Patrick Johnson said:
The risk of immediately losing the game isn't a requirement for taking an intentional foul.
Requirements? Immediate loss? What? An intentional foul is calculated risk intended to preserve a good position or defend a precarious one. It's not a substitute for a good shot, nor is it appropriate everywhere and anytime - especially when other options have better (or at least as good) likelihood of success. This is so despite the fact you COULD take the foul.
I've seen what you suggest happen quite a bit. Someone saw or heard of Efren (of someone else) taking an intentional foul, so they want to show they are skilled enough to try it. Most times it's just a terrible shot with no justification (like the shot you suggest here). But they think they've shown a new level of play by taking the foul. Please. Some people are taking it to the extreme and shooting intentional fouls every game, or every other game. Put another way, just because it can be done, doesn't mean it should be your FIRST CHOICE. I honestly believe that there is NO WAY Cliff, John, Jose, Billy, Efren, etc would be taking a foul from here.
IMO, in the layout presented, taking an intentional foul by punting the cue ball to the bottom rail
is not increasing your chances of winning. You are losing a point when your opponent only has 1 ball he could score. And even if you put the cue ball in the jaws, you are going to be stuck to the 7 ball the next shot anyway.
You might choose losing one ball rather than giving up two or three to your opponent,
What 2 or 3 balls are you seeing that are an immediate threat here? I must be missing something.
or you might choose to trap your opponent in a way that's worse for him than the immediate loss of a ball is for you. Etc.
Taking a foul and putting the cue ball on the bottom rail is NOT trapping your opponent, nor does it make it worse for him. At BEST you are just surviving, but not for long. That is, if your opponent pushed the intentional foul back to the same (or close to the same spot) what would you do? Take another foul to the same spot and be on 2 fouls?
If your only two choices here were to take an intentional foul or give up the 8 ball, which would you choose?
Clearly, those aren't your only two choices here.
-td