I did (not as sizable as one can imagine), as 200.00 for his win was out of this world and insane. Now, though, when he is trailing Kledio Kaci, this makes little sense. Oh wait, Kledio carries some of my dough as well!I just saw this on page 1 and have to wonder if anyone laid a sizable wager on Ameer.
Yeah, it's a bit confusing. I think when a player has no "starter rating" and zero robustness, a random number might appear as their "preliminary rating". In your case, it was 498, and you thought that was the "starter rating".Gotcha!!!!!
The screenshot I posted, it did have 498 where it is now 442 but I see when I search as instructed, indeed a starter rating is 0. It is a little counterintuitive but thanks for the clarification!
Gotcha!!!!!Look up your name in the search, as if you were looking up another player. When it pops up, it will have the "Starter Rating" row with a number.
IDK if you can see it anywhere else. Once you get to 200 robustness, it disappears entirely (the field is not even there).