Foreward: If I type anything in caps, I'm not yelling. Just trying to put emphasis on certain things. Hopefully this will be my last post on the subject....
Rick,
It has been stated here numerous times that what happens after contact has absolutely ZERO INFLUENCE on the CB. The only thing that the CB knows is where it was struck, and the speed of the hit. THAT'S IT...NOTHING MORE.
I already showed you in another thread that with the pendulum stroke, the CB is (in most cases) hit while the cue is at the bottom of the pendulum. I also showed you that it's at that exact moment the cue is straight and as level as possible. OPINION: It's my belief that the so called "sweet spot" is determined by one's bridge and possibly arm length. /OPINION
In any case, yes, the cue will arc AFTER CONTACT. So you can choose to use a piston stroke, and not let that happen, but you are NOT GETTING ANYTHING EXTRA OUT OF THE CB.
If you seriously have any questions, then I will be convinced of one, possibly two things.
1. You have a comprehension problem.
2. You're a troll.
-Jon
Jon,
I think # 1 & 2 might make you a troll because their intention can ONLY be meant to insight an emotional response from me.
You are wrong both about me & the pendulum stroke. You are merely repeating what you have been told. If you can not understand that your 'identical' statements were faulty & that it is easier to hit the exact target with a straight/'level' moving tip vs one that is moving on 3 arcs then I don't know what to say because we have no common ground from which to discuss the issue. Why do... know I won't ask that question. It would probably start a whole other derail.
I have asked you 2 questions multiple times & like Neil, etc. you will not answer the questions that I have asked you. I won't ask them again.
But I now have a few others for you now that your attitude has changed.
Why do you think randyG made the assertion of the several inches of 'level' tip travel for a fixed elbow pendulum stroke yet Bob Jewitt's charting of the tip travel for such a stroke does not support that?
Why has no certified instructor given any bio-mechanical explanation to support randyG's assertion & 2 instructors in the 'sweet spot' thread basically agreed that there is no 'level' tip movement but if there was, it would be miniscule & certainly nowhere near 2 inches.
Neil continually saying that a detailed explanation has been given is simply a mis-statement. If he is referring to what he suggested. His 'detailed' 'explanation' was to merely suggest a loose grip so the cue weight could be supported by the different fingers during the stroke as it 'rocks' across the fingers. That actually increases the slope without a countering wrist action & increases the chance for error which makes a perfect set up even more crucial.
Let me ask you. Do you know how to get several inches of 'level' tip movement out of a complete fixed elbow stroke? If so please explain it to me & we can put this puppy to bed.
Everyone wants to divert from the topic in question with all kinds of other 'facts' but no one wants to give a bio-mechanical explanation to support randyG's assertion.
I just deleted the rest of my reply because I realized that trying to make you see it is extremely unlikely & it would probably only make matters worse.
Well I've asked you some question so I guess either 1 or 2 in your post applies, but I'll leave it to you & others to decide which one.
You know it's really rather funny to me that you suggest that I'm trolling my own thread when it was not me that brought up the subject. No offense but you sound like someone else.
Have a good evening Jon,