Shaw vs. Doung Quoc Hoang

Someone made a video on FB of all of the first day's breaks, showing only the breaks. Doung was clearly WAY slower than Shaw in all of the breaks. It wasn't even close. I can't tell if the ref called any of them illegal. The video creater had his own commentary of what was ok, and what was bad, and it was covering up if the ref took any action.

With that background info, I could def see Shaw going nuts if HE was called for a slow break on Day 2, especially if Doung wasn't called for any on Day 1.

ps, what was the final count?

How good was George Breedlove

I left the game around the time he started and was curious.

Accu-Stats has released two of his matches recently, both playing Sigel.

He won both and played incredible.

He looked great and played the game like many of us think it should be played.
I would like to add that for a player of his caliber his safety game seemed quite suspect to me, which might have been a factor in him never winning a major title.

For sure it wasn't his offense.

Cue pivot SOTW alternative?

I take a little of it back. The method is useful for kicks off the side rails. I don't think he has the length quite right. His method should put the bumper of his cue at the rolling-ball mirror image of the pocket. As a check, the bumper needs to be in line with the end rail. He doesn't check that, and the bumper will be less and less in line as the balls move away from the end rail.

His method of the end-rail kicks is off because the bumper is no where near in-line with the side rails, and the ball will go short for the shots he demonstrated. I guess you could argue they won't be off by much, but I don't like systems with built-in errors. In a lot of rooms, you can't get the bumper to the correct position because of walls and tables. I'm not sure, but maybe the long-way kick could be fixed by rotating half way and then parallel shifting.

The basic idea (corrected): Put the bumper at the location of the spot on the wall, then pivot around that spot to the cue ball to get the line of the shot, and note where on the rail you have to aim.

The basic problem: he doesn't put the bumper at the spot on the wall most of the time.
That was pretty much what I got and think the video intended....since the cue is approx. the width of the table it somewhat works...(notice however both shots he actually hits rail first not directly into the ball)

I much prefer the mini mirror method (some call it the X method I think).....much better than the full mirror....... as you also mentioned...many rooms there is not enough room to make that extended cue manuvior he demonstrates.......The mini mirror you never leave the bed of the table for the visualization.

It is convenient once you have that three rail "wall spot" reference in a home room

of course no matter what method you use...it only gets you close enough to adjust for conditions.

The new U S. pro pool tour

Lots of the blame can be placed on the feet of the Bowlero company. It has taken many bowling alleys and converted them to family centers were bowling is not the focus. That move alone has helped kill off the next generation of pro bowlers.

As for the original post, this isn't anything new. Zuglan's northeast tour has been going strong for what seems like decades now and the top players make some good money playing there. I believe first place is usually around $1200.

The only thing that would turn off so many people about these tours is the fact that many are handicapped. I truly believe there is a place for tours without the need of handicapping. But it would take someone with some deep pockets and running in the red for a while before something like that takes off.
I bowled Collegiate at NDSU. My opinion of Bowlero is just a string of 4 letter words. I've watched them buy out and ruin great houses.
They've totally destroyed the game and the will of a small amount of houses and organizers are hanging on by their fingernails.

The new U S. pro pool tour

there are ways to make the purse pool huge. but it needs some creative mind or minds to do it. the major hurdle which is a monster to overcome to get some outside money in with the current batch of pro players.

they are a bunch of stoic robots, that no one that isnt a total pool nut will stand to watch for more than a short time.
they need a handler to change all that and control it so the crowd is really partners of the game. and more.

and arrange to have more things going on than just a race of 9 ball. seen one you've seen them all.

many ways to get big numbers watching and interested in participating for bigger dollars. only bigger dollars brings more people. i thought for a short time a ways back, of making the worlds biggest payouts and participation but realized i would have to fight all the nay sayers, and the work needed.
not worth it for most anyone.

pool people think too small. there are still many talking about 1000 or two, dollar prize payouts. that isnt even the size of a decent horse bet on a big race. or a hand in an action medium stakes poker pot. or any gamblers bet on a football game.

i hope jay comes up with something. he can do it.

Filter

Back
Top