We can ***** about this forever, but all the *****ing in the world isn't gonna fix the problems.
You've "spoken with him". Exactly what I said, you have no firsthand knowledge. You have his version of things and nothing else. The things you repeat are things you've heard. It's gossip. It's hearsay. It's BS.
I'm not God and I never claimed to be. Just someone who is sick and tired of people like you spouting off that you know what's best or what's wrong with the WPBA or what mistakes they made in the past. It's so pointless and unproductive. If you are such a supporter and want to help them, then get run for the Board or volunteer for a committee and actually try to improve things instead of just running your mouth on a forum.
And yeah, I'm anonymous. Like that's a huge crime. Whoa look out, someone is posting under an assumed name on a message board. Big news!
Scott,
Just one question. What was your purpose in writing your first post on this thread? I can't find any way that it was helpful to the WPBA that you have supported for so long. Did I miss your point?
My thoughts are with the players, most times people just want to do their thing and leave the management/organizational planning/marketing to other people. I hope the players identify this event as an opportunity to make right what they think other people should've done.
The survival of most organizations depends on investors and partners, I just wonder if any of the players while they were touring were developing contacts because these are the times that it helps to have some.
Cross-promotional events are the simplest solution but are the players and the events do not seem ready for being sold to other people. The recent changes about tournament formats would not indicate that the players and the organization are operating at a comfortable level, if I were an investor it doesn't seem like a good time to invest.
I understand that something like the IPT which promotes and shows off puts on a good show for investors, but that is only needed if there is no product. The WPBA has a product but it could use some polishing.
It looks like the next few years could be the make or break years.
You are bringing up a great point. Compare the WPBA tour with another tour, one known as NASCAR. When the race is coming to town, the teams and drivers are available for all kinds of promotional events in the days just prior to race day. Race cars are seen in front of stores like Home Depot, Lowes, and many other sponsors. Drivers work hard between races to PROMOTE their sponsors. And those public apperances help generate interest in the race, and bring out spectators. And they do that over 30 times a year. How often do we hear of pro pool players doing much more than showing up for the tournaments?
If the players want the tour to be a full time job, they have to know that they need to work full time at promoting it.
Steve
This is an unbelievable press release by the WPBA. So what do you think about it?
WPBA
WPBA seeks partners/investors
The Women’s Professional Billiard Association is seeking Letters of Interest from prospective investors and/or partners who are interested in playing a key role in the future of the WPBA.
The WPBA was the first association organized by women and for women pool players, providing a venue for women to compete professionally. The WPBA has evolved over time. The level of play has reached new heights, and in the past 10 years players from around the world have sought and earned coveted spots on the WPBA tour.
Perhaps most important in the evolution of the WPBA is the TV coverage on ESPN of women’s 9-Ball. While the viewership is modest, the WPBA has retained a loyal audience over the years, despite the competing coverage of major golf, football and other sporting events.
For the past few years, the WPBA has been run by a volunteer board of directors, with minimal paid staff assistance and resources. To maintain the integrity of the tour, the WPBA feels that it would be in the best interest of the organization to find partners and/or investors who have an interest in promoting women’s billiards, and the resources to provide a high level of professional competition in a professional environment.
We seek Letters of Interest from qualified persons or entities only. At a minimum, respondents should provide the information requested on the attached form, along with a cover letter. Respondents may include any other information that would help the Board understand the respondent’s experience and resources. Only those respondents with substantial qualifications will be provided a proposal package and invited to meet with the WPBA Board of Directors.
Due date. Please e-mail responses in PDF format to: info1@wpba.com. Letters are due no later than 5:00 p.m. EST, Friday, Jan. 14, 2011.
WPBA Letter of Interest
(It is not necessary to use this form, as long as all relevant information is included with your response.)
Name of entity/person Name of person authorized to submit response
Address Contact information for authorized person
Phone E-mail
Please provide detailed information regarding you/your entity’s experience in the billiard industry, other sports or related industries.
Please provide names and backgrounds of the key people in your organization, who would be attending the informational meeting with the WPBA Board of Directors,
Authorized signature Date
By Press Release - 2010-12-21
You are bringing up a great point. Compare the WPBA tour with another tour, one known as NASCAR. When the race is coming to town, the teams and drivers are available for all kinds of promotional events in the days just prior to race day. Race cars are seen in front of stores like Home Depot, Lowes, and many other sponsors. Drivers work hard between races to PROMOTE their sponsors. And those public apperances help generate interest in the race, and bring out spectators. And they do that over 30 times a year. How often do we hear of pro pool players doing much more than showing up for the tournaments?
If the players want the tour to be a full time job, they have to know that they need to work full time at promoting it.
Steve
My opinion?
This is pathetic. It is a joke. It is not the way it is done.
The WPBA needs to put together a compelling package and individually pitch it to potential sponsors and convince them why they would be stupid not to sponsor them. Doing it right is hard, expensive work. Whoever is driving the bus on this should be shot.
(Not that I have any particular strong reaction to this
Lou Figueroa
My opinion?
This is pathetic. It is a joke. It is not the way it is done.
The WPBA needs to put together a compelling package and individually pitch it to potential sponsors and convince them why they would be stupid not to sponsor them. Doing it right is hard, expensive work. Whoever is driving the bus on this should be shot.
(Not that I have any particular strong reaction to this
Lou Figueroa
Investors?
Has anyone drawn up a business plan to show these would be investors how they will get a "ROI" (Return on their Investment). Tours are expensive as any promoter will tell you. I sometimes wonder if it's even possible for "investors" to make any money on promoting pool tournaments and tours.
If a tournament were live-streamed on the internet, how many UVs would watch it and the advertisements that would also be on the page to pay for it? If every APA player watched it that's still only 300,000 UVs (unique visitors). A large sponsor would likely want millions of UVs for their investment. I am not convinced that many people would turn out to watch the finals of the U.S. Open. I haven't seen the Nielsen data for shows like ESPN's Trick Shot Magic but I imagine they have a much higher number of viewers than the regular pool tournaments we see on TV.
I fully understand the pool and billiards is a long tail business plan at best in the short to mid term but ROI is something I think goes forgotten whenever the plea for an "investor" is made.
Anyone have any thoughts on how the investors (particularly those outside of the pool industry) get their money back?
Some investors don't like a return on their investment. Look at all the scams that had "investors" who got a good show and no return on investment.
I invest in television and I don't expect to make a profit by owning one. Some things are just entertainment purposes.
A bunch of guys run a free newspaper at a loss because they just like putting something different out there.
I was talking about corporate investors. I wouldn't call buying a TV making an investment in the TV. You of course are free to call it anything you like.
Canned Dog Food may be considered by some to be Filet Mignon.
Back when I was in elementary school we used to donate a dollar and get a little button that said "Send a mouse to college" I still have the button. Did I invest in that mouse's education? It probably was used in some lab experiment and likely died from the experience. Maybe we should have an adopt a player program in the schools. If every school age child contributed a dollar then we'd have enough money for a tour! (note obvious sarcasm)
I am sure you can find another IPT promoter, there are plenty of people that know get rich quick schemes and have the money and clothes to back it up.
Why not consider the practical route and see where it leads? ( I am always thinking about fast track ways to retirement without indictment. But time spent learning the system takes time.)
I hope the WPBA succeeds. But your ideas are not practical or realistic from a business perspective.
I just like hearing what people will say in the argument against. Focus groups got too expensive for me, this is cheaper.
The WPBA is succeeding it seems people here just disagree with how they succeed and what they should be succeeding at. (This is great research data BTW.)
You are right from a business perspective the people begging should be the ones that need the players to show up not the management that arranges finances. The economy is tight and some people are taking on multiple roles.
I just had to think about it for awhile before your sense was made clear to me.
It isn't like some promoter would broadcast a NY girls phone message about
not showing up. But then again promoters are risk takers. I am sure as long as the players do what the promoters need everything will go smoothly. That policy hasn't changed. The WPBA has a new one and it is public disclosure. That isn't a trend that will go over well with competitors.
Did you have any thoughts about their public statement? I try to get the thread back on course of the OP after this quick discussion. It is a bump in the road quick exchanges like this but part of the journey.