This Sunday at 10am (MST) Scott Frost will be Answering Questions Live

mlalum said:
Well if you're curious JAM i'll answer your question this one time.

Lenny is a friend of mine. He's young and he's a hot head but he's a real good kid. He just doesn't have a clue right now on what the right thing to do is. Plus he's in with a bad crowd. He's let what written on AZFORUMS (a problem he created ) dictate his team's strategy. He's made one bad strategic move after another and this one has the potential to be the worst. You win by being smart not by being driven by your temper. Lenny's team hasn't done one smart thing yet since Lenny posted originally.
Click to expand...


Lenny may be young...but he is NOT a hot head......I see Lenny all the time....He (beside me) may be one of the most mellow, courtious people I have ever met in the pool world....No arrogance at all....just a pure love for pool......er....one pocket.

Respectfully6....might I suggest you watch what kind of comments you make about someone.....That kind of stuff around here can lend itself to a bad reputation for that person....(or you when they find out it is not true).....;)
 
mlalum said:
Well if you're curious JAM i'll answer your question this one time.

Lenny is a friend of mine. He's young and he's a hot head but he's a real good kid. He just doesn't have a clue right now on what the right thing to do is. Plus he's in with a bad crowd. He's let what written on AZFORUMS (a problem he created ) dictate his team's strategy. He's made one bad strategic move after another and this one has the potential to be the worst. You win by being smart not by being driven by your temper. Lenny's team hasn't done one smart thing yet since Lenny posted originally.
Click to expand...

I can appreciate the fact that you want to protect your friend, due to friendship reasons.

That said, there has been a growing speculation about why Scott Frost has not presented his side. In fact, there is one school of thought that says he must be guilty since he has remained silent the entire month, month and a half, whatever the time period is since this all took place. This is why I think Fast Lenny is affording Scott the opportunity to say his piece. That's all, plain and simple.
 
BRKNRUN said:
Lenny may be young...but he is NOT a hot head......I see Lenny all the time....He (beside me) may be one of the most mellow, courtious people I have ever met in the pool world....No arrogance at all....just a pure love for pool......er....one pocket.

Respectfully6....might I suggest you watch what kind of comments you make about someone.....That kind of stuff around here can lend itself to a bad reputation for that person....(or you when they find out it is not true).....;)
Click to expand...

You're right he's not a hot head in the pool room. He's a great kid. But he is a hot head on the forums when defending his friends. And it gets him in trouble. Sorry you got the wrong impression Ken.

M
 
Dont Do It

watchez said:
Talking about this on a webcast, recorded, without an attorney present, is a bad idea for Scott.
Click to expand...

Fully agree with your post.

Scott should definitely not do this.. Nothing to gain at all.

Cant help him and can only hurt him

It sure isnt going to pressure the Viffer into anything..so what is really gained?

Have your day in court
 
JAM said:
I can appreciate the fact that you want to protect your friend, due to friendship reasons.

That said, there has been a growing speculation about why Scott Frost has not presented his side. In fact, there is one school of thought that says he must be guilty since he has remained silent the entire month, month and a half, whatever the time period is since this all took place. This is why I think Fast Lenny is affording Scott the opportunity to say his piece. That's all, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Nothing is plain and simple Jam. But that's what you and Lenny are thinking. You have to think past the plain and simple.

YOu want to put Scott Frost (who won't come off as a likeable guy on camera) on camera talking about gambling, armed robberies, stolen trucks, elicit payments, fifty thousand dollars, name some names, the full dark side of the pool culture and oh by the way get in on tape forever. Often well meaning politicians who are much better at being on camera ended up screwing themselves in deep because they say the wrong word... It's pointless to go on if you can't see how dangerous this is for Scott. I don't what else i can say about it. There's about 100 things that can go wrong and maybe one thing that can go right. Nobody would make that bet. If you're doing it because you want to convince the azforums who's right well that's about as dumb as it gets.
 
Laugh

BRKNRUN said:
Hmmm....I know this is the internet and all...but this looks like a bluff Dippy......You are (without saying it directly) saying that you don't want them to do this.....If you DID want them to do this you would not have tried to use backhanded defamation to try and get them to change there mind...........

You did not say "don't do it" but that comment sure speaks to that.


Interesting;)
Click to expand...

I dont think this is a bluff. I think he will be getting a big laugh out of it.

What can Scott really say that is different from what Billy and Lenny have already said? Maybe a couple of small points but that will be it..but we can wait and see.

I think Dippy's main point was Scott's character. That he attacked pretty hard and even used previous posts to try and back his points. I could definitely see Scott wanting to defend how he looks here but in order to do that he would have to address the character attacks--which he wont be able to do at all if he doesnt answer all the questions you would screen.

Scott needs to have him post up and play him--probably the only chance he has of getting any money out of him.
 
Since so much has transpired with words written by other parties involved in the conflict, I am not sure how it would hurt to have Scott provide his side of the story.

Thinking about it, though, I now have second thoughts, only because of the repercussions that Scott will get from the so-called forum court of justice. :(
 

Attachments

  • badgeringwitness2[1].gif
    badgeringwitness2[1].gif
    72.4 KB · Views: 416
For those concerned over legal ramifications for Scott over doing a live stream answering questions:

First, I am certainly not a lawyer but I do have some knowledge and common sense.

Here is a fact: The absolute defense to slander is truth. If you are not lying about someone then you are not commiting slander. Period!

If I were doing a public Q&A where I was providing answers about this epic tale, I would definitely confine my answers to only those that could have no legal consequences. This would include details of any alleged assault or attempted robbery.

One final consideration: It never hurts to consult with an attorney before making public comments that may open the door to either IRS scrutiny or possible criminal/civil charges.

Best,
Brian kc
 
Last edited:
Kickin' Chicken said:
For those concerned over legal ramifications for Scott over doing a live stream answering questions:

First, I am certainly not a lawyer but I do have some knowledge and common sense.

Here is a fact: The absolute defense to slander is truth. If you are not lying about someone then you are not commiting slander. Period!

If I were doing a public Q&A where I was providing answers about this epic tale, I would definitely confine my answers to only those that could have no legal consequences. This would include details of any alleged assault or attempted robbery.

One final consideration: It never hurts to consult with an attorney before making public comments that may open the door to either IRS scrutiny or possible criminal/civil charges.

Best,
Brian kc
Click to expand...

Well said. Scott should consult beforehand. He does have access to legal counsel, I'm pretty sure, and it might be good to speak to this person tonight.
 
i have a good feeling once this gets going scott will be answering more questions then people think. He will get to the point were he will want to defend himself no matter the question.
 
JAM said:
Well said. Scott should consult beforehand. He does have access to legal counsel, I'm pretty sure, and it might be good to speak to this person tonight.
Click to expand...

Harry Platis work Saturday nights for pool players ? :)
 
Man this is getting deep....why dont they just go one more round of double or nothing before we get into a Mike Vick Cock fighting no nonsense scandal.

Isnt gambling in a public arena illegal?
 
I am most curious about questions without answers

I don't think that Scott will forthrightly answer questions about what "moves" he made like putting "water" on the balls in each of the three sets. While we are told a little water doesn't last long it makes a lot of difference both in how effective it is and how long it lasts if there is a tiny amount of soap in the water or if the balls are dirty. I find the first two sets that $100,000 was paid out for as interesting as the third set when $50,000 apparently wasn't paid because I think that at the very least what happened all during play on that last day was connected, perhaps what happened every time Scott and Dave played. What did Scott do and how often? Not asking about Dave doesn't mean I think he was perfect, if Scott was the one apparently not paying I would be asking the same questions about Dave. It is reported that things didn't go as smooth as butter in the first two sets on that last day.

Some questions I have are based on a speculation on my part. However this speculation is based on the facts as they have been presented by all parties involved so I don't consider it without merit. I doubt Scott knows the answers for these questions and I don't know if anyone that knows is interested in answering. My speculation is that Dave Peat was told about Scott's shenanigans. Who told Dave Peat about the wet balls, the door, possibly some other things? When was Dave Peat told these things? I don't think Peat recognized these things when they happened or figured it out later. It's possible but the odds are probably longer than drawing a straight flush. It is almost certain he was told either late in the third set or before he refused to pay complaining about these things.

Who "smartened the chump" and when? Who, what, when, where, and how are the traditional questions but "when" is the real question. I might call things "moves" if I won a hundred thousand doing them but I'd certainly call them "cheating" if I lost a hundred thousand while the other person was doing them.

I'm left to wonder this too: If Scott had already paid off on two large bets and then found out or figured out that extracurricular activities were involved in the play that day, would he pay off the third set?

Hu
 
What does Billy I. have to say about all this? I don't see any post here from him.
If Dippy chimes into the chat room will he be allowed to ask a question or two if they are deemed appropriate?
 
mlalum said:
You're right he's not a hot head in the pool room. He's a great kid. But he is a hot head on the forums when defending his friends. And it gets him in trouble. Sorry you got the wrong impression Ken.

M
Click to expand...


No problem...thanks for clearing that up....

Obviously you are welcome to your opinion of Lenny......but it is not mine and may not be for others.

I choose to let the forum members read his posts for themselves and decide for themselves if he is or is not a hot head....They don't need me to tell them..:)
 
Ship it Mike, no live stream tomorrow, apology accepted for calling me a hot head when I am as cool as summer breeze. I spoke with Scott and told him I thought it might be a bad idea, we spoke on it for awhile and he agreed. He said to everyone as much as he would like to answer your questions and tell what happened it wont change much of anything really, it probably will only hurt him instead of help him and due to some legal stuff its just best not to.

I am going to stop wasting my time on here with this stuff, its not what pool is all about. Thanks to those who can sift through the smoke screen of BS and see what really went down and to those who can't see the forest for the trees it is either an easy or a tough life like that.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top