teachers learn too...Maybe there is stuff in his second DVD he had not yet learned himself?
Yes, I wrote that and stand by it. The DVD was a joke.
Get back to me when an honest review of a DVD becomes a personal attack
Lou Figueroa
3300 posts and that's the best
you can do, lol?!
No better marketing tool for an instructor than to finish high in pro events. The higher the better. Congratulations Stan Shuffett for your AMAZING and INSPIRATIONAL run at the US Open.
Yes, I wrote that and stand by it. The DVD was a joke.
Get back to me when an honest review of a DVD becomes a personal attack
Lou Figueroa
3300 posts and that's the best
you can do, lol?!
This week at our house we have been celebrating Stan's (and Phil's) success at the Open. I look at this forum maybe 3 times a year but decided to check off and on this week for obvious reasons. I can usually predict what I'm going to read here: some very nice words of praise or some pretty nasty comments (hater-talk to be specific). This leads me to the conclusion that a select few just can't stand it when someone does something well, a few of you need some serious lessons in manners, and some of you act very much like the 7 year-olds I teach.
I helped Stan with the pre-production of the DVD which took us about 2 years after Stan studied the game, fundamentals, and aiming for MANY years. I can tell you I witnessed his putting this information together in a very structured way so that anyone could learn this system. Maybe it comes from his years of teaching elementary school paired with his love of pool for the past 50 years that drives him to be the best he can be. He wants share his knowledge and enlighten those who seek information as well. Why are you so against that? Lou, I can guarantee that if you found someone who met your standards of giving an "unbiased opinion" and gave a favorable opinion of Stan's DVD, you'd throw them out and look for another someone. And it would continue until you found an opinion to agree with your idea that the DVD is a joke.
We're pushing the 1000 mark on DVD sales. I know this because I've packed and mailed about all of the darn things myself. I've also listened to Stan in phone conversations with satisfied customers and read personal emails and letters that people actually take the time to write and mail complimenting Stan on a job well done and on what a super product he has. So there are quite a few students of the game who share the opinion that he has a very useful product.
By the way, I sincerely thank all those who have posted the nice comments and kind words of congratulations.
-Connie
After a while, the word "hater" becomes so predictable in an odd way it's almost funny.
Stan is an amazing teacher and delightful human being who has devoted his life to improving the game of pool and to my knowledge has never had a bad thing to say about anyone.
And now you can add to that: he put his rep on the line, and played some strong pool in the toughest tournament in the USA. Where were you, Lou sir?
And Stan finished high in one of the World's most prestigious events, using CTE/Pro One, not some ghost ball or contact aiming system.
Originally Posted by lfigueroa View Post
Stan choose to make DVD that was incomprehensible and purposely doom the student to failure on several levels.
Lou Figueroa
There's a whole thread of these. If you think suggesting Stan made an DVD that was "incomprehensible" (when MANY thought it wasn't hard to follow) and designed to "purposely doom a student" isn't a PERSONAL ATTACK, your two degrees aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Yes, many people thought it wasn't hard to follow -- but many, even after repeated viewings, found it incomprehensible and were frustrated. It wouldn't surprise me if a new and more complete DVD came out one day, just, you know, to fill in some of the blanks that the first failed to address.
Lou Figueroa
What about all the other top players that use different systems or no system at all? Appleton uses the SEE system and he won the tournament. So...
SEE > CTE
Yes, many people thought it wasn't hard to follow -- but many, even after repeated viewings, found it incomprehensible and were frustrated. It wouldn't surprise me if a new and more complete DVD came out one day, just, you know, to fill in some of the blanks that the first failed to address.
Lou Figueroa
What about them? When they put out some DVDs then we can discuss them. I can tell you with 100% certainty that many players in the top 25 use aiming methods that are not ghost ball/contact point and not just HAMB trained feel. Maybe someday they will reveal their methods in books or videos. Until then it's their choice to be silent on the particular methods they use.
So all we have to go on are the players who DO admit publicly that they use aiming "systems". Of those the two who are most interesting at this event are elementary school teacher and pool instructor Stan Shuffett and back-to-back US Open Champion Darren Appleton. I'd also say that 20 year old Phil Burford is also a pretty good example as he made a nice splash in first US Open as well by knocking off many tough opponents after having given credit to Stan and Stan's ProOne system for helping him to improve.
The method Darren uses MIGHT be better than the method Stan teaches. However it can't hurt to know both of them. I own information on both of them and both of them are worlds better than Ghost Ball and contact points.
In any event Stan "the Man" Shuffett talked the talk and walked the walk. With that we celebrate his great run knowing that most of us wouldn't have had the balls to put up our cash and jump in the fray. Especially when a poor showing would have probably been a negative for our business.
When your business is selling instruction and that instruction happens to be a controversial aiming system then it takes major league balls of steel to enter the US Open knowing that your performance will get extra scrutiny.
It's ok if you stand by what you wrote, if that's how you really feel then fine, does not mean you are right. You wrote that Stan CHOSE to make an incomprehensible DVD and that he (Stan) PURPOSEFULLY doomed the student to failure.
You asked to be shown where you attacked Stan's character and here is the proof. Now you want more proof?
Let's forget about the product, the ProOne Aiming system, for a moment. Taking that out of the equation you are simply attacking the character of the person who made the DVD by accusing them of deliberately being confusing and misleading in order to insure that the viewer cannot succeed with the information presented.
You can't know that. You can't know that Stan DELIBERATELY did this.
And from what we know of Stan's character the last thing one would expect from him is that he would CHOOSE willfully to mislead a student and "doom" them to failure. So I don't see how you can construe your statement as anything BUT a personal attack.
So just to put this into perspective, in this thread you have said Stan is a "good guy" but that you think his product is bogus and it was pointed out to you that you have said Stan deliberately chose to deceive and doom students to failure. It does not jibe that you think he is a good guy when you accuse him of selling a bogus product intended to confuse the viewer and doom them to failure.
Sounds like pure old school doublespeak to me Lou with a big old helping of jealousy thrown in. You asked for results and Stan delivered by showing everyone that he can flat out play and I think that this bothers you immensely. That's just my observation based on your participation in this thread coupled with the general tone of your stance on what Stan teaches all these years.
You're a very good player. I am guessing you got that way the "hard way" with no help from any instructional DVDs or "systems". I would tend to think that anyone who got there with good old fashioned brute force perseverance and table time doesn't like the thought that another person could have a chance to reach the same level in less time but that's called progress.
When you knock progress and those who are progressive it's just crotchety and jealous and transparent to all who read it.
You attacked Stan personally in this thread, you have attacked him directly in the past, you have attacked him as part of a group attack on instructors who teach aiming methods associated with Hal Houle. So just own it Lou. You think that Stan Shuffet is a scammer with his ProOne and it galls you that this guy you think is a snake-oil salesman (because you claim his product is snake-oil) can actually play and posts strong finishes against tough players.
If you disagree then prove it.