A long comment on "aiming systems" ...

People were playing pool at unbelievable levels long before the current crop of aiming system gurus were even born. A Bunch of dinosaurs banging balls around and stealing money I guess.

The big innovation since that time doesn't involve the game of pool, it's the cheap DVD burner.

Indeed. It always amazes me people charge - and people will pay - $60 for an instructional DVD that costs pennies to produce. Name me one other sport where knowledge is so disproportionately expensive.
 
Indeed. It always amazes me people charge - and people will pay - $60 for an instructional DVD that costs pennies to produce. Name me one other sport where knowledge is so disproportionately expensive.

DVD costs TONS to produce and often still lose money at what they sell for.

Name one other sport? Golf. My local golf pro charges $40/30-min lesson and he's prob a hack in the GRAND scheme of things.

Pool instruction is cheap. Before someone says how expensive Stan, Ron, Randy or Scott is--- they're the best out there. Care to guess what Butch Harmon or David Leadbetter charges??? lol
 
Now for the record, i am sure there are a lots of non cte players just on this board that can beat spiderwebbcom score! It was dave aka spiderwebcomm that got that score and not cte! the aiming system he uses is a cte system. You guys are just to smart for me and remember im the dumb guy, im off to work.
 
Last edited:
I am merely curious. I have played many players that cue like you, thinking 'this is going to be easy', only for them to run rack after rack. I have no reason to think you'll be any different.

I don't have access to recording equipment, and am camera shy anyway. You do and you're not. But it would prove you can play and your aiming system works on all variety of shot, not just the ones you show to us in your vids.

What shots do you want to see? In my videos I have taken every shot challenge posted these past couple years.

Every time someone posted some shots and said that the aiming system I use can't work with the posted shots I made a video and did the shots.

So go to www.pool.bz and find the Cuetable - diagram the shots you think won't work and I will do them on video. Watching me run out doesn't mean anything.

If I miss then is it because of the system? Or because of the stroke? Or both? Can't really see that on video and this is one of the problems with this whole debate.

This whole time NO AMOUNT OF PROOF is enough. Personal testimony is discounted. Video proof is discounted. Professional players admitting they use aiming systems is discounted. Professional instructors teaching these methods is discounted.

As Lou put it, 'if Willie Mosconi himself rose from the grave and said that Aiming Systems are great, I would tell him to go back to sleep.'

So if Lou would tell the greatest straight pool player in the world he is wrong and that he should go back to being dead what in the world can you expect to learn from watching me play? What can I expect you to say?

I honestly doubt you seeing me run some racks is going to suddenly convert you to thinking aiming systems are great to use and teach.
 
Last edited:
Now for the record, i am sure there are a lots of non cte players just on this board that can beat spiderwebbcom score! It was dave aka spiderwebcomm that got that score and not cte! the aiming system he uses is a cte system. You guys are just to smart for me and im off to work.

If there are then let's see them. I have a crisp bennie for the person that does it.

It was Dave EXPRESSLY using the aiming system he advocates that got the score. It was Dave crediting the aiming system he advocates with giving him the ability to get the score.

I am giving everyone here 24 days to beat it and post a video. Let's see how long it takes for that to happen IF it happens.

For the record Dave did it in ONE TAKE as far as I know. Iwill leave it up to the honor system for people to tell us how many times they tried it. I don't care if they do it 100 times I just want to see it.
 
If I beat my score and post a video, will you send me a case? I think 16/17 was the score, on a 9'er with 4.5 pockets.

I think people can beat that score, fyi. If you review Colin's original thread, you'll see I made my video very shortly after he posted the challenge. If you gave me (or anyone else) a 30 day window to beat the score I posted within a day, you can't win that proposition.

Thanks for the vote of confidence though :)

That is some good shooting.

Here's the thread I found regarding this:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=184453

I think I'm going to do some work on that drill. I'm sure I could use the work. I don't see the point in trying to beat Dave's score (if possible) since he just about made all of them!!!
 
To this day NO ONE on the forum has beaten Dave Segal's score on Colin Colenso's pocketing test.

I will bet $100 that from now to the end of February no person who is NOT a confirmed system proponent on this forum will post a video of themselves beating Dave's score.

Simple proposition. Open to all non-professionals on the forum. Put the money where the mouth is. You have snooker fundamentals? Ok should be easy to beat Dave's score. You have 40 years of time in? Should be easy to beat Dave's score.

I will send you $100 free and clear via PayPal if you post a video beating Dave's score.

No need to talk about it. Show it.

John can i post my old video..lol..i think i scored perfect on my 8 footer.
Im also sure i can do it on my 9 footer. One thing though im not a naysayer.Does this bet still go fotr me.:D
 
That is some good shooting.

Here's the thread I found regarding this:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=184453

I think I'm going to do some work on that drill. I'm sure I could use the work. I don't see the point in trying to beat Dave's score (if possible) since he just about made all of them!!!

In full disclosure, I just finished a great 14.1 session and came off a big run. I was in-mode. If I tried cold, ermm... prob wouldn't have happened.
 
As Lou put it, "if Willie Mosconi himself rose from the grave and said that Aiming Systems are great, I would tell him to go back to sleep."

So if Lou would tell the greatest straight pool player in the world he is wrong and that he should go back to being dead what in the world can you expect to learn from watching me play? What can I expect you to say?


John, please do not play fast and loose (again) with what I have said.

The use of quotation marks means you are citing *word for word* something I've said. IOW, it should represent my *exact* words.

Don't bother asking me what I did say. Do your own homework.

Lou Figueroa
love it when
people quote me
to me
 
What shots do you want to see? In my videos I have taken every shot challenge posted these past couple years.

Every time someone posted some shots and said that the aiming system I use can't work with the posted shots I made a video and did the shots.

So go to www.pool.bz and find the Cuetable - diagram the shots you think won't work and I will do them on video. Watching me run out doesn't mean anything.

If I miss then is it because of the system? Or because of the stroke? Or both? Can't really see that on video and this is one of the problems with this whole debate.

This whole time NO AMOUNT OF PROOF is enough. Personal testimony is discounted. Video proof is discounted. Professional players admitting they use aiming systems is discounted. Professional instructors teaching these methods is discounted.

As Lou put it, "if Willie Mosconi himself rose from the grave and said that Aiming Systems are great, I would tell him to go back to sleep."

So if Lou would tell the greatest straight pool player in the world he is wrong and that he should go back to being dead what in the world can you expect to learn from watching me play? What can I expect you to say?

I honestly doubt you seeing me run some racks is going to suddenly convert you to thinking aiming systems are great to use and teach.

The burden of proof is on you guys to demonstrate it works, not on us. Beat the ghost easily with THAT cue action and I'll believe your system improves your play.

You make videos of pretty much everything else - why not a game against the ghost? What are you afraid of?
 
Indeed. It always amazes me people charge - and people will pay - $60 for an instructional DVD that costs pennies to produce. Name me one other sport where knowledge is so disproportionately expensive.

Yeah burning a DVD is cheap. This 30 seconds cost us more than $20,000 to make - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJuv5SBaqMo

Now try to price out the cost of hiring a professional videographer and editor to make a halfway professional hour long video anything.

Disproportionally expensive? Um I am afraid you are not quite up with the prices of videos in other sports

http://sportvideos.com/home.php?cat=37 Golf - from $20 to $50

Biliards DVDs are no more expensive on average than any other sports DVDs.
 
John can i post my old video..lol..i think i scored perfect on my 8 footer.
Im also sure i can do it on my 9 footer. One thing though im not a naysayer.Does this bet still go fotr me.:D

You don't count LOL. In all seriousness, it should only qualify on 9'er with 4.5" pockets. Reason being, on a smaller table (maybe even with bigger pockets), scores would soar. I know on a 7er, regardless of pocket size, it's not much of a test. An 8er is harder-- but a 9'er with smaller pockets should be standard.

I only say this because there should be a baseline on equipment. That said, I think you can beat my score on a 9'er--- I'm a fan of your game.
 
People were playing pool at unbelievable levels long before the current crop of aiming system gurus were even born. A Bunch of dinosaurs banging balls around and stealing money I guess.

The big innovation since that time doesn't involve the game of pool, it's the cheap DVD burner.


No kidding. Someone posted not too long ago that they had sold 1,000 copies of an instructional DVD at $39 a pop. Even minus production costs it doesn't take a beautiful mind to figure out DVDs are a big money maker.

Lou Figueroa
 
John, please do not play fast and loose (again) with what I have said.

The use of quotation marks means you are citing *word for word* something I've said. IOW, it should represent my *exact* words.

Don't bother asking me what I did say. Do your own homework.

Lou Figueroa
love it when
people quote me
to me

I liked it how John said it!

Did Mosconi use an aiming system BTW?
 
Back
Top