Has anyone seen cue work like this before?
- By mr3cushion
- Main Forum
- 47 Replies
The 'More' pieces/inlays/parts the 'More' can go wrong!
JMPO!
JMPO!
Oh boy!!!! I am drooling. That SR 71 was the ultimate. It was originally designated YF-12A. The Y F for experimental fighter.
Being brutally honest, the quality level of the inlay work is more then acceptable for furniture, but not even close to the level needed to get any kind of decent money for a cue.
With respect, why wouldn’t they need an aiming system? Relying solely on the “visible edge” may not be the most effective aiming reference for them individually.Place an object ball on the spot. Place the cue ball in the jaws of a pocket in the kitchen. Now move the cue ball forward directly toward the spotted object ball until you can get a comfortable bridge.
This is a half ball shot from maximum distance for such. You know what this is and where to aim it. You know the exact aiming spot is the edge of the object ball. We all know this. The one cut shot no one ever argues isn't 100% objective.
Shoot it 25 times. How many times did you miss? Be honest at least with yourself. Did you miss because you didn't know where to aim? Of course you didn't. You missed because you failed to deliver the cue ball to where you intended it to travel.
If you missed more than 2-3 times you don't need an aiming system, you need practice on your fundamentals. A lot of practice.
When you almost never miss this shot you may be ready to talk about aiming systems. Until then you're wasting your time looking for the magic star dust.
Good luck!
Coincidence. Samples as in options. Pull out the chop suey cues - like the old Scmelke options in the catalog.you mean "sampaio' i think. i agree. the sampaio's were more carved and not as inlaid.