Chris, are the Pinoy's you are talking about, playing over here now or are they some that have not crossed the pond.
I agree they are short races, but yet there are players who have been extremely consistent in their tournament performance for longer periods. Anyone can win at that level, but you just don't see that happening. Sure, there are more than a handful of players who are capable of winning anyone, but their chances of winning top 5 player are typically more like 10-20%. Which in turn means that their chances of winning a major tournament are pretty much non-existent.
All in all, I do agree that no one player is guaranteed to win a tournament with races to say 9, but the greatest players should nevertheless be winning tournaments in consistent basis. Like several players have been doing.
The reason Shane beat Mika is not just the break, he out shot him, play much better safeties, and kicked a hell of alot better.
Mika showed how weak he is mentally in a long race when things don't go his way.
Tournaments are short races, at that level you can go years and not win a tournament. In a race to 7, 9 or even 11 anyone can win at that level.
Shane is definitely the best american 10 ball player and there a a couple pinoy's in his class , but again any of those few guys could either lose to or beat Shane on any given day.
I agree with this very much,its hard to keep on winning when the races are fairly short,and some of the competion is very close to even,like at golf or car racing not very often you see the same guys winning over and over,the competion is just to close for a run away winner.
Shane got to where he is today with that Cuetec...so give Cuetec a little bit of credit for his successes.
All of the credit goes to Shane for being able to manage to still do what he does with a Cuetech. Shane deserves a load of credit for actually still managing to be competitive with that cue. The cue gets no credit, Shane gets it all and if anything gets more credit because of the cue he has to play with to get the cash.
You can't blame Cuetec if Shane's cue is holding him back. If Shane thinks he can play better with a different cue, then it's incumbent upon him to do so.
Until then, he should be grateful for Cuetec's support which has helped his career. Given how difficult it is to make a living playing pool, I'm sure that many other aspiring players would be delighted to have Cuetec's support.
Earl would disagree![]()
I have an idea how much Shane has won in the last four years or so gambling. If you add that number to the posted tournament winnings its not even close who is the better player money wise.
*This message paid for by the Shane Is My Homeboy Committee for Truth.
To Justin's point, if one looks further back in time, I'd say that Mika has been the better player money-wise as he's been around longer.Ok- Call me a numbers geek but I added up Shane's and Mika's reported
tournament winnings on AZB spanning 4 years from 2007 to 2010.
Shane:
(http://www.azbilliards.com/thepros/2000showplayer2011.php?playernum=4315)
2010 Winnings: $76,391
2009 Winnings: $90,975
2008 Winnings: $147,420
2007 Winnings: $116,307
-------------------------------
Total. $431,093
Mika:
(http://www.azbilliards.com/thepros/2000showplayer2011.php?playernum=192)
2010 Winnings: $92,068
2009 Winnings: $238,320
2008 Winnings: $149,582
2007 Winnings: $59,636
-------------------------------
Total $539,606
So after 4 years of tourney play Mika has made $108,513 more than Shane. Safe to say Shane has made more than that gambling, including the 10K he took off MIka. I dont think Shane has anything to worry about.
To Justin's point, if one looks further back in time, I'd say that Mika has been the better player money-wise as he's been around longer.
Shane:
2006 Winnings: $16,187
2005 Winnings: $6,800
Mika:
2006 Winnings: $158,450
2005 Winnings: $83,642
2004 Winnings: $44,604
2003 Winnings: $44,418
2002 Winnings: $59,475
2001 Winnings: $99,919
2000 Winnings: $69,693
That's because Mika is 11 years older!
Sorry - I don't see your point.
Shane wasnt really on the map back then so how can you compare?