straightline: "Can you provide the logic behind this?"

It's all about "throw" - if you understand it our "views" are simple cause and effect.

A refresher:
When the CB's surface rubs across the OB's surface, either from the CB hitting the OB at an angle ("cut-induced" throw) or from CB side spin ("spin-induced" throw), or a combination of the two, it creates rubbing friction that "throws" the OB a little off the CB-OB line-of-centers (more on straighter and slower shots). Throw must be compensated for while aiming, either consciously or "by feel".

"Cut-induced" throw can be easily seen by freezing two OBs together against a rail and shooting that "dead" corner pocket combo straight into either OB from an angle (as if it's the "ghost ball"). You'll see that maximum throw does indeed happen at about a 30° (half ball) cut as shown by Bob's chart above.

pj
chgo
I just love "our views."

I don't need or want your explanations, advice or opinions.

Hell will freeze over first.

A Catalog of Common SCRATCHES, and How to Avoid Them

Obviously not. That’s why a high tip was used. Again, all questions you have asked in this thread are answered with clear explanations and demonstrations in the video linked above.
What if I or anyone else for that matter do not want to be directed towards a video for an answer? Is that all you can provide is a link to your videos? How about just a straight answer?

I pretty much know all I need to based upon a few tidbits of info I have gained recently. Your use of high ball, calling it "natural." Your reply of "all different directions" to what should have been simple question to answer. How about "good action draw" what the hell is that? Either you are purposefully deflecting or just don't know.

I don't & just can't agree with your methods. There is no way in hell I would teach my students in this manner. It is my opinion that you shouldn't either. "To each their own" I guess applies here.

Who is the best player of the last 40 years not to win a major event?

Jeff Carter won many regional events but never a major as far as I can remember. He frequently finished in the top four to six players but never quite got it over the goal line. He was a damn good money player too. He is the best one I can think of right now. There were several primarily money players from the Philippines who cut a path across America but rarely played in or won a major tournament. Andam, Lining and Manalo are three I remember. Luat came right after Efren and did play quite a few tournaments and his best finish was a second to Alex in one of them. Steve Knight came over from England in the late 1990's and best everyone he played (mostly up and down the East Coast) but may have played in only one or two major events. Tang Hoa won many local tourneys out west but his best finish in a major was second to Buddy Hall in 1998. Marcus Chamat was another damn good player who never quite got there, but for the cash he killed.
Here's the group that Might.... have the one you seek.

Attachments

  • IMG_20220310_102022.jpg
    IMG_20220310_102022.jpg
    109.1 KB · Views: 100

Salotto is a joke… part deux

I posted a few months ago about how salotto rejected my scores against someone that was a 657 and I’m a 586


Well guess what… I just beat a 760 Fargo in the international open

I guess he was dumping so that he can play in some 600 and under events

Hahahahahaha. Salotto is a joke.
This sounds like half the story. I am glad they questioned results. I had a similar experience and they contacted me. They let the results stand after hearing my take.

They have been very responsive to questions I have had and issues I have pointed out to them.

Filter

Back
Top