. It was fitting that an EPBF bred player won the last event. Thorsten is a product of how much the game of pocket billiards has grown in Germany and Europe. I was over there when all of that work started. Were you?
You alluded to the fact that I am upset that I am either not a part of the IPT or that I am upset because I am not playing. I don't need the money and I am not desperately wishing and hoping that the IPT succeeds. Whether or not it succeeds is not going to effect my life very much personally or financially. There are players that need this to succeed like they need air to breathe. I realize that. Does the IPT? I hope that they do and that they take measures to fine tune their organization for the sake of the players. I say that because I don't think they'll have anywhere to go if the IPT fails - UNLESS
somebody realizes the weaknesses in the IPT structure and takes advantage of those weaknesses. Then the players could be faced with another decision, or at least they would have a choice. It all comes down to whether or not you have a vision and your working towards something. The IPT is trying to give the players the illusion that they have arrived at some great vision, but is it really what they wanted or are they just settling for the cash? I believe that there is a market out there for 9 ball,10 ball, banks, one pocket, and straight pool. There is also a market to display our game in its truest form to the public.
Pool has failed miserably because we keep trying to present it as something its not. Present it as what it is and it will reap the rewards that it deserves. Present the action at the table, on the rail, and behind the scenes. Present it honestly and accurately and the public will be enthralled with it just like you and I were when we were drawn to the game. Just a thought.