Team Names Not Allowed
- By straightline
- Main Forum
- 50 Replies
I recall a HawEye post in one of the cue threads. FnR I recall him saying he was going to Finland(?) to visit family and or enter a major in China and that's it.
Efren wasn't giving the 8-ball to Buddy..guaranteed...I was in LA and used to head down to Hardtimes, Bellflower, in its hey day. This was when all top pros were hanging around including the Efren, Parica, McCready, Tang, Janette, etc were all there. Everyone was matching up with everyone. Everyone stayed away from Mark Tad. I remember just watching him on the back table all by himself practicing for hours. I think at the time, Efren was giving away the 8 to anyone except Mark. That speaks for itself.
I feel like he was only around for 2 years… shooting at that high speed. I know nothing about how he got there… other than his ability to focus.
Ok, now we ''know'' how Tadd was able to produce his run ;-)
But how do you know all this?? Are you a pool historian or did AI assist..?
An esteemed member reveiled the field of the LA open, Tadd beat everybody ''but'' the best who were competing at the Desert Dust-Off.I would agree that Mark Tadd's elite status shined during a very brief window of time but it did shine bright. Look up the LA OPEN I believe it was. Mark beat the best in the world in multiple disciplines. I just don't think his heart was in tournament play. I would ask that you search the forum for threads on Mark Tadd, and then argue that Mark definitely earned his own legendary status within our billiards history since so many people love to share stories of his mythic exploits.
You can have timekeepers on each table, as mentioned above for the first Atlantic City US Open, or you can use chess clocks. You could probably also do it with a camera and the right software -- where are the balls, when do they stop moving, when do they start moving again?How do you enforce a shot clock on dozens of tables?
You are correct, where is he? Troubling -- he is as close to a regular as we have. OffSpeaking of absent, where's flakeandrun?
Dr Dave did a test of a few different chalks. One was the Taom. And as I recall there was no difference in the tip position and miscue between the various chalks. In my personal experience, and I've been using Taom exclusively for about 2 years, never noticed any issue with miscues.
Man, thank you so much for going through the trouble of getting that infoI checked Billiards Digest and Pool & Billiard Magazine. The only matches they mentioned that included Mark Tadd were the following (Tadd's score first in each match):
One-PocketSteve Cook 2-3 (hot seat)Dave Matlock 3-1 (semifinal)Steve Cook 1-3 (final)BankLou Butera 5-1 (hot seat)Donnie Anderson 5-2 (final)9-BallBill Incardona 11-8 (6th round)Roger Griffis 11-3 (hot seat)Dennis Hatch 11-5 (final)For an idea of the field strength, here (from P&B Magazine) are the top 12 finishers in each event:
One-Pocket1 Steve Cook2 Mark Tadd3 Dave Matlock4 Jose Parica5/6 Jeremiah Johnson, Dan Diliberto7/8 James Brown, Cecil Tugwell9/12 Jimmy Fusco, Wade Crane, Cole Dickson, Jimmy ReidBank1 Mark Tadd2 Donnie Anderson3 Lou Butera4 Bill Incardona5/6 Tony Fargo, Jose Parica7/8 Gary Spaeth, Shannon Daulton9/12 James Brown, Larry Humphreys, Tom Hardwood, Morro Paez9-Ball1 Mark Tadd2 Dennis Hatch3 Roger Griffis4 Mike Defino5/6 Bill Incardona, Keith McCready7/8 Rodney Morris, Jose Parica9/12 Grady Mathews, Bill Cress, Tony Fargo, Bill MeachemTadd's winnings were $26,000 in total -- $5,000 for 2nd in One-Pocket, $6,000 for 1st in Bank, $10,000 for 1st in 9-Ball, and $5,000 in the Grand Prix (all-around prize)