Myth or real - Stroke smoothness as a requisite for certain shots
- By DeeDeeCues
- Main Forum
- 133 Replies
Yeah I agree with all of this. Part of the problem is what the word "stroke" really means.
Does it mean the final instant of contact?
Does it mean the intended motion profile of the cue movement?
Does it include someone's personal fundamental setup and stance?
Is it the entire mental approach to the table, including endurance?
I've heard it as all of those things, and I originally used it as the first definition I listed.
It is somewhere in the middle of all that above.
What I am trying to express, and have so far been failing at with poor articulation, is that it is unnecessary to deliberately add additional axial and radial movement to your final stroke with the expectation that it will cause augmented manipulation of the cue ball, rather than initially aiming for the location on the cue ball that resulted from the additional movements at the time of contact.
Whew.
Take this and apply whatever definition of stroke you want and I'll be happy with that.
Stroke already has a dictionary definition. I'm this context it is most applicable to either the motion of the cue or the motion of the player.
I believe it is most widely accepted that when players talk about their stroke they are talking about their body mechanics.