I was unimpressed with Rogan. He voiced his unfiltered opinions, yes, but he added very little of substance or entertainment value. And "very little" might be overstating it.
If he wasn't as well known as he is, people would be laughing the amateur pool commentator hack out of the booth.
Strange comment. In essence you are saying “if he was an unknown amateur pool enthusiast, it would be weird to have him in the booth at the US Open finals”.
I mean, sure. But he’s not unknown and the point is he’s not there for you, or me, on anyone who would be watching the WNT broadcast anyway.
He’s there for people watching on ESPN2, and people who might see clips on YouTube etc, who will say “I know Joe Rogan. He loves this sport. Maybe I will watch some”.
I also suspect he will talk about the US Open on his podcast that gets millions of viewers.
It’s like pool players who would complain that they prefer Grady and Billy on Accu-Stats telling road stories or going into minutiae on the game rather than the way WNT presents the game. I love them too, but it’s just different audiences and viewers on Sky Sports or ESPN need different things.