Photography is a skilled trade, one that requires knowledge, practice, and talent. I fully understand all the functions of the camera, and considerations that need to be made before taking a picture....and yet I still have enough respect to know that I am not a professional photographer. It's sort of like pool. Just because you know tangent lines, english, and pattern play, doesn't mean you can compete with the pros.
Like any skilled trade, a good photographer deserves respect. So many people think they can just pick up a camera and shoot amazing photos, just as many people look at my movies and think they could have produced them themselves. This is clearly not the case, for numerous reasons:
1) An amateur is untrained, and is oblivious to what makes for a quality photograph. They lack the knowledge to spot the mistakes in their own pictures, while anyone with a trained eye could easily pick them apart.
2) A good photographer has something that the rest of us lack: opportunity. They're already at the pro events. They have access to key figures and situations that I am personally unable to photograph.
3) Equipment. A good camera setup is at least $4k. Most amateurs lack proper equipment. Good equipment doesn't make for a great picture, but it certainly helps.
Now I don't mean to slam your post or anything. I realize that your intent was purely positive and I thank you for that, however I really think more credit needs to be given to anyone who specializes in anything. Photography is just one example.
On a second note, thank you everyone for your contributions to this thread. You've supplied me with plenty of good photographers whom I'll certainly look into over the remainder of the week. :thumbup:
when i was in the publishing I had at least $20,000 in camera bodies and lenses, I couldnt take a decent picture to save my life. It aint the camera, its the photographer,