TheThaiger
Banned
So, who's confirming a definite interest then?
1. CJ
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1. CJ
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Yeah, I noticed most of the top golf instructors were HOF Golfers. Wait a minute, now that I think about it, I can't name a single famous instructor that even played on the PGA Tour.
Once again, I firmly believe the vast majority of the professionals in any sport are Savants. You can't teach what they have since God gave it to them. Pretty hard for them to relate to Joe Sixpack and attempt to teach them at the level that is needed to be effective.
I think (not sure) there may be a notable exception. Perhaps a rising star who isn't that far from being ready to play professionally may benefit more from some teaching from the right professional.
To me, it would be more interesting to have a 'teaching contest'.
All teachers start with 4 APA 2's and have a month to train them....
...then you have a round robin tournament and see who's pupil wins.
A great teacher doesn't necessarily have to be a great player....
..I knew a golf teacher that I could give two aside to...but touring
pros came to see him, not me.
However, if you want a 'great player that teaches' in the mix......
...I present you Alex Pagulayan.....
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...brAAd-Zz5CQHfDthQ&sig2=LoESlakv1LnhWibd96jfZQ
I don't believe there was anything that could be called a "pro tour" when Jerry played. I'm not ignoring the fact that the man could play very well, I'm just saying that Mark Wilson "qualified" himself as a pro by playing competitively on the PBT, and Fran Crimi "qualified" herself as a pro by playing competitively in the WPBA. Both of these people went on to "qualify" themselves as instructors by becoming accredited by the BCA (now the PBIA). To my knowledge, they are the only two people to distinguish themselves in that exact manner.
I really don't see the sense in threads of this type. Even if it could somehow be proven that a certain player instructs better that others, or that a certain instructor plays better than others, what is the purpose for wanting to prove it?
Roger
Your posts are the most thought out and logical on this thread.
I tried to get a tournament going among instructors in Florida and got no response. I wasn't trying to prove anything, I just thought it would be fun and perhaps some publicity for all of us.
Many of the active instructors are my age (70) and older, and are simply past our "prime". For me, I was never a "professional" player, though I came out $$ ahead playing pool every year from 1967 to 1987 and 1990 to 2008. (brief retirement '87-'90)
While my knowledge of the game continues to increase, my physical skills have not. Health problems and economic woes have not helped.
Any kind of national or even state "Instructor Championships" would almost have to have a "senior" and "super senior" division to be fair.
How good an instructor plays is hardly as important as how well he or she teaches. And no "one size fits all"! Some folks think I'm a great instructor and others do not. That's OK...
"what is the purpose for trying to prove it?" Human ego, the curse of our species...
Your posts are the most thought out and logical on this thread.
I tried to get a tournament going among instructors in Florida and got no response. I wasn't trying to prove anything, I just thought it would be fun and perhaps some publicity for all of us.
Many of the active instructors are my age (70) and older, and are simply past our "prime". For me, I was never a "professional" player, though I came out $$ ahead playing pool every year from 1967 to 1987 and 1990 to 2008. (brief retirement '87-'90)
While my knowledge of the game continues to increase, my physical skills have not. Health problems and economic woes have not helped.
Any kind of national or even state "Instructor Championships" would almost have to have a "senior" and "super senior" division to be fair.
How good an instructor plays is hardly as important as how well he or she teaches. And no "one size fits all"! Some folks think I'm a great instructor and others do not. That's OK...
"what is the purpose for trying to prove it?" Human ego, the curse of our species...
I really don't see the sense in threads of this type. Even if it could somehow be proven that a certain player instructs better that others, or that a certain instructor plays better than others, what is the purpose for wanting to prove it?
Roger
Isn't Fong Pang Chao a instructor. I thought he taught Yang how to play.
Because the OP asked who is the best playing instructor, not who is the best instructor. Nobody is saying that the best player is the best instructor, just they are the best player. I have no problem with it, and I'm not donating $2K to the cause but would pay to watch it.
You make it $200, and you might get evey instructor in the country to play, and then we have a real tourney, with live stream, and then I'm in......I'm still donating, but it be fun to meet the other instructors and win a few matches before I meet CJ or Geno or Max, or Stan , etc.![]()
It's called fun, a little bragging rights, some students get to see some instructors in the box. And ego's is what built many great businesses, or allowed some to invent many things that have helped mankind. Or just strive to play the best you can on league night.....
As I recall, Fong Pang Chao went to Mainland China to instruct their players.
Isn't Fong Pang Chao a instructor. I thought he taught Yang how to play.
Thorsten Hohmann, IPAT Instructor and multiple world title holder.
Chao is now back in Taiwan teaching. Lee Kwen Fang also teaches who was also once a world beater. Both of them are teaching in my hometown in Kaohsiung at about a rate of 40 an hr