Funny pic/gif thread...
- By Inferno
- Main Forum
- 75011 Replies
That's not how the red hats think of Antarctica. They think it's a giant wall that holds all the oceans in.
That's not how the red hats think of Antarctica. They think it's a giant wall that holds all the oceans in.
LOL.... overthinking. Like watching a golfer stop after ball contact occurrs.I don't know what this device is, but I wish I'd had one when I was learning.View attachment 897601View attachment 897604
If I'm an opponent in this situation, I will always stop play and call for a ref.Let me revise my statement. If I were FSR, I would have made sure I was able to see the shot because it was obvious it was going to be a close call. And when I saw how the CB reacted, indicating an obvious foul, I would have challenged the non-call.
That is unfortunate, and I know it is asking a lot for the ref to be assertive in a situation like this, but that is their job (to make sure the right call is made, despite other circumstances).
This was tried multiple times, at least one that I've seen 10 years ago was trying to use a special tip with a microscopic surface similar to that of gecko feet. It didn't work....we'll probably have new tech that does not requires chalk...
Gorina T2000 and Basalt stretch a bit more than Simonis 860. Championship Tour Edition stretches MUCH more than Simonis 860, and is quite a bit faster. ProForm505 and Andy Premier are quite considerably faster than Simonis 860, though they stretch less.Ok, I have installed Simonis, CPBA and few cheap cloths on my own tables.I have never installed anything faster than 860. I know that on a 9ft table with Simonis the stretch is around 1.8. I just installed Gorina Tournament 2000 and what I came up with as the stretch index of 2.7. basically 3.5" stretch. Does this sound right? Does fast cloth have that much more stretch? What is it for 760 cloth?
No, success is not relative, name 1 person who can travel to tournaments, pay entry and expenses and live on 18,000.
You are all delusional
People ignoring sponsorship, lessons, and other side gig revenue streams are being willfully obtuse about the financials of pro pool, but that’s par for the course for many posters here.Woodward won $95k in tournaments last year. Thorpe was about $70k. With sponsors and side gigs, that can work. There are three other Americans over $50k for 2025.
Woodward won $95k in tournaments last year. Thorpe was about $70k. With sponsors and side gigs, that can work. There are three other Americans over $50k for 2025.Yep, full time job is the answer. Other than Shane and Fedor nobody in the US can live by being a touring pro.
No message except elbow drop or not compared to any one of those dives. Learn a good method and stick to it. It shouldn't ever be a struggle.The only parallel I see is I play in a Dive sometimes. I get the message.
Yes, but they are not learning from their mistakes., so I'm a lot more concerned about it than you.
By every reckoning, the Capito foul that (possibly) cost Lechner a spot in the 2025 Hanoi Open semifinals should have given rise to remedial action by WPA to train referees. The most incredible thing about the Capito call at the Hanoi Open, among the worst calls I've seen in my fifty years around pro pool, is that AFTER a video review by the head referee, the incredibly embarrassing call was upheld by the head referee. The message was clear. Referees lack some of the knowledge to do their job as well as they might.
Similarly, when WAXGATE happened at the 2025 WPC, it was obvious to numerous players that some were doctoring the cue ball, not only observing it, but because the cue ball was, far too often, "behaving" in a manner deemed near impossible and irreconcilable with all their experience. I firmly believe that the referees noticed it, too but, if so, they opted not to enforce a rule that WPA noted, in a press release that same week, fell under "unsportsmanslike conduct" rules long on the books. If the refs did not notice it, there is, once again, a problem with referees not showing up to matches with the right knowledge.
I'm fine with referees making some errors in observation or judgment from time to time, for they are only human. They will fail to notice or even misjudge the occasional shirt foul, double hit. or ever-so-slight movement of an object ball, and that's unfortunate but to be expected.
I'm not fine with referees showing up to work without the knowledge needed to do their jobs effectively and, in my opinion, for the third time in the past year, referee ineffectiveness reared its ugly head in major championship play.
Last dive alsoThe one at 2:09 is stunning. It's someone threw a small rock into the water.
Yapp knew it was a foul. So for me, he is just a piece of shit.
Not a way to win WC.
Im a huge fan too, especially in J Showmans handsAlways been a fan of the 60s cues with colored rings. The thick 1/2 rings will be used in my next build.