Wrapped backwards like a Szam?

PDX

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Are there any cuemakers, from the old days, that where known for wrapping their cues like Gus did?

Thanks
 
Are there any cuemakers, from the old days, that where known for wrapping their cues like Gus did?

Thanks

sorry for my ignorance:embarrassed2:......:embarrassed2:
what is a backwards wrap??
 
O crap! I ordered a cue and neglected to specify righty or lefty. I hope he builds it with the tip at the top and the bumper at the bottom, and not the other way around.
 
Being a righty, I miss with left handed cues a lot.

Maybe I should have changed the title to "who, back in the day(60's/70's), wrapped their cues like Szamboti did?"
 
Being a righty, I miss with left handed cues a lot.

Maybe I should have changed the title to "who, back in the day(60's/70's), wrapped their cues like Szamboti did?"


!sesnopser doog ynam os nettog evah t'ndluow uoy nehT !haN
 
¡sʎnƃ spɹɐʍʞɔɐq sƃuıɥʇ əsəɥʇ ʇəƃ oʇ ʇou lnɟəɹɐɔ əq oʇ əʌɐɥ ʎllɐəɹ noʎ


:smile:


.
 
I once skinned 381 chameleon's, dried them out for months, hand sewn them togeather and made a wrap out of them. I chalked it with blue chalk and to my delight the wrap turned blue. A friend wanted to try it and put it on the rail of a red clothed table. It exploded.
 
Being a righty, I miss with left handed cues a lot.

Maybe I should have changed the title to "who, back in the day(60's/70's), wrapped their cues like Szamboti did?"

Hmmm, don't know why this question is so amusing. It is my understanding
that Balabushka wrapped his cues "backwards".
Since Gus' cues were more or less a minor heresey of George's, wrapping
them the same way would seem likely.

Perhaps you should explain exactly what you mean by 'backwards'.
My understanding was he fed the thread under the cue(?).

Dale(enquiring mind, you know...)
 
Last edited:
I've honestly never looked at the wrap on a Szam close enough to tell if it was wrapped backwards,just enough to tell that I've never seen one that has anything close to a gap in it.

If he did them backwards,it HAD to have been done by feeding it on from underneath the cue,which means he did it on a lathe that didn't have reverse spindle rotation,or it had reverse and he just didn't like doing it that way.

With all the people here with more knowledge and experience than me,and no one mentioned this :p? Tommy D.
 
You cannot look at a wrap and know if it was run under or over the top unless you know whether they run it left to right or right to left and which way the cue was held in the lathe.

I knew someone who worked at the Meucci plant for a short time and he said they put him on wrapping cues. The linen came down from overhead. He said he asked to be moved to something else as he was just making a mess things.

If someone did not have reverse on their lathe I could see them running it underneath.
 
You cannot look at a wrap and know if it was run under or over the top unless you know whether they run it left to right or right to left and which way the cue was held in the lathe.

I knew someone who worked at the Meucci plant for a short time and he said they put him on wrapping cues. The linen came down from overhead. He said he asked to be moved to something else as he was just making a mess things.

If someone did not have reverse on their lathe I could see them running it underneath.

Correctamundo - which is why I always assumed whoever was the
source for the 'wrapped backwards' story had, in fact, seen George
wrap a cue or two. In which case it would not have been difficult
to determine.

Dale
 
Back
Top