A Point to Ponder
Cowboy,may I offer a few points to ponder,as your statement is a question that merits a serious answer. There are a large number of leagues as you state above. They are Independent of each other,yet they may "sanction" their league with a National Organization to participate at a higher level than just locally. This is a huge benefit to the player(s) that wishes to play more competitively. Whatever local awards the league has for players who would never go beyond local is up to the leadership of that league. Yes,sometimes competition for players can be fierce,and I admit,a little ugly between league operators. Having a singular authority for Amateur Pool would help in these matters. In the past,the Trade Association known as the Billiard Congress of America was "Unofficially" such a place. Any League Operator from any organization could call and get a non biased answer in regards to all questions posed by that league. Having no power to "enforce" decisions at the local level always left the responsibility to those leagues involved. In order for any of the leagues you mentioned in your area,all of them would have to recognize an organization that they would Trust to be as fair and impartial to Large Leagues like VNEA,APA,BCAPL just as it would be to Smaller Leagues like the Arizona Pool League,and any of your other independent leagues. Will they have that Trust? Since the BCA decided their trade mission was the focus of their existence,players have a void to fill. Also,the Men's Professional Pool Players are in the midst of crisis because they can't agree on a singular organization. Keep the faith though,because there may be hope on the horizon. Good Question.
One of the things IMHO that is very wrong with Pool is there are TOO MANY, Pool Organization. Example is in Phoenix Arizona, where have at last count from the latest issue of the local Pool rag, not less than EIGHT LEAGUE Organizations. BCA, TAP, ACS, APA, UPA, Arizona Pool League, TAP, and VNEA that are list in the rag. All of there league operators are each trying to attract players to their leagues. Think Pool IMHO would work better if it was all under one governing organization.
Cowboy,may I offer a few points to ponder,as your statement is a question that merits a serious answer. There are a large number of leagues as you state above. They are Independent of each other,yet they may "sanction" their league with a National Organization to participate at a higher level than just locally. This is a huge benefit to the player(s) that wishes to play more competitively. Whatever local awards the league has for players who would never go beyond local is up to the leadership of that league. Yes,sometimes competition for players can be fierce,and I admit,a little ugly between league operators. Having a singular authority for Amateur Pool would help in these matters. In the past,the Trade Association known as the Billiard Congress of America was "Unofficially" such a place. Any League Operator from any organization could call and get a non biased answer in regards to all questions posed by that league. Having no power to "enforce" decisions at the local level always left the responsibility to those leagues involved. In order for any of the leagues you mentioned in your area,all of them would have to recognize an organization that they would Trust to be as fair and impartial to Large Leagues like VNEA,APA,BCAPL just as it would be to Smaller Leagues like the Arizona Pool League,and any of your other independent leagues. Will they have that Trust? Since the BCA decided their trade mission was the focus of their existence,players have a void to fill. Also,the Men's Professional Pool Players are in the midst of crisis because they can't agree on a singular organization. Keep the faith though,because there may be hope on the horizon. Good Question.