No he did not, and it is pretty clear from all the videos that he did not. We never see the shaft touch the nine ball, and we have zero reason to believe it did either, especially considering all the evidence against it. If you want to keep saying it did, show me the frame where the shaft is hitting the nine. Until then that is a silly belief, and that imaginary nine ball movement you are without evidence attributing to being a foul was just another one of the 641 other nine ball optical illusions that we can very clearly see are happening at the time.
It is you who are twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to avoid the obvious. There was no foul, and physics and the video evidence very strongly support that there was no foul. I knew you wouldn't answer my two questions because you can't, and in the attempt to you would have ultimately had to admit that the evidence just doesn't support a foul, and in fact pretty much says that a foul could not have occurred.
But if you or anyone else that thinks that one of the 642 optical illusion nine ball movements was caused by a foul then you will be able to explain how you can tell that one was caused by a foul when it looks just like the other 641 imaginary nine ball movements that we know for sure are happening all around it due to the video issues. You will also be able to explain how, after being hit by the shaft, the nine ball could sit there absolutely perfectly still and take a nap for a while before it decided to wake up at some later time and finally move in reaction to being hit. Both of those two things would have had to have happened in order for there to have been a foul, so explain how it would makes sense that they could have happened.
Tough to explain the impossible, isn't it? I'll be waiting.
